The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Versatile Phenotyping System and Analytics Platform Reveals Diverse Temporal Responses to Water Availability in Setaria
Open accessAbstract
Phenotyping has become the rate-limiting step in using large-scale genomic data to understand and improve agricultural crops. Here, the Bellwether Phenotyping Platform for controlled-environment plant growth and automated multimodal phenotyping is described. The system has capacity for 1140 plants, which pass daily through stations to record fluorescence, near-infrared, and visible images. Plant Computer Vision (PlantCV) was developed as open-source, hardware platform-independent software for quantitative image analysis. In a 4-week experiment, wild Setaria viridis and domesticated Setaria italica had fundamentally different temporal responses to water availability. While both lines produced similar levels of biomass under limited water conditions, Setaria viridis maintained the same water-use efficiency under water replete conditions, while Setaria italica shifted to less efficient growth. Overall, the Bellwether Phenotyping Platform and PlantCV software detected significant effects of genotype and environment on height, biomass, water-use efficiency, color, plant architecture, and tissue water status traits. All ∼ 79,000 images acquired during the course of the experiment are publicly available.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01 · Cited by 86,835
Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment
Hunter, J. D. (2007) · Computing in Science & Engineering · doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 · Cited by 39,249
ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis
Wickham, H. (2009) · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3 · Cited by 14,447
Mechanisms of Salinity Tolerance
Munns, R., & Tester, M. (2008) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911 · Cited by 13,792
Chlorophyll fluorescence—a practical guide
Maxwell, K., & Johnson, G. N. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659 · Cited by 9,347
Bozdogan, H. (1987) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294361 · Cited by 4,468
Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050
Ray, D. K., Mueller, N. D., West, P. C., & Foley, J. A. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066428 · Cited by 3,415
Python for scientific computing
Oliphant, T. E. (2007) · Computing in Science & Engineering · doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.58 · Cited by 3,303 · cited 4×
“PlantCV software is built upon the open-source libraries OpenCV (Bradski, 2000), NumPy (Oliphant, 2007), andMatPlotLib (Hunter, 2007), and contains pipelines built withmodular functions that are currently capable of automated analysis of color and grayscale images from VIS, PSII, and NIR cameras.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTrehalose accumulation in rice plants confers high tolerance levels to different abiotic stresses
Garg, A. K., Kim, J.-K., Owens, T. G., Ranwala, A. P., Choi, Y. D., Kochian, L. V., & Wu, R. J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.252637799 · Cited by 1,346
Computation of Multivariate Normal and t Probabilities
Genz, A., & Bretz, F. (2009) · Lecture Notes in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-01689-9 · Cited by 902
Cited by
Yang, W., Feng, H., Zhang, X., Zhang, J., Doonan, J. H., Batchelor, W. D., Xiong, L., & Yan, J. (2020) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2020.01.008 · Cited by 961
Deep Plant Phenomics: A Deep Learning Platform for Complex Plant Phenotyping Tasks
Ubbens, J. R., & Stavness, I. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01190 · Cited by 371
PlantCV v2: Image analysis software for high-throughput plant phenotyping
Gehan, M. A., Fahlgren, N., Abbasi, A., Berry, J. C., Callen, S. T., Chavez, L., Doust, A. N., Feldman, M. J., Gilbert, K. B., Hodge, J. G., et al. (2017) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.4088 · Cited by 365
Self-citationNakhle, F., & Harfouche, A. L. (2021) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2021.100323 · Cited by 28
“Many types of plant image processing software, such as plant computer vision (PlantCV), 80,81 Image Harvest, and HTPheno, 82 can help with these tasks and extract features from images by automating complex techniques such as histogram thresholding and color analysis.”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Fahlgren, N., Feldman, M., Gehan, M. A., Wilson, M. S., Shyu, C., Bryant, D. W., Hill, S. T., McEntee, C. J., Warnasooriya, S. N., Kumar, I., Ficor, T., Turnipseed, S., Gilbert, K. B., Brutnell, T. P., Carrington, J. C., Mockler, T. C., & Baxter, I.
- Venue
- Molecular Plant
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-10
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1520-1535
- ISSN
- 1674-2052 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968060974
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 24.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Versatile Phenotyping System and Analytics Platform Reveals Diverse Temporal Responses to Water Availability in Setaria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.molp.2015.06.005
- The paper
- Fahlgren, N., Feldman, M., Gehan, M. A., Wilson, M. S., Shyu, C., Bryant, D. W., Hill, S. T., McEntee, C. J., Warnasooriya, S. N., Kumar, I., Ficor, T., Turnipseed, S., Gilbert, K. B., Brutnell, T. P., Carrington, J. C., Mockler, T. C., & Baxter, I. (2015). A Versatile Phenotyping System and Analytics Platform Reveals Diverse Temporal Responses to Water Availability in Setaria. Molecular Plant. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2015.06.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.