Cited by 812Ultrasound in Clinical ApplicationsUltrasound Imaging and ElastographyMedical Image Segmentation Techniques

Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging

Fenster, Aaron, Downey, Dónal B, Cardinal, H Neale·2001·Physics in Medicine and Biology

Abstract

Ultrasound is an inexpensive and widely used imaging modality for the diagnosis and staging of a number of diseases. In the past two decades, it has benefited from major advances in technology and has become an indispensable imaging modality, due to its flexibility and non-invasive character. In the last decade, research investigators and commercial companies have further advanced ultrasound imaging with the development of 3D ultrasound. This new imaging approach is rapidly achieving widespread use with numerous applications. The major reason for the increase in the use of 3D ultrasound is related to the limitations of 2D viewing of 3D anatomy, using conventional ultrasound. This occurs because: (a) Conventional ultrasound images are 2D, yet the anatomy is 3D, hence the diagnostician must integrate multiple images in his mind. This practice is inefficient, and may lead to variability and incorrect diagnoses. (b) The 2D ultrasound image represents a thin plane at some arbitrary angle in the body. It is difficult to localize the image plane and reproduce it at a later time for follow-up studies. In this review article we describe how 3D ultrasound imaging overcomes these limitations. Specifically, we describe the developments of a number of 3D ultrasound imaging systems using mechanical, free-hand and 2D array scanning techniques. Reconstruction and viewing methods of the 3D images are described with specific examples. Since 3D ultrasound is used to quantify the volume of organs and pathology, the sources of errors in the reconstruction techniques as well as formulae relating design specification to geometric errors are provided. Finally, methods to measure organ volume from the 3D ultrasound images and sources of errors are described.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0031-9155/46/5/201

Cites

141 of 141 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A 2D US image presents a thin plane at arbitrary angles in the body, and these planes are difficult to localize and reproduce later for follow-up studies.

    “A 2D US image presents a thin plane at various arbitrary angles in the body.These planes are difficult to localize and reproduce later for follow-up studies [51].”

    From Deep Learning in Medical Ultrasound Analysis: A Review (2019) · cites this paper as [51]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fenster, A., Downey, D. B., & Cardinal, H. N.
Affiliations
  • Robarts Research Institute (CA)
  • Western University (CA)
Venue
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2001-04-04
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
R67-R99
ISSN
  • 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6560
OpenAlex
W2148234126
Cited by
812
References
141
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 33
FWCI
5.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physics in Medicine and Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Keywords
three-dimensional ultrasound imaging, 3D ultrasound reconstruction, mechanical scanning, organ volume measurement, reconstruction error, geometric error, volumetric quantification
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Neoplasms, Ultrasonography, Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review