Cited by 606Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesMachine Learning and Algorithms

A survey on active learning and human-in-the-loop deep learning for medical image analysis

Open access
Budd, Samuel, Robinson, Emma C., Kainz, Bernhard·2021·Medical Image Analysis

Abstract

Fully automatic deep learning has become the state-of-the-art technique for many tasks including image acquisition, analysis and interpretation, and for the extraction of clinically useful information for computer-aided detection, diagnosis, treatment planning, intervention and therapy. However, the unique challenges posed by medical image analysis suggest that retaining a human end-user in any deep learning enabled system will be beneficial. In this review we investigate the role that humans might play in the development and deployment of deep learning enabled diagnostic applications and focus on techniques that will retain a significant input from a human end user. Human-in-the-Loop computing is an area that we see as increasingly important in future research due to the safety-critical nature of working in the medical domain. We evaluate four key areas that we consider vital for deep learning in the clinical practice: (1) Active Learning to choose the best data to annotate for optimal model performance; (2) Interaction with model outputs - using iterative feedback to steer models to optima for a given prediction and offering meaningful ways to interpret and respond to predictions; (3) Practical considerations - developing full scale applications and the key considerations that need to be made before deployment; (4) Future Prospective and Unanswered Questions - knowledge gaps and related research fields that will benefit human-in-the-loop computing as they evolve. We offer our opinions on the most promising directions of research and how various aspects of each area might be unified towards common goals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.media.2021.102062

Cites

121 of 121 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous reviews are more oriented to other AI areas such as natural language processing, speech processing, and computer vision, without going deeper into OD, showing only a few related papers.

    “Furthermore, previous reviews [8,10-13] are more oriented to other AI areas such as natural language processing, speech processing, and computer vision, but without going deeper into OD, showing only a few related papers.”

    From Ten Years of Active Learning Techniques and Object Detection: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [11]

    The introduction (p. 2) identifies this as a review of human-in-the-loop deep learning for medical image analysis and says it focuses on medical image segmentation, supporting the point that it is not an in-depth review of object detection (OD). Our copy does not establish that it shows only a few OD-related papers. The references to natural language and speech processing appear to describe the cited reviews collectively, not necessarily this source. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There are three main active learning scenarios: membership query synthesis, stream-based selective sampling, and pool-based sampling.

    “Generally, there are three main scenarios in AL, as discussed in [11,35]:”
  • Five recent active learning reviews were identified in the preliminary search.

    “Five recent AL reviews [8,10-13] were identified in that process”
  • New standards are currently being developed in industry to guide businesses on how to define, implement and measure data quality throughout the ML development lifecycle.

    “Similar trends are happening in industry, where new standards are currently being developed to guide businesses on how to define, implement and measure data quality throughout the ML development lifecycle [18].”

    From A Survey of Data Quality Requirements That Matter in ML Development Pipelines (2023) · cites this paper as [18]

    Section 4, “Practical Considerations” (p. 11), discusses developing and deploying deep-learning applications, while Section 5 (p. 15) calls for baseline methods to assess their performance. Neither passage addresses industry standards for defining, implementing, or measuring data quality across the ML development lifecycle; searches for “industry standards” and “data quality” found no passage that does. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Active learning methods could enable selection of uncertain samples or users for further analysis such as additional review by domain experts (physicians).

    “Furthermore, active learning methods could enable the selection of uncertain samples or users for further analysis such as an additional review by domain experts (physicians) [186].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Amrehn, M., Gaube, S., Unberath, M., Schebesch, F., Horz, T., Strumia, M., Steidl, S., Kowarschik, M., Maier, A., 2017. UI-Net: Interactive Artificial Neural Networks for Iterative Image Segmentation Based on a User Model, in: Bruckner, S., Hennemuth, A., Kainz, B., Hotz, I., Merhof, D., Rieder, C. (Eds.), Eurographics Workshop on Visual Computing for Biology and Medicine, The Eurographics Association. doi: 10 : 2312/vcbm : 20171248 .
  2. Cheplygina, V., Perez-Rovira, A., Kuo, W., Tiddens, H.A., de Bruijne, M., 2016. Early experiences with crowdsourcing airway annotations in chest CT, in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Springer Verlag. pp. 209-218. URL: https://link : springer : com/chapter/ 10 : 1007/978-3-319-46976-8 22 , doi: 10 : 1007/978-3-319-469768{ n }22 .
  3. Guan, H., Liu, M., 2021. Domain Adaptation for Medical Image Analysis: A Survey URL: http://arxiv : org/abs/2102 : 09508 .
  4. Rodrigues, F., Pereira, F.C., 2018. Deep learning from crowds, in: The ThirtySecond AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 2018, AAAI Press. pp. 1611-1618.
  5. Zhou, Z., Shin, J., Feng, R., Hurst, R.T., Kendall, C.B., Liang, J., 2018b. Integrating Active Learning and Transfer Learning for Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Video Interpretation. Journal of Digital Imaging URL: http://www : ncbi : nlm : nih : gov/pubmed/30402668http: //link : springer : com/10 : 1007/s10278-018-0143-2 , doi: 10 : 1007/ s10278-018-0143-2 .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Budd, S., Robinson, E. C., & Kainz, B.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Budd, Samuel
Venue
Medical Image Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
71
Pages
102062
ISSN
1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2977942577
Cited by
606
References
121
Citations by year
2026: 84 · 2025: 110 · 2024: 138 · 2023: 127 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 6
FWCI
8.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Image Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Imperial College London
  • King's College London EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Medical Imaging
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
Keywords
active learning (machine learning), clinical annotation, model interpretability, iterative feedback, model deployment, safety-critical systems, computer-aided diagnosis, human-machine interaction
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review