Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Women's behaviour, beliefs and information sources about physical exercise in pregnancy

Open access
Clarke, Penny E, Gross, Harriet·2004·Midwifery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To examine the potential effect of low-risk pregnancy on women's recreational activity patterns and to explore pregnant women's beliefs and information sources regarding physical exercise participation. DESIGN Preliminary, prospective survey SETTING Participants' homes in the East Midlands, UK. PARTICIPANTS Fifty-seven nulliparous, pregnant women. MEASUREMENTS Levels of maternal physical activity participation were assessed by semi-structured interview at 16, 25, 34 and 38 weeks gestation. The modified Baecke questionnaire provided a measure of women's habitual sport and leisure activities in the 12 months prior to pregnancy. A 10-item scale assessed maternal beliefs regarding the importance of physical activity in pregnancy. The fetal health locus of control scale measured the extent to which women believed their own behaviour, the behaviour of others and/or chance would influence fetal health. Open-ended questions assessed women's information sources. FINDINGS Fourteen of the 36 (39%) women who reported participating in some form of weekly exercise before pregnancy did not report pursuing any similar activities during pregnancy. Rest and relaxation were perceived as being significantly more important during pregnancy than was regular exercise or the maintenance of an active lifestyle. Fifty-five respondents (96%) indicated that they had received advice about physical activity at least once during pregnancy. At 16 weeks gestation, women obtained most of their information from books and magazines. Between 25 and 38 weeks gestation, most advice came from family and friends. Participants who reported receiving this advice were significantly older, more educated and of a higher activity level pre-pregnancy. KEY CONCLUSIONS Levels of maternal exercise may decline during pregnancy both as a result of the physical changes of pregnancy and from a combination of social and psychological factors. Present health education may be failing to correct inaccurate perceptions of the risks associated with physical exercise in pregnancy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Improving the quantity and quality of information related to physical exercise has the potential to correct inaccurate perceptions and confer several benefits on maternal and fetal health. Effective intervention strategies should focus not only on the pregnant woman but also extend to her family, friends and exercise provider.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.midw.2003.11.003

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 280

Metadata

Authors
Clarke, P. E., & Gross, H.
Venue
Midwifery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-06
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
133-141
ISSN
0266-6138 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024964900
Cited by
280
References
29
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Women's behaviour, beliefs and information sources about physical exercise in pregnancy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.midw.2003.11.003
The paper
Clarke, P. E., & Gross, H. (2004). Women's behaviour, beliefs and information sources about physical exercise in pregnancy. Midwifery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2003.11.003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.