Cited by 38Fibroblast Growth Factor ResearchHypothalamic control of reproductive hormonesRegulation of Appetite and Obesity

Fibroblast growth factor 21 has no direct role in regulating fertility in female mice

Open access
Singhal, Garima, Douris, Nicholas, Fish, Alan J., Zhang, Xinyao, Adams, Andrew C., Flier, Jeffrey S., Pissios, Pavlos, Maratos-Flier, Eleftheria·2016·Molecular Metabolism

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Reproduction is an energetically expensive process. Insufficient calorie reserves, signaled to the brain through peripheral signals such as leptin, suppress fertility. Recently, fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) was implicated as a signal from the liver to the hypothalamus that directly inhibits the hypothalamic-gonadotropin axis during fasting and starvation. However, FGF21 itself increases metabolic rate and can induce weight loss, which suggests that the effects of FGF21 on fertility may not be direct and may reflect changes in energy balance. METHODS: To address this important question, we evaluated fertility in several mouse models with elevated FGF21 levels including ketogenic diet fed mice, fasted mice, mice treated with exogenous FGF21 and transgenic mice over-expressing FGF21. RESULTS: We find that ketogenic diet fed mice remain fertile despite significant elevation in serum FGF21 levels. Absence of FGF21 does not alter transient infertility induced by fasting. Centrally infused FGF21 does not suppress fertility despite its efficacy in inducing browning of inguinal white adipose tissue. Furthermore, a high fat diet (HFD) can restore fertility of female FGF21-overexpressing mice, a model of growth restriction, even in the presence of supraphysiological serum FGF21 levels. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that FGF21 is not a direct physiological regulator of fertility in mice. The infertility observed in FGF21 overexpressing mice is likely driven by the increased energy expenditure and consequent excess calorie requirements resulting from high FGF21 levels.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molmet.2016.05.010

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Direct infusion of FGF21 into the brain at concentrations sufficient to acutely increase energy expenditure failed to alter the estrus cycle.

    “In addition, the direct infusion of FGF21 into the brain at concentrations sufficient to acutely increase energy expenditure failed to alter the estrus cycle (119), suggesting that FGF21 may not function acutely to regulate female fertility.”
  • Fgf21 transgenic mice are infertile on a chow diet, but this infertility is reversed by high-fat diet feeding.

    “While Fgf21 transgenic mice are infertile on a chow diet, this infertility is reversed by high-fat diet feeding (119).”
  • FGF21 has been shown to affect female reproduction.

    “FGF21 has also been shown to affect female reproduction (100, 119).”
  • Female mice that over-express FGF21 are infertile.

    “Female mice that over-express FGF21 are infertile, but whether this is a direct effect of FGF21 on fertility or rather a secondary consequence of FGF21-induced energy expenditure and relative caloric insufficiency has been disputed.”
  • The infertility phenotype in FGF21-overexpressing mice is due to caloric insufficiency from chronic energy expenditure.

    “However, a separate study suggests that this phenotype is due to caloric insufficiency from chronic energy expenditure (119).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singhal, G., Douris, N., Fish, A. J., Zhang, X., Adams, A. C., Flier, J. S., Pissios, P., & Maratos-Flier, E.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Pissios, Pavlos
Venue
Molecular Metabolism
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-08
Volume
5
Issue
8
Pages
690-698
ISSN
2212-8778 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2400615331
Cited by
38
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Metabolism (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institute of Health (DK28082)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fibroblast Growth Factor Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Keywords
FGF21, female fertility, energy balance, ketogenic diet, high-fat diet, growth restriction, white adipose tissue browning, leptin, hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review