Cited by 231Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationAI in cancer detectionArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Future of Artificial Intelligence—Machine Learning Trends in Pathology and Medicine

Open access
Hanna, Matthew G., Pantanowitz, Liron, Dash, Rajesh, Harrison, James H., Deebajah, Mustafa, Pantanowitz, Joshua, Rashidi, Hooman H.·2025·Modern Pathology

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are transforming the field of medicine. Health care organizations are now starting to establish management strategies for integrating such platforms (AI-ML toolsets) that leverage the computational power of advanced algorithms to analyze data and to provide better insights that ultimately translate to enhanced clinical decision-making and improved patient outcomes. Emerging AI-ML platforms and trends in pathology and medicine are reshaping the field by offering innovative solutions to enhance diagnostic accuracy, operational workflows, clinical decision support, and clinical outcomes. These tools are also increasingly valuable in pathology research in which they contribute to automated image analysis, biomarker discovery, drug development, clinical trials, and productive analytics. Other related trends include the adoption of ML operations for managing models in clinical settings, the application of multimodal and multiagent AI to utilize diverse data sources, expedited translational research, and virtualized education for training and simulation. As the final chapter of our AI educational series, this review article delves into the current adoption, future directions, and transformative potential of AI-ML platforms in pathology and medicine, discussing their applications, benefits, challenges, and future perspectives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.modpat.2025.100705

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Weil, 2024, Tort law as a tool for mitigating catastrophic risk from artificial Intelligence, SSRN Journal
  2. Allain, 2013, From jeopardy! to jaundice: the medical liability implications of Dr. Watson and other artificial intelligence systems, LA Law Rev, 73, 4

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hanna, M. G., Pantanowitz, L., Dash, R., Harrison, J. H., Deebajah, M., Pantanowitz, J., & Rashidi, H. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
Venue
Modern Pathology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-04
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
100705
ISSN
0893-3952 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406062782
Cited by
231
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 137 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 1
FWCI
11.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Modern Pathology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
artificial intelligence in healthcare, machine learning, pathology, clinical decision support, automated image analysis, biomarker discovery, drug development, clinical trials, MLOps, multimodal AI, translational research, online learning, diagnostic accuracy
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Pathology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review