Cited by 14Image Enhancement TechniquesAdvanced Image Processing TechniquesMedical Image Segmentation Techniques

Tunable image quality control of 3-D ultrasound using switchable CycleGAN

Open access
Huh, Jaeyoung, Khan, Shujaat, Choi, Sungjin, Shin, Dongkuk, Lee, Jeong Eun, Lee, Eun Sun, Ye, Jong Chul·2023·Medical Image Analysis

Abstract

In contrast to 2-D ultrasound (US) for uniaxial plane imaging, a 3-D US imaging system can visualize a volume along three axial planes. This allows for a full view of the anatomy, which is useful for gynecological (GYN) and obstetrical (OB) applications. Unfortunately, the 3-D US has an inherent limitation in resolution compared to the 2-D US. In the case of 3-D US with a 3-D mechanical probe, for example, the image quality is comparable along the beam direction, but significant deterioration in image quality is often observed in the other two axial image planes. To address this, here we propose a novel unsupervised deep learning approach to improve 3-D US image quality. In particular, using unmatched high-quality 2-D US images as a reference, we trained a recently proposed switchable CycleGAN architecture so that every mapping plane in 3-D US can learn the image quality of 2-D US images. Thanks to the switchable architecture, our network can also provide real-time control of image enhancement level based on user preference, which is ideal for a user-centric scanner setup. Extensive experiments with clinical evaluation confirm that our method offers significantly improved image quality as well user-friendly flexibility.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.media.2022.102651

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huh, J., Khan, S., Choi, S., Shin, D., Lee, J. E., Lee, E. S., & Ye, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
  • Samsung Medison (South Korea) (KR)
  • Chungnam National University Hospital (KR)
  • Chung-Ang University Hospital (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Lee, Eun Sun
  • Ye, Jong Chul
Venue
Medical Image Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-01
Volume
83
Pages
102651
ISSN
1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4226218693
Cited by
14
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Image Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation (NRF-2020R1A2B5B03001980)
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF‐2020R1A2B5B03001980)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Enhancement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Keywords
3D ultrasound, image quality control, unsupervised image enhancement, gynecologic ultrasound, real-time image enhancement, user preferences
MeSH terms
Humans, Quality Control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review