Cited by 128Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsEpigenetics and DNA MethylationChromatin Remodeling and Cancer

Transcriptional Silencers in Drosophila Serve a Dual Role as Transcriptional Enhancers in Alternate Cellular Contexts

Open access
Gisselbrecht, Stephen S., Palagi, Alexandre, Kurland, Jesse V., Rogers, Julia M., Ozadam, Hakan, Zhan, Ye, Dekker, Job, Bulyk, Martha L.·2020·Molecular Cell

Abstract

A major challenge in biology is to understand how complex gene expression patterns are encoded in the genome. While transcriptional enhancers have been studied extensively, few transcriptional silencers have been identified, and they remain poorly understood. Here, we used a novel strategy to screen hundreds of sequences for tissue-specific silencer activity in whole Drosophila embryos. Almost all of the transcriptional silencers that we identified were also active enhancers in other cellular contexts. These elements are bound by more transcription factors than non-silencers. A subset of these silencers forms long-range contacts with promoters. Deletion of a silencer caused derepression of its target gene. Our results challenge the common practice of treating enhancers and silencers as separate classes of regulatory elements and suggest the possibility that thousands or more bifunctional CRMs remain to be discovered in Drosophila and 10 4-10 5 in humans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.10.004

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some enhancers are marked with H3K27me3 alone and are considered to be Polycomb-repressed.

    “Finally, some enhancers are marked with H3K27me3 alone and are considered to be “Polycomb-repressed” [139–141].”

    From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [140]

    The Results section on element selection describes H3K27me3 as a repressive mark at candidate regulatory elements, including elements that may act as enhancers in another cell type. It does not establish that those enhancers carry H3K27me3 alone or classify them as Polycomb-repressed. In the Results section on validated silencers, only 4 of 29 overlapped Polycomb response elements. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 78

