Cited by 80Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Neonatal HealthcarePregnancy-related medical research

Epidemiology of antenatal depression among women with high-risk pregnancies due to obstetric complications: a scoping review

Tsakiridis, Ioannis, Bousi, Vasiliki, Dagklis, Themistoklis, Sardeli, Chrysanthi, Nikolopoulou, Vasiliki, Papazisis, Georgios·2019·Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Abstract

Purpose Antenatal depression is a common mental health problem among pregnant women that negatively affects maternal and neonatal outcomes. Women with obstetric complications, defined as high-risk pregnancies, seem to be at particularly increased risk for developing depressive symptomatology. The purpose of this study was to review the prevalence of antenatal depression among pregnant women with obstetric complications and to identify possible associated factors.Methods A literature search was performed in the PubMed database and a scoping review was conducted to identify studies with data on the prevalence of antenatal depression and associated factors among high-risk pregnancies due to obstetric complications. The included studies were written in English and published up to 31/12/2018.Results The prevalence of antenatal depression among pregnant women with high-risk pregnancies ranges from 12.5 to 44.2% among the reviewed studies. The associated factors significantly associated with antenatal depression include maternal age, maternal education, dwelling place, relationship with the partner, previous psychiatric diagnosis, perceived stress, antenatal attachment, abortion thoughts, smoking, diabetes, parity, number of pregnancies, gestational age, threatened preterm labour, preeclampsia and oligohydramnios.Conclusions Our findings indicate a high prevalence of depressive disorders in women with obstetric complications, suggesting the need for more rigorous screening among this population. The identification of associated factors also merits clinical attention. Further research is warranted to develop evidence-based effective screening strategies and relevant interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00404-019-05270-1

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsakiridis, I., Bousi, V., Dagklis, T., Sardeli, C., Nikolopoulou, V., & Papazisis, G.
Affiliations
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
Corresponding author
Papazisis, Georgios
Venue
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Published
2019-08-17
Volume
300
Issue
4
Pages
849-859
ISSN
  • 0003-9128 (ISSN-L)
  • 0932-0067
  • 1432-0711
OpenAlex
W2968323724
Cited by
80
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
Keywords
antenatal depression, high-risk pregnancy, pregnancy complications, prevalence, risk factors, maternal mental health, preeclampsia, threatened preterm labor, oligohydramnios, diabetes in pregnancy, smoking during pregnancy, parity, depression screening
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Prenatal Care, Pregnancy, High-Risk, Delivery, Obstetric, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review