Cited by 28Smart Agriculture and AIAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Ready, Steady, Go AI: A practical tutorial on fundamentals of artificial intelligence and its applications in phenomics image analysis

Open access
Nakhle, Farid, Harfouche, Antoine L.·2021·Patterns

Abstract

High-throughput image-based technologies are now widely used in the rapidly developing field of digital phenomics and are generating ever-increasing amounts and diversity of data. Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming a game changer in turning the vast seas of data into valuable predictions and insights. However, this requires specialized programming skills and an in-depth understanding of machine learning, deep learning, and ensemble learning algorithms. Here, we attempt to methodically review the usage of different tools, technologies, and services available to the phenomics data community and show how they can be applied to selected problems in explainable AI-based image analysis. This tutorial provides practical and useful resources for novices and experts to harness the potential of the phenomic data in explainable AI-led breeding programs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100323

Cites

146 of 146 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study investigates several other commonly known data analysis tools to validate the use of phenomics under the TinyML paradigm.

    “It further investigates several other commonly known data analysis tools to validate the use of phenomics under the aegis of TinyML paradigm.”

    From A review on TinyML: State-of-the-art and prospects (2022) · cites this paper as Nakhle and Harfouche, 2021

    The Abstract says the tutorial reviews tools, technologies, and services for phenomics image analysis. The “Moving to the cloud” section explains TinyML and its potential for resource-constrained devices, but does not say the tools were investigated to validate phenomics under a TinyML paradigm. Our copy provides no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The phenomics image analysis uses the PlantVillage tomato dataset along with YOLO3 (based on DarkNet-53 architecture) algorithm for automatic detection of tomato leaves.

    “It uses the PlantVillage tomato dataset along with YOLO3 (based on DarkNet-53 architecture) algorithm for automatic detection of tomato leaves.”

    From A review on TinyML: State-of-the-art and prospects (2022) · cites this paper as Nakhle and Harfouche, 2021

  • The study uses the SegNet algorithm for pixel-wise image segmentation.

    “The study also uses SegNet algorithm for pixel-wise image segmentation.”

    From A review on TinyML: State-of-the-art and prospects (2022) · cites this paper as Nakhle and Harfouche, 2021

  • In Nakhle and Harfouche (2021), a phenomics image analysis is performed based on the classification of tomato leaf disease and spider mites.

    “In (Nakhle and Harfouche, 2021), a phenomics image analysis is performed based on the classification of tomato leaf disease and spider mites.”

    From A review on TinyML: State-of-the-art and prospects (2022) · cites this paper as Nakhle and Harfouche, 2021

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 152 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [11]Moor J. The Dartmouth College artificial intelligence conference: the next fifty years AI Mag. 27 2006 87
  2. [113]Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S., and Guestrin, C. (2016). Why should I trust you? In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (ACM), pp. 1135–1144.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nakhle, F., & Harfouche, A. L.
Affiliations
Università degli Studi della Tuscia (IT)
Corresponding author
Harfouche, Antoine L.
Venue
Patterns
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
2
Issue
9
Pages
100323
ISSN
2666-3899 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3201637954
Cited by
28
References
152
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Patterns (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UnitusOpen (Tuscia University) (submittedVersion)
  • UnitusOpen (Tuscia University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
  • Seventh Framework Programme (311929)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence, phenomics, image analysis, explainable AI, high-throughput phenotyping, plant breeding, machine learning, deep learning, ensemble learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review