Tunable image quality control of 3-D ultrasound using switchable CycleGAN
Open accessAbstract
In contrast to 2-D ultrasound (US) for uniaxial plane imaging, a 3-D US imaging system can visualize a volume along three axial planes. This allows for a full view of the anatomy, which is useful for gynecological (GYN) and obstetrical (OB) applications. Unfortunately, the 3-D US has an inherent limitation in resolution compared to the 2-D US. In the case of 3-D US with a 3-D mechanical probe, for example, the image quality is comparable along the beam direction, but significant deterioration in image quality is often observed in the other two axial image planes. To address this, here we propose a novel unsupervised deep learning approach to improve 3-D US image quality. In particular, using unmatched high-quality 2-D US images as a reference, we trained a recently proposed switchable CycleGAN architecture so that every mapping plane in 3-D US can learn the image quality of 2-D US images. Thanks to the switchable architecture, our network can also provide real-time control of image enhancement level based on user preference, which is ideal for a user-centric scanner setup. Extensive experiments with clinical evaluation confirm that our method offers significantly improved image quality as well user-friendly flexibility.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI image enhancement methods could produce increased 3D image quality with user-preferential flexibility in both gynecological and obstetric US images.
“AI image enhancement methods could produce increased 3D image quality with user-preferential flexibility in both gynecological and obstetric US images [226].”
Cites
A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales
Cohen, J. (1960) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316446002000104 · Cited by 42,398 · see citing works
Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks
Zhu, J.-Y., Park, T., Isola, P., & Efros, A. A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.244 · Cited by 23,602 · see citing works
Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic
McHugh, M. L. (2012) · Biochemia Medica · doi:10.11613/bm.2012.031 · Cited by 19,877 · see citing works
The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance
Friedman, M. (1937) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1937.10503522 · Cited by 7,005 · see citing works
Image Style Transfer Using Convolutional Neural Networks
Gatys, L. A., Ecker, A. S., & Bethge, M. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.265 · Cited by 6,025 · see citing works
“Least squares generative adversarial networks,”
Mao, X., Li, Q., Xie, H., Lau, R. Y. K., Wang, Z., & Smolley, S. P. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.304 · Cited by 5,437 · see citing works
Arbitrary Style Transfer in Real-Time with Adaptive Instance Normalization
Huang, X., & Belongie, S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.167 · Cited by 5,076 · see citing works
Computational Optimal Transport with Applications to Data Sciences
Gabriel Peyré, A., & Cuturi, M. (2019) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000073 · Cited by 2,354 · see citing works
Teoria Statistica Delle Classi e Calcolo Delle Probabilità
(2010) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412961288.n455 · Cited by 1,702 · see citing works
Buades, A., Coll, B., & Morel, J. (2011) · Image Processing On Line · doi:10.5201/ipol.2011.bcm_nlm · Cited by 1,116 · see citing works
Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging
Fenster, A., Downey, D. B., & Cardinal, H. N. (2001) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/46/5/201 · Cited by 812 · see citing works
Combining Markov Random Fields and Convolutional Neural Networks for Image Synthesis
Li, C., & Wand, M. (2016) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.272 · Cited by 758 · see citing works
3-D ultrasound imaging: a review
Fenster, A., & Downey, D. B. (1996) · IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine · doi:10.1109/51.544511 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
A Review on Real-Time 3D Ultrasound Imaging Technology
Huang, Q., & Zeng, Z. (2017) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2017/6027029 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Cycle‐consistent adversarial denoising network for multiphase coronary CT angiography
Kang, E., Koo, H. J., Yang, D. H., Seo, J. B., & Ye, J. C. (2018) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.13284 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Self-citationDeep Unfolded Robust PCA With Application to Clutter Suppression in Ultrasound
Solomon, O., Cohen, R., Zhang, Y., Yang, Y., He, Q., Luo, J., van Sloun, R. J. G., & Eldar, Y. C. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2019.2941271 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Adaptive Ultrasound Beamforming Using Deep Learning
Luijten, B., Cohen, R., de Bruijn, F. J., Schmeitz, H. A. W., Mischi, M., Eldar, Y. C., & van Sloun, R. J. G. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2020.3008537 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Deep Neural Networks for Ultrasound Beamforming
Luchies, A. C., & Byram, B. C. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2018.2809641 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Beamforming and Speckle Reduction Using Neural Networks
Hyun, D., Brickson, L. L., Looby, K., & Dahl, J. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control · doi:10.1109/tuffc.2019.2903795 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Efficient B-Mode Ultrasound Image Reconstruction From Sub-Sampled RF Data Using Deep Learning
Yoon, Y. H., Khan, S., Huh, J., & Ye, J. C. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2018.2864821 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Self-citationThree-dimensional ultrasound scanning
Fenster, A., Párraga, G., & Bax, J. S. (2011) · Interface Focus · doi:10.1098/rsfs.2011.0019 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Local statistics and non-local mean filter for speckle noise reduction in medical ultrasound image
Yang, J., Fan, J., Ai, D., Wang, X., Zheng, Y., Songyuan, T., & Wang, Y. (2016) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2015.05.140 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Adaptive and Compressive Beamforming Using Deep Learning for Medical Ultrasound
Khan, S., Huh, J., & Ye, J. C. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control · doi:10.1109/tuffc.2020.2977202 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Self-citationSparse 2-D array design for real time rectilinear volumetric imaging
