Cited by 189Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsNanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery3D Printing in Biomedical Research

An implantable microdevice to perform high-throughput in vivo drug sensitivity testing in tumors

Open access
Jonas, Oliver, Landry, Heather M., Fuller, Jason E., Santini, John T., Baselga, Jose, Tepper, Robert I., Cima, Michael J., Langer, Robert·2015·Science Translational Medicine

Abstract

An implantable microdevice is demonstrated to release microdoses of multiple drugs into confined regions of tumors and allows for assessment of each drug’s efficacy to identify optimal therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/scitranslmed.3010564

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent implantable-device approaches are currently limited to solid tumors and require tumors of a minimum accessible size.

    “There have been recent advancements in this arena involving implantable devices, but these approaches are currently only compatible with solid tumors, and require tumors of a minimum size that are easily accessible30.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jonas, O., Landry, H. M., Fuller, J. E., Santini, J. T., Baselga, J., Tepper, R. I., Cima, M. J., & Langer, R.
Affiliations
  • Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research At MIT (US)
  • Kibur Medical Inc., 29 Newbury Street, Suite 301, Boston, MA 02116, USA.
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • The David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Venue
Science Translational Medicine
Published
2015-04-22
Volume
7
Issue
284
Pages
284ra57-284ra57
ISSN
  • 1946-6234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-6242
OpenAlex
W2161687028
Cited by
189
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 14
FWCI
11.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science Translational Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (R21-CA177391)
  • Kibur Medical Inc.
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Keywords
implantable microdevices, anticancer drug response, tumor microenvironment, combination therapy, local drug delivery, predictive biomarkers, minimally invasive biopsy, tumor models, precision oncology, drug development
MeSH terms
Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Biopsy, Calibration, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Doxorubicin, Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor, Humans, Neoplasms, Polyethylene Glycols, Polymers, Prognosis, Biomarkers, Tumor, Drug Delivery Systems, Drug Monitoring, Apoptosis, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review