Cited by 93Force Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 113 of the 114 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preparation of DNA and nucleoprotein samples for AFM imaging

Open access
Lyubchenko, Yuri L.·2011·Micron

Abstract

Sample preparation techniques allowing reliable and reproducible imaging of DNA with various structures, topologies and complexes with proteins are reviewed. The major emphasis is given to methods utilizing chemical functionalization of mica, enabling preparation of the surfaces with required characteristics. The methods are illustrated by examples of imaging of different DNA structures. Special attention is given to the possibility of AFM to image the dynamics of DNA at the nanoscale. The capabilities of time-lapse AFM in aqueous solutions are illustrated by imaging of dynamic processes as transitions of local alternative structures (transition of DNA between H and B forms). The application of AFM to studies of protein-DNA complexes is illustrated by a few examples of imaging site-specific complexes, as well as such systems as chromatin. The time-lapse AFM studies of protein-DNA complexes including very recent advances with the use of high-speed AFM are reviewed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.micron.2010.08.011

Cites

113 of 113 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 93

Metadata

Authors
Lyubchenko, Y. L.
Affiliations
Nebraska Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Lyubchenko, Yuri L.
Venue
Micron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-02
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
196-206
ISSN
0968-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072317160
Cited by
93
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Micron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM62235, R01GM062235)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Keywords
DNA imaging, nucleoprotein complexes, protein-DNA complex, chromatin, DNA dynamics, high-speed AFM
MeSH terms
DNA, DNA, Superhelical, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Nucleoproteins, Microscopy, Atomic Force

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review