Cited by 676Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringChromatin Remodeling and Cancer

Systematic mapping of functional enhancer–promoter connections with CRISPR interference

Open access
Fulco, Charles P., Munschauer, Mathias, Anyoha, Rockwell, Munson, Glen, Grossman, Sharon R., Perez, Elizabeth M., Kane, Michael, Cleary, Brian +2 more·2016·Science

Abstract

CRISPR screens illuminate enhancer function: The noncoding regions around a gene that control the transcription of the protein-coding region are difficult to identify. Leveraging a CRISPR interference system (CRISPRi), Fulco et al. identified enhancer-promoter connections to map specific noncoding regions affecting gene regulation for the GATA1 and MYC loci (see the Perspective by Einstein and Yeo). Going forward, such CRISPRi-mapping can be used to evaluate promoter-enhancer screens functionally in an unbiased way. Science , this issue p. 769 ; see also p. 705

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aag2445

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Enhancers E1-E4 control expression of the PVT1 long noncoding RNA.

    “Finally, we explored the potential utility of CRISPRoff for silencing promoter-distal elements by targeting enhancers that control the expression of the PVT1 long noncoding RNA (Cho et al., 2018; Fulco et al., 2016).”

    From Genome-wide programmable transcriptional memory by CRISPR-based epigenome editing (2021) · cites this paper as Fulco et al., 2016

    The passage describing the seven elements (section labeled Abstract; page unavailable) says e1–e7 are enhancers that control MYC expression, not PVT1 expression. It identifies e3 and e4 as alternative transcription start sites for PVT1, but says they likely affect cellular proliferation through direct regulation of MYC. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Histone modification and cofactor binding are enriched but not completely predictive of enhancer activity.

    “Although enriched, histone modification and cofactor binding is not completely predictive of enhancer activity54,58,72,77,105.”

    From Towards a comprehensive catalogue of validated and target-linked human enhancers (2020) · cites this paper as [105]

    The supplied Abstract passages report that H3K27ac signal distinguished most functional MYC enhancers but did not rank their effects correctly, supporting the point that a histone modification is informative but not fully predictive. They also report transcription-factor binding at the seven enhancers, but do not establish that cofactor binding is enriched or test its predictive value. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CRISPRoff can perturb enhancers.

    “Our initial experiments demonstrate CRISPRoff can perturb enhancers, opening the potential to target genome elements that control tissue-specific gene expression (Fulco et al., 2016; Tarjan et al., 2019).”

    From Genome-wide programmable transcriptional memory by CRISPR-based epigenome editing (2021) · cites this paper as Fulco et al., 2016

    The paper reports that targeting enhancers with CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) reduced GATA1 expression, supporting the general point that enhancers can be perturbed. It does not report experiments with CRISPRoff, so it does not establish that CRISPRoff specifically can perturb enhancers (results described under the Abstract section; page not supplied). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CRISPR-based approaches have confirmed that promoters often receive signals from multiple functional enhancers.

    “CRISPR-based approaches have confirmed that promoters often receive signals from multiple functional enhancers [479, 480].”

    From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [479]

    The paper’s concluding summary (page not specified in our copy) says CRISPRi revealed coordinated activity of multiple enhancers controlling a single gene at the MYC and GATA1 loci. That supports the existence of such connections, but the study of these loci does not establish that promoters often receive signals from multiple functional enhancers generally. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • When comparing Borzoi, Enformer and a distance-to-TSS baseline on classifying measured positive from negative enhancer-gene interactions, Borzoi has superior AUPRC and AUROC at all distances.

    “When comparing Borzoi, Enformer and a distance-to-TSS baseline on their ability to classify measured positive from negative enhancer–gene interactions in data from previous works60–65, we find that Borzoi has superior average precision (AUPRC) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) at all distances (Fig. 4c and Extended Data Fig. 5a).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 86 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fulco, C. P., Munschauer, M., Anyoha, R., Munson, G., Grossman, S. R., Perez, E. M., Kane, M., Cleary, B., Lander, E. S., & Engreitz, J. M.
Affiliations
Broad Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Lander, Eric S.
  • Engreitz, Jesse M.
Venue
Science
Published
2016-11-11
Volume
354
Issue
6313
Pages
769-773
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2524507363
Cited by
643
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 3
FWCI
31.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Broad Institute
  • National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship
  • Fannie and John Hertz Foundation
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Research Fellowship
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007753)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Keywords
distal enhancers, CRISPR interference, non-coding regulatory elements, c-Myc, GATA-1, chromatin state, chromosome conformation, transcriptional regulatory networks, cell proliferation, target gene identification
MeSH terms
Chromosome Mapping, Disease, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc, K562 Cells, Cell Proliferation, GATA1 Transcription Factor, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review