  1. Anders S, and Huber W (2010). Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol 11, R106. 20979621 PMC3218662
  2. Atkinson TJ, and Halfon MS (2014). REGULATION OF GENE EXPRESSION IN THE GENOMIC CONTEXT. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 9, e201401001. 24688749 PMC3962188
  3. Attrill H, Falls K, Goodman JL, Millburn GH, Antonazzo G, Rey AJ, Marygold SJ, and the FlyBase, c. (2016). FlyBase: establishing a Gene Group resource for Drosophila melanogaster. Nucleic Acids Res 44, D786– D792. 26467478 PMC4702782
  4. Barolo S, Carver LA, and Posakony JW (2000). GFP and beta-Galactosidase Transformation Vectors for Promoter/Enhancer Analysis in Drosophila. Biotechniques 29, 726– 732. 11056799
  5. Belaghzal H, Dekker J, and Gibcus JH (2017). Hi-C 2.0: An optimized Hi-C procedure for high-resolution genome-wide mapping of chromosome conformation. Methods 123, 56– 65. 28435001 PMC5522765
  6. Berger MF, Philippakis AA, Qureshi AM, He FS, Estep PW 3rd, and Bulyk ML (2006). Compact, universal DNA microarrays to comprehensively determine transcription-factor binding site specificities. Nat Biotechnol 24, 1429– 1435. 16998473 PMC4419707
  7. Bessis A, Champtiaux N, Chatelin L, and Changeux J-P (1997). The neuron-restrictive silencer element: A dual enhancer/silencer crucial for patterned expression of a nicotinic receptor gene in the brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94, 5906. PMC20879 9159173
  8. Bonn S, Zinzen RP, Girardot C, Gustafson EH, Perez-Gonzalez A, Delhomme N, Ghavi-Helm Y, Wilczyήski B, Riddell A, and Furlong EEM (2012). Tissue-specific analysis of chromatin state identifies temporal signatures of enhancer activity during embryonic development. Nature genetics 44, 148. 22231485
  9. Calo E, and Wysocka J (2013). Modification of Enhancer Chromatin: What, How, and Why? Mol Cell 49, 825– 837. 23473601 PMC3857148
  10. Celniker SE, Dillon LAL, Gerstein MB, Gunsalus KC, Henikoff S, Karpen GH, Kellis M, Lai EC, Lieb JD, MacAlpine DM, (2009). Unlocking the secrets of the genome. Nature 459, 927. 19536255 PMC2843545
  11. Chopra VS, Kong N, and Levine M (2012). Transcriptional repression via antilooping in the Drosophila embryo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 9460. PMC3386088 22645339
  12. Ciglar L, Girardot C, Wilczyński B, Braun M, and Furlong EEM (2014). Coordinated repression and activation of two transcriptional programs stabilizes cell fate during myogenesis. Development 141, 2633. 24961800 PMC4146391
  13. Courey AJ, and Jia S (2001). Transcriptional repression: the long and the short of it. Genes & development 15, 2786– 2796. 11691830
  14. Dernburg AF, Broman KW, Fung JC, Marshall WF, Philips J, Agard DA, and Sedat JW (1996). Perturbation of Nuclear Architecture by Long-Distance Chromosome Interactions. Cell 85, 745– 759. 8646782
  15. Duan H, Skeath JB, and Nguyen HT (2001). Drosophila Lame duck, a novel member of the Gli superfamily, acts as a key regulator of myogenesis by controlling fusion-competent myoblast development. Development 128, 4489. 11714674
  16. Dunin-Borkowski OM, and Brown NH (1995). Mammalian CD2 Is an Effective Heterologous Marker of the Cell Surface in Drosophila. Developmental biology 168, 689– 693. 7729601
  17. Eagen KP, Aiden EL, and Kornberg RD (2017). Polycomb-mediated chromatin loops revealed by a subkilobase-resolution chromatin interaction map. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, 8764. PMC5565414 28765367
  18. Erceg J, Pakozdi T, Marco-Ferreres R, Ghavi-Helm Y, Girardot C, Bracken AP, and Furlong EEM (2017). Dual functionality of cis-regulatory elements as developmental enhancers and Polycomb response elements. Genes & development 31, 590– 602. 28381411 PMC5393054
  19. Ernst J, and Kellis M (2010). Discovery and characterization of chromatin states for systematic annotation of the human genome. Nature Biotechnology 28, 817. PMC2919626 20657582
  20. Ernst J, Kheradpour P, Mikkelsen TS, Shoresh N, Ward LD, Epstein CB, Zhang X, Wang L, Issner R, Coyne M, (2011). Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types. Nature 473, 43. 21441907 PMC3088773
  21. Filion GJ, van Bemmel JG, Braunschweig U, Talhout W, Kind J, Ward LD, Brugman W, de Castro IJ, Kerkhoven RM, Bussemaker HJ, (2010). Systematic Protein Location Mapping Reveals Five Principal Chromatin Types in Drosophila Cells. Cell 143, 212– 224. 20888037 PMC3119929