Yen, J. T., Steinberg, J. P., & Smith, S. W. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control · doi:10.1109/58.818752 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
AdaIN-Based Tunable CycleGAN for Efficient Unsupervised Low-Dose CT Denoising
Gu, J., & Ye, J. C. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging · doi:10.1109/tci.2021.3050266 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Self-citationDeep Learning for Super-resolution Vascular Ultrasound Imaging
van Sloun, R. J. G., Solomon, O., Bruce, M. F., Khaing, Z. Z., Eldar, Y. C., & Mischi, M. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2019.8683813 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Unpaired Deep Learning for Accelerated MRI Using Optimal Transport Driven CycleGAN
Oh, G., Sim, B., Chung, H., Sunwoo, L., & Ye, J. C. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging · doi:10.1109/tci.2020.3018562 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Self-citationA Deep Learning Based Alternative to Beamforming Ultrasound Images
Nair, A. A., Tran, T. D., Reiter, A., & Bell, M. A. L. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2018.8461575 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
A Non-local Low-Rank Framework for Ultrasound Speckle Reduction
Zhu, L., Fu, C., Brown, M. S., & Heng, P. (2017) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.60 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Optimal Transport Driven CycleGAN for Unsupervised Learning in Inverse Problems
Sim, B., Oh, G., Kim, J., Jung, C., & Ye, J. C. (2020) · SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences · doi:10.1137/20m1317992 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Self-citationDespeckling of clinical ultrasound images using deep residual learning
Kokil, P., & Sudharson, S. (2020) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105477 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
A deep learning approach to ultrasound image recovery
Perdios, D., Besson, A., Arditi, M., & Thiran, J. (2017) · IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium · doi:10.1109/ultsym.2017.8092746 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Ultrasound Image Enhancement
Perdios, D., Vonlanthen, M., Besson, A., Martinez, F., Arditi, M., & Thiran, J. (2018) · IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium · doi:10.1109/ultsym.2018.8580183 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Continuous Conversion of CT Kernel Using Switchable CycleGAN With AdaIN
Yang, S., Kim, E. Y., & Ye, J. C. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2021.3077615 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationBrickson, L. L., Hyun, D., Jakovljevic, M., & Dahl, J. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2021.3049307 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Variational Formulation of Unsupervised Deep Learning for Ultrasound Image Artifact Removal
Khan, S., Huh, J., & Ye, J. C. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control · doi:10.1109/tuffc.2021.3056197 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citationMissing Cone Artifact Removal in ODT Using Unsupervised Deep Learning in the Projection Domain
Chung, H., Huh, J., Kim, G., Park, Y., & Ye, J. C. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging · doi:10.1109/tci.2021.3098937 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationPhase Aberration Correction: A Convolutional Neural Network Approach
Sharifzadeh, M., Benali, H., & Rivaz, H. J. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3021685 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Deep Learning-Based Universal Beamformer for Ultrasound Imaging
Khan, S., Huh, J., & Ye, J. C. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32254-0_69 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citationUltrasound Speckle Reduction Using Generative Adversial Networks
Dietrichson, F., Smistad, E., Østvik, A., & Løvstakken, L. (2018) · IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium · doi:10.1109/ultsym.2018.8579764 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Two-stage deep learning for accelerated 3D time-of-flight MRA without matched training data
Chung, H., Cha, E., Sunwoo, L., & Ye, J. C. (2021) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2021.102047 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationWasserstein Style TransferPreprint
Mroueh, Y. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.12828 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Unsupervised Deconvolution Neural Network for High Quality Ultrasound Imaging
Khan, S., Huh, J., & Ye, J. C. (2020) · IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium · doi:10.1109/ius46767.2020.9251418 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationSwitchable Deep Beamformer For Ultrasound Imaging Using Adain
Khan, S., Huh, J., & Ye, J. C. (2021) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi48211.2021.9433757 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationImproving Contrast of Fundamental Ultrasound Imaging Using a Deep Neural Network
Sadeghi, A., Apostolakis, I., Meral, F. C., Vignon, F., Shin, J. S., & Robert, J.-L. (2021) · IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium · doi:10.1109/ius52206.2021.9593665 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Phase Constraint Improves Ultrasound Image Quality Reconstructed using Deep Neural Network
Zuo, H., Zhang, J., Luo, J., & Peng, B. (2021) · IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium · doi:10.1109/ius52206.2021.9593647 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Unsupervised Learning for Acoustic Shadowing Artifact Removal in Ultrasound Imaging
Huh, J., Khan, S., & Ye, J. C. (2021) · IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium · doi:10.1109/ius52206.2021.9593451 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ultrasound Signal Processing: From Models to Deep Learning
Luijten, B., Chennakeshava, N., Eldar, Y. C., Mischi, M., & van Sloun, R. J. G. (2023) · Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.11.003 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Jost, E., Kosian, P., Jimenez Cruz, J., Albarqouni, S., Gembruch, U., Strizek, B., & Recker, F. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm12216833 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“Another study addressed the issue of poor image quality in 3D US images due to data processing and showed that AI image enhancement methods could produce increased 3D image quality with user-preferential flexibility in both gynecological and obstetric US images [226].”
