The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Discovery of small molecule cancer drugs: Successes, challenges and opportunities
Open accessAbstract
The discovery and development of small molecule cancer drugs has been revolutionised over the last decade. Most notably, we have moved from a one‐size‐fits‐all approach that emphasized cytotoxic chemotherapy to a personalised medicine strategy that focuses on the discovery and development of molecularly targeted drugs that exploit the particular genetic addictions, dependencies and vulnerabilities of cancer cells. These exploitable characteristics are increasingly being revealed by our expanding understanding of the abnormal biology and genetics of cancer cells, accelerated by cancer genome sequencing and other high‐throughput genome‐wide campaigns, including functional screens using RNA interference. In this review we provide an overview of contemporary approaches to the discovery of small molecule cancer drugs, highlighting successes, current challenges and future opportunities. We focus in particular on four key steps: Target validation and selection; chemical hit and lead generation; lead optimization to identify a clinical drug candidate; and finally hypothesis‐driven, biomarker‐led clinical trials. Although all of these steps are critical, we view target validation and selection and the conduct of biology‐directed clinical trials as especially important areas upon which to focus to speed progress from gene to drug and to reduce the unacceptably high attrition rate during clinical development. Other challenges include expanding the envelope of druggability for less tractable targets, understanding and overcoming drug resistance, and designing intelligent and effective drug combinations. We discuss not only scientific and technical challenges, but also the assessment and mitigation of risks as well as organizational, cultural and funding problems for cancer drug discovery and development, together with solutions to overcome the ‘Valley of Death’ between basic research and approved medicines. We envisage a future in which addressing these challenges will enhance our rapid progress towards truly personalised medicine for cancer patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lipinski, C. A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B. W., & Feeney, P. J. (2001) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00129-0 · Cited by 18,139
Slamon, D. J., Leyland-Jones, B., Shak, S., Fuchs, H., Paton, V., Bajamonde, A., Fleming, T., Eiermann, W., Wolter, J., Pegram, M., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200103153441101 · Cited by 11,500
Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer
Davies, H., Bignell, G. R., Cox, C., Stephens, P., Edkins, S., Clegg, S., Teague, J., Woffendin, H., Garnett, M. J., Bottomley, W., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00766 · Cited by 10,674
Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation
Chapman, P. B., Hauschild, A., Robert, C., Haanen, J. B., Ascierto, P., Larkin, J., Dummer, R., Garbe, C., Testori, A., Maio, M., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1103782 · Cited by 7,720
Identification of the transforming EML4–ALK fusion gene in non-small-cell lung cancer
Soda, M., Choi, Y. L., Enomoto, M., Takada, S., Yamashita, Y., Ishikawa, S., Fujiwara, S.-I., Watanabe, H., Kurashina, K., Hatanaka, H., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05945 · Cited by 5,439
Abiraterone and Increased Survival in Metastatic Prostate Cancer
de Bono, J. S., Logothetis, C. J., Molina, A., Fizazi, K., North, S., Chu, L., Chi, K. N., Jones, R. J., Goodman, O. B., Saad, F., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1014618 · Cited by 4,407 · cited 1×
“Most recently the CYP171A1 inhibitor abiraterone, which blocks androgen synthesis, has been approved for late stage, castration-resistant prostate cancer and is likely to change the standard of care for these patients (de Bono et al., 2011).”
BackgroundCan the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates?
Kola, I., & Landis, J. (2004) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1470 · Cited by 4,167
Inhibition of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase in Tumors from BRCA Mutation Carriers
Fong, P. C., Boss, D. S., Yap, T. A., Tutt, A., Wu, P., Mergui-Roelvink, M., Mortimer, P., Swaisland, H., Lau, A., O'Connor, M. J., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0900212 · Cited by 3,634
How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry's grand challenge
Paul, S. M., Mytelka, D. S., Dunwiddie, C. T., Persinger, C. C., Munos, B. H., Lindborg, S. R., & Schacht, A. L. (2010) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3078 · Cited by 3,566
Hopkins, A. L., & Groom, C. R. (2002) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd892 · Cited by 3,305
Cited by
Natural products as sources of new drugs from 1981 to 2014
Newman, D. J., & Cragg, G. M. (2016) · Journal of Natural Products · doi:10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b01055 · Cited by 5,858
Hijacking the E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Cereblon to Efficiently Target BRD4
Lu, J., Qian, Y., Altieri, M., Dong, H., Wang, J., Raina, K., Hines, J., Winkler, J. D., Crew, A. P., Coleman, K., et al. (2015) · Chemistry & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.05.009 · Cited by 1,140
Combinatorial drug therapy for cancer in the post-genomic era
Al-Lazikani, B., Banerji, U., & Workman, P. (2012) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2284 · Cited by 1,070
Self-citationScreening out irrelevant cell-based models of disease
Horvath, P., Aulner, N., Bickle, M., Davies, A. M., Nery, E. D., Ebner, D., Montoya, M. C., Östling, P., Pietiäinen, V., Price, L. S., et al. (2016) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2016.175 · Cited by 525
Phenotypic screening in cancer drug discovery — past, present and future
Moffat, J. G., Rudolph, J., & Bailey, D. (2014) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd4366 · Cited by 507
Therapeutic advances of miRNAs: A preclinical and clinical update
Chakraborty, C., Sharma, A. R., Sharma, G., & Lee, S.-S. (2021) · Journal of Advanced Research · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2020.08.012 · Cited by 402
Pharmaceutical applications of cyanobacteria—A review
Vijayakumar, S., & Menakha, M. (2015) · Journal of Acute Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.jacme.2015.02.004 · Cited by 205
FRET Based Biosensor: Principle Applications Recent Advances and Challenges
Verma, A. K., Noumani, A., Yadav, A. K., & Solanki, P. R. (2023) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics13081375 · Cited by 202
An implantable microdevice to perform high-throughput in vivo drug sensitivity testing in tumors
Jonas, O., Landry, H. M., Fuller, J. E., Santini, J. T., Baselga, J., Tepper, R. I., Cima, M. J., & Langer, R. (2015) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3010564 · Cited by 189
Hypoxia Inducible Factor Pathway Inhibitors as Anticancer Therapeutics
Burroughs, S. K., Kaluz, S., Wang, D., Wang, K., Van Meir, E. G., & Wang, B. (2013) · Future Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.4155/fmc.13.17 · Cited by 140
In-silico Prediction of Synergistic Anti-Cancer Drug Combinations Using Multi-omics Data
Celebi, R., Bear Don’t Walk, O., Movva, R., Alpsoy, S., & Dumontier, M. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-45236-6 · Cited by 120
Miles, S. L., Fischer, A. P., Joshi, S. J., & Niles, R. M. (2015) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1878-5 · Cited by 51
Eladl, O. (2025) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2025.117297 · Cited by 44
TextGrad: Automatic "Differentiation" via Text
Yuksekgonul, M., Bianchi, F., Boen, J., Liu, S., Huang, Z., Guestrin, C., & Zou, J. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.07496 · Cited by 12
Ritchie, J. W. A., & Williams, R. J. (2015) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2015.03.006 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoelder, S., Clarke, P. A., & Workman, P.
- Venue
- Molecular Oncology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-03-03
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 155-176
- ISSN
- 1574-7891 (ISSN-L)
- 1878-0261
- OpenAlex
- W2089193902
- Cited by
- 587
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 28.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