  22. Fry CJ, and Farnham PJ (1999). Context-dependent Transcriptional Regulation. Journal of Biological Chemistry 274, 29583– 29586. 10514422
  23. Fujioka M, Wu X, and Jaynes JB (2009). A chromatin insulator mediates transgene homing and very long-range enhancer-promoter communication. Development 136, 3077. 19675129 PMC2730365
  24. Gaertner B, Johnston J, Chen K, Wallaschek N, Paulson A, Garruss Alexander S., Gaudenz K, De Kumar B, Krumlauf R, and Zeitlinger J (2012). Poised RNA Polymerase II Changes over Developmental Time and Prepares Genes for Future Expression. Cell Reports 2, 1670– 1683. 23260668 PMC3572839
  25. Gallo SM, Gerrard DT, Miner D, Simich M, Des Soye B, Bergman CM, and Halfon MS (2011). REDfly v3.0: toward a comprehensive database of transcriptional regulatory elements in Drosophila. Nucleic Acids Res 39, D118– D123. 20965965 PMC3013816
  26. Gao Q, and Finkelstein R (1998). Targeting gene expression to the head: the Drosophila orthodenticle gene is a direct target of the Bicoid morphogen. Development 125, 4185. 9753673
  27. Gisselbrecht SS, Barrera LA, Porsch M, Aboukhalil A, Estep Iii PW, Vedenko A, Palagi A, Kim Y, Zhu X, Busser BW, (2013). Highly parallel assays of tissue-specific enhancers in whole Drosophila embryos. Nature Methods 10, 774. 23852450 PMC3733245
  28. Gratz SJ, Ukken FP, Rubinstein CD, Thiede G, Donohue LK, Cummings AM, and O’Connor-Giles KM (2014). Highly Specific and Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-Catalyzed Homology-Directed Repair in Drosophila. Genetics 196, 961. 24478335 PMC3982687
  29. Gray S, and Levine M (1996). Short-range transcriptional repressors mediate both quenching and direct repression within complex loci in Drosophila. Genes & development 10, 700– 710. 8598297
  30. Gray S, Szymanski P, and Levine M (1994). Short-range repression permits multiple enhancers to function autonomously within a complex promoter. Genes & development 8, 1829– 1838. 7958860
  31. Häder T, Wainwright D, Shandala T, Saint R, Taubert H, Brönner G, and Jäckle H (2000). Receptor tyrosine kinase signaling regulates different modes of Groucho-dependent control of Dorsal. Current Biology 10, 51– 54. 10660305
  32. He Q, Bardet AF, Patton B, Purvis J, Johnston J, Paulson A, Gogol M, Stark A, and Zeitlinger J (2011). High conservation of transcription factor binding and evidence for combinatorial regulation across six Drosophila species. Nature genetics 43, 414. 21478888
  33. Hume MA, Barrera LA, Gisselbrecht SS, and Bulyk ML (2015). UniPROBE, update 2015: new tools and content for the online database of protein-binding microarray data on protein–DNA interactions. Nucleic Acids Res 43, D117– D122. 25378322 PMC4383892
  34. Jiang J, Cai H, Zhou Q, and Levine M (1993). Conversion of a dorsal-dependent silencer into an enhancer: evidence for dorsal corepressors. The EMBO journal 12, 3201– 3209. 8344257 PMC413587
  35. Jiang N, Emberly E, Cuvier O, and Hart CM (2009). Genome-Wide Mapping of Boundary Element-Associated Factor (BEAF) Binding Sites in Drosophila melanogaster Links BEAF to Transcription. Mol Cell Biol 29, 3556– 3568. 19380483 PMC2698748
  36. Kallunki P, Edelman GM, and Jones FS (1998). The neural restrictive silencer element can act as both a repressor and enhancer of L1 cell adhesion molecule gene expression during postnatal development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 95, 3233. PMC19725 9501246
  37. Karmodiya K, Krebs AR, Oulad-Abdelghani M, Kimura H, and Tora L (2012). H3K9 and H3K14 acetylation co-occur at many gene regulatory elements, while H3K14ac marks a subset of inactive inducible promoters in mouse embryonic stem cells. BMC Genomics 13, 424. 22920947 PMC3473242
  38. Kassis JA, Kennison JA, and Tamkun JW (2017). Polycomb and Trithorax Group Genes in Drosophila. Genetics 206, 1699. 28778878 PMC5560782
  39. Kehayova P, Monahan K, Chen W, and Maniatis T (2011). Regulatory elements required for the activation and repression of the protocadherin-α gene cluster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 17195. PMC3193253 21949399
  40. Koenecke N, Johnston J, Gaertner B, Natarajan M, and Zeitlinger J (2016). Genome-wide identification of Drosophila dorso-ventral enhancers by differential histone acetylation analysis. Genome Biology 17, 196. 27678375 PMC5037609