BackgroundMoinuddin, M., Khan, S., Alsaggaf, A. U., Abdulaal, M. J., Al-Saggaf, U. M., & Ye, J. C. (2022) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2022.961571 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citationLow-dose computed tomography perceptual image quality assessment
Lee, W., Wagner, F., Galdrán, A., Shi, Y., Xia, W., Wang, G., Mou, X., Ahamed, M. A., Imran, A.-A.-Z., Oh, J. E., et al. (2024) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2024.103343 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Khojaste-Sarakhsi, M., Haghighi, S. S., Ghomi, S. M. T. F., & Marchiori, E. (2024) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2024.105017 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
A survey on unsupervised domain adaptation in medical imaging: Methods, datasets, and future outlook
Yang, H., Guo, H., Liu, G., Zhou, L., Xu, J. H., Wei, L., Su, R., & Jin, Q. (2026) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2026.115314 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Ossenkoppele, B. W., Luijten, B., Bera, D., de Jong, N., Verweij, M. D., & van Sloun, R. J. G. (2022) · Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.08.017 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Luosang, G., Wang, Z., Liu, J., Zeng, F., Zhang, Y., & Wang, J. (2024) · International Journal of Neural Systems · doi:10.1142/s0129065724500540 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Emerging applications of artificial intelligence for obstetric ultrasound: A scoping review
Gupta, V., Santos, N., Ripa, S. D., & Walker, D. A. (2026) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.70789 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Unsupervised Ultrafast Ultrasound Imaging Based on Decoupled Contrastive Learning
Lu, J., Wang, A., Liang, W., Zhuang, H., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · IEEE Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control Joint Symposium (UFFC-JS) · doi:10.1109/uffc-js60046.2024.10794099 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Unsupervised Semantic Constrained Denoising Framework for Ultrasound Plane-Wave Imaging
Liang, W., Lu, J., Jing, J., Wang, H., Wang, A., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2025.3593585 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Ultrasound Image Quality Control Using Speech-Assisted Switchable CycleGAN
Huh, J., Khan, S., Lee, E. S., & Ye, J. C. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49357.2023.10096342
Self-citationClutter Suppression in 3D in-vivo Medical Ultrasound Using In-Face Extended Frank-Wolfe Method
Khan, S., Huh, J., Saikhan, L. A., & Ye, J. C. (2025) · IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium · doi:10.1109/ius62464.2025.11201661
Self-citationDeployable Ultrasound Segmentation Via Deformable Attention-Enhanced UNet
Munir, A., & Khan, S. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE) · doi:10.1109/bibe66822.2025.00044
Self-citation
- Authors
- Huh, J., Khan, S., Choi, S., Shin, D., Lee, J. E., Lee, E. S., & Ye, J. C.
- Affiliations
- Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
- Samsung Medison (South Korea) (KR)
- Chungnam National University Hospital (KR)
- Chung-Ang University Hospital (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Lee, Eun Sun
- Ye, Jong Chul
- Venue
- Medical Image Analysis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-01
- Volume
- 83
- Pages
- 102651
- ISSN
- 1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4226218693
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 0.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Medical Image Analysis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Research Foundation (NRF-2020R1A2B5B03001980)
- National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF‐2020R1A2B5B03001980)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Enhancement Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Keywords
- 3D ultrasound, image quality control, unsupervised image enhancement, gynecologic ultrasound, real-time image enhancement, user preferences
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Quality Control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review