Cited by 14Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Depression in pregnant women hospitalized due to intrauterine growth restriction: prevalence and associated factors

Tsakiridis, Ioannis, Dagklis, Themistoklis, Zerva, Christina, Mamopoulos, Apostolos, Athanasiadis, Apostolos, Papazisis, Georgios·2019·Midwifery

Abstract

Objective Pregnancies complicated with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) may require hospitalization in a high-risk pregnancy unit (HRPU). A complicated pregnancy and hospital admission may negatively affect the pregnant woman's mental health. Several factors have been identified as possible risk factors for depression, which is proven to lead to several adverse perinatal outcomes. The purpose of this study was to screen for depression in women admitted to an HRPU due to IUGR pregnancy and also to identify associated risk factors.Study design All pregnant women admitted at ≥ 24 gestational weeks with the diagnosis of IUGR were eligible for the study. The Greek version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale was used as screening tool on admission. A cut-off score ≥ 13 was used to identify depression, while possible risk factors were also investigated.Results Overall, 73 women were eligible for the study and agreed to complete the questionnaire. The mean age of the pregnant women was 31.4 ± 6.7 years and the mean gestational week at admission was 33.6 ± 2.9 weeks. The prevalence of depressive symptoms (score ≥ 13) was 32.9% (24/73). In the multivariable model, depressive symptoms were significantly correlated with lower gestational age (OR: 3.459 95%CI: 1.124-10.648) and smoking during pregnancy (OR: 3.926 95% CI: 1.141-13.507).Conclusions About one third of pregnant women hospitalized in the HRPU with IUGR pregnancies showed signs of depression at the time of admission. Early-IUGR and smoking were found to be associated with antenatal depressive symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.midw.2018.12.008

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsakiridis, I., Dagklis, T., Zerva, C., Mamopoulos, A., Athanasiadis, A., & Papazisis, G.
Affiliations
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
Corresponding author
Papazisis, Georgios
Venue
Midwifery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
70
Pages
71-75
ISSN
0266-6138 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2903774293
Cited by
14
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Midwifery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
antenatal depression, fetal growth restriction, high-risk pregnancy, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, depression prevalence, risk factors, smoking during pregnancy, gestational age, maternal mental health
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Fetal Growth Retardation, Greece, Hospitalization, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Risk Factors, Prevalence, Chi-Square Distribution, Depression, Postpartum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review