  41. Koike S, Schaeffer L, and Changeux JP (1995). Identification of a DNA element determining synaptic expression of the mouse acetylcholine receptor delta-subunit gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 92, 10624. PMC40664 7479853
  42. Lajoie BR, Dekker J, and Kaplan N (2015). The Hitchhiker’s guide to Hi-C analysis: Practical guidelines. Methods 72, 65– 75. 25448293 PMC4347522
  43. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, and Salzberg SL (2009). Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biology 10, R25. 19261174 PMC2690996
  44. Lenhard B, and Wasserman W (2002). TFBS: Computational framework for transcription factor binding site analysis. Bioinformatics 18, 1135– 1136. 12176838
  45. Leptin M (1991). twist and snail as positive and negative regulators during Drosophila mesoderm development. Genes & development 5, 1568– 1576. 1884999
  46. Mariani L, Weinand K, Vedenko A, Barrera LA, and Bulyk ML (2017). Identification of Human Lineage-Specific Transcriptional Coregulators Enabled by a Glossary of Binding Modules and Tunable Genomic Backgrounds. Cell Systems 5, 187– 201.e187. 28957653 PMC5657590
  47. Matthews NE, and White R (2019). Chromatin Architecture in the Fly: Living without CTCF/Cohesin Loop Extrusion? BioEssays 0, 1900048. 31264253
  48. Miele A, and Dekker J (2008). Long-range chromosomal interactions and gene regulation. Molecular BioSystems 4, 1046– 1057. 18931780 PMC2653627
  49. Muratoglu S, Hough B, Mon ST, and Fossett N (2007). The GATA factor Serpent cross-regulates lozenge and u-shaped expression during Drosophila blood cell development. Developmental biology 311, 636– 649. 17869239 PMC2132443
  50. Nègre N, Brown CD, Shah PK, Kheradpour P, Morrison CA, Henikoff J, Feng X, Ahmad K, Russell S, White RAH, (2010). A Comprehensive Map of Insulator Elements for the Drosophila Genome. PLoS Genet 6, e1000814. 20084099 PMC2797089
  51. Nieto MA (2002). The snail superfamily of zinc-finger transcription factors. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 3, 155. 11994736
  52. Ogbourne S, and Antalis TM (1998). Transcriptional control and the role of silencers in transcriptional regulation in eukaryotes. Biochemical Journal 331, 1– 14. 9512455 PMC1219314
  53. Ogiyama Y, Schuettengruber B, Papadopoulos GL, Chang J-M, and Cavalli G (2018). Polycomb-Dependent Chromatin Looping Contributes to Gene Silencing during Drosophila Development. Mol Cell 71, 73– 88.e75. 30008320
  54. Ohtsuki S, Levine M, and Cai HN (1998). Different core promoters possess distinct regulatory activities in the Drosophila embryo. Genes & development 12, 547– 556. 9472023 PMC316525
  55. Petrykowska HM, Vockley CM, and Elnitski L (2008). Detection and characterization of silencers and enhancer-blockers in the greater CFTR locus. Genome research 18, 1238– 1246. 18436892 PMC2493434
  56. Pfeiffer BD, Jenett A, Hammonds AS, Ngo T-TB, Misra S, Murphy C, Scully A, Carlson JW, Wan KH, Laverty TR, (2008). Tools for neuroanatomy and neurogenetics in Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 9715. PMC2447866 18621688
  57. Prasad MS, and Paulson AF (2011). A combination of enhancer/silencer modules regulates spatially restricted expression of cadherin-7 in neural epithelium. Developmental Dynamics 240, 1756– 1768. 21674686 PMC3147117
  58. Quinlan Aaron R (2014). BEDTools: The Swiss-Army Tool for Genome Feature Analysis. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics 47, 11.12.11– 11.12.34. PMC4213956 25199790
  59. Rao Suhas S.P., Huntley Miriam H., Durand Neva C., Stamenova Elena K., Bochkov Ivan D., Robinson James T., Sanborn Adrian L., Machol I, Omer Arina D., Lander Eric S., (2014). A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping. Cell 159, 1665– 1680. 25497547 PMC5635824
  60. Rembold M, Ciglar L, Yáñez-Cuna JO, Zinzen RP, Girardot C, Jain A, Welte MA, Stark A, Leptin M, and Furlong EEM (2014). A conserved role for Snail as a potentiator of active transcription. Genes & development 28, 167– 181. 24402316 PMC3909790
  61. Rosenbloom KR, Armstrong J, Barber GP, Casper J, Clawson H, Diekhans M, Dreszer TR, Fujita PA, Guruvadoo L, Haeussler M, (2015). The UCSC Genome Browser database: 2015 update. Nucleic Acids Res 43, D670– D681. 25428374 PMC4383971
  62. Roy S, Ernst J, Kharchenko PV, Kheradpour P, Negre N, Eaton ML, Landolin JM, Bristow CA, Ma L, Lin MF, (2010). Identification of Functional Elements and Regulatory Circuits by Drosophila modENCODE. Science 330, 1787– 1797. 21177974 PMC3192495
