Cited by 27Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusLong-Term Effects of COVID-19

The putative glymphatic signature of chronic fatigue syndrome: a new view on the disease pathogenesis and therapy

Wostyn, Peter, De Deyn, Peter Paul·2018·Medical Hypotheses

Abstract

The underlying pathophysiology of chronic fatigue syndrome remains incompletely understood and there are no curative treatments for this disorder at present. However, increasing neuroimaging evidence indicates that functional and structural abnormalities exist in the brains of chronic fatigue syndrome patients, suggesting that the central nervous system is involved in this disorder and that at least some chronic fatigue syndrome patients may have an underlying neurological basis for their illness. In the present paper, we speculate that glymphatic dysfunction, causing toxic build up within the central nervous system, may be responsible for at least some cases of chronic fatigue syndrome. We further postulate that cerebrospinal fluid diversion such as lumboperitoneal shunting may be beneficial to this subgroup of patients by restoring glymphatic transport and waste removal from the brain. Although recent evidence indicates that at least some chronic fatigue syndrome patients may benefit from cerebrospinal fluid drainage, further studies are needed to confirm this finding and to determine whether this can be attributed to enhancement of glymphatic fluid flow and interstitial fluid clearance. If confirmed, this could offer promising avenues for the future treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome. Clearly, given the relative invasive nature of cerebrospinal fluid diversion, such procedures should be reserved for chronic fatigue syndrome patients who are severely debilitated, or for those with severe headaches. Anyhow, it seems worthwhile to make every effort to identify new therapies for patients who suffer from this devastating disease, especially given that there are currently no effective treatments for this condition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mehy.2018.07.007

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wostyn, P., & De Deyn, P. P.
Corresponding author
Wostyn, Peter
Venue
Medical Hypotheses
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
118
Pages
142-145
ISSN
0306-9877 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2848834207
Cited by
27
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Hypotheses (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Keywords
chronic fatigue syndrome, glymphatic system, cerebrospinal fluid shunting, lumboperitoneal shunt, brain waste clearance, interstitial fluid clearance, neuroimaging abnormalities, central nervous system involvement, pathogenesis, treatment
MeSH terms
Biological Transport, Brain, Cerebrospinal Fluid, Drainage, Headache, Humans, Hydrocephalus, Lymph Nodes, Models, Theoretical, Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic, Extracellular Fluid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review