  63. Schaeffer HJ, Forsthoefel NR, and Cushman JC (1995). Identification of enhancer and silencer regions involved in salt-responsive expression of Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) genes in the facultative halophyte Mesembryanthemum crystallinum. Plant Molecular Biology 28, 205– 218. 7599307
  64. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, and Eliceiri KW (2012). NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of Image Analysis. Nature methods 9, 671– 675. 22930834 PMC5554542
  65. Shavit Y, and Lio P (2014). Combining a wavelet change point and the Bayes factor for analysing chromosomal interaction data. Molecular BioSystems 10, 1576– 1585. 24710657
  66. Shokri L, Inukai S, Hafner A, Weinand K, Hens K, Vedenko A, Gisselbrecht SS, Dainese R, Bischof J, Furger E, (2019). A Comprehensive Drosophila melanogaster Transcription Factor Interactome. Cell Reports 27, 955– 970.e957. 30995488 PMC6485956
  67. Stathopoulos A, and Levine M (2005). Localized repressors delineate the neurogenic ectoderm in the early Drosophila embryo. Developmental biology 280, 482– 493. 15882587
  68. Thomas S, Li X-Y, Sabo PJ, Sandstrom R, Thurman RE, Canfield TK, Giste E, Fisher W, Hammonds A, Celniker SE, (2011). Dynamic reprogramming of chromatin accessibility during Drosophila embryo development. Genome Biology 12, R43. 21569360 PMC3219966
  69. Thurman RE, Rynes E, Humbert R, Vierstra J, Maurano MT, Haugen E, Sheffield NC, Stergachis AB, Wang H, Vernot B, (2012). The accessible chromatin landscape of the human genome. Nature 489, 75. 22955617 PMC3721348
  70. van Riel JJG (2014). Identification of epigenomic patterns to annotate regulatory elements in the human genome. In Department of Biomedical Sciences (Utrecht University), pp. 35.
  71. Visel A, Blow MJ, Li Z, Zhang T, Akiyama JA, Holt A, Plajzer-Frick I, Shoukry M, Wright C, Chen F, (2009). ChIP-seq accurately predicts tissue-specific activity of enhancers. Nature 457, 854. 19212405 PMC2745234
  72. Wang KC, and Chang HY (2018). Epigenomics. Circulation Research 122, 1191– 1199. 29700067 PMC5929475
  73. Warner J, Philippakis A, Jaeger S, He F, Lin J, and Bulyk M (2008). Systematic identification of mammalian regulatory motifs’ target genes and their functions. Nature Methods 5, 347– 353. 18311145 PMC2708972
  74. Weirauch Matthew T., Yang A, Albu M, Cote AG, Montenegro-Montero A, Drewe P, Najafabadi Hamed S., Lambert Samuel A., Mann I, Cook K, (2014). Determination and Inference of Eukaryotic Transcription Factor Sequence Specificity. Cell 158, 1431– 1443. 25215497 PMC4163041
  75. Zhang Y, Liu T, Meyer CA, Eeckhoute J, Johnson DS, Bernstein BE, Nusbaum C, Myers RM, Brown M, Li W, (2008). Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biology 9, R137. 18798982 PMC2592715
  76. Zhou VW, Goren A, and Bernstein BE (2011). Charting histone modifications and the functional organization of mammalian genomes. Nature Reviews Genetics 12, 7. 21116306
  77. Zhu LJ, Christensen RG, Kazemian M, Hull CJ, Enuameh MS, Basciotta MD, Brasefield JA, Zhu C, Asriyan Y, Lapointe DS, (2011). FlyFactorSurvey: a database of Drosophila transcription factor binding specificities determined using the bacterial one-hybrid system. Nucleic Acids Res 39, D111– D117. 21097781 PMC3013762
  78. Zhu Q, and Halfon MS (2009). Complex organizational structure of the genome revealed by genome-wide analysis of single and alternative promoters in Drosophila melanogaster. BMC Genomics 10, 9. 19128496 PMC2631479

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gisselbrecht, S. S., Palagi, A., Kurland, J. V., Rogers, J. M., Ozadam, H., Zhan, Y., Dekker, J., & Bulyk, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Bulyk, Martha L.
Venue
Molecular Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
77
Issue
2
Pages
324-337.e8
ISSN
1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2984395420
Cited by
128
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Keywords
transcriptional silencer, enhancers, Drosophila, enhancer silencing, cellular context, enhancer function, chromatin regulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Drosophila, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Male, Transcription, Genetic, Animals, Genetically Modified, Silencer Elements, Transcriptional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review