Cited by 3,415Climate change impacts on agricultureAgricultural and Food Production StudiesAgricultural Economics and Practices

Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050

Open access
Ray, Deepak K., Mueller, Nathaniel D., West, Paul C., Foley, Jonathan A.·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Several studies have shown that global crop production needs to double by 2050 to meet the projected demands from rising population, diet shifts, and increasing biofuels consumption. Boosting crop yields to meet these rising demands, rather than clearing more land for agriculture has been highlighted as a preferred solution to meet this goal. However, we first need to understand how crop yields are changing globally, and whether we are on track to double production by 2050. Using ∼2.5 million agricultural statistics, collected for ∼13,500 political units across the world, we track four key global crops-maize, rice, wheat, and soybean-that currently produce nearly two-thirds of global agricultural calories. We find that yields in these top four crops are increasing at 1.6%, 1.0%, 0.9%, and 1.3% per year, non-compounding rates, respectively, which is less than the 2.4% per year rate required to double global production by 2050. At these rates global production in these crops would increase by ∼67%, ∼42%, ∼38%, and ∼55%, respectively, which is far below what is needed to meet projected demands in 2050. We present detailed maps to identify where rates must be increased to boost crop production and meet rising demands.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0066428

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Globally, for many agricultural systems, historical realized rates of improvement of on-farm crop productivity have been estimated to be slower than the targets set for future global food security.

    “globally for many agricultural systems the historical realized rates of improvement of on-farm crop productivity have been estimated to be slower than the targets set for future global food security (Fischer et al., 2014;Ray, Mueller, West, & Foley, 2013).”

    From Integrating genetic gain and gap analysis to predict improvements in crop productivity (2020) · cites this paper as Ray, Mueller, West, & Foley, 2013

  • A continuation of current yield trends until 2050 will not suffice to meet the rising global food demand without further growth of cropland areas.

    “A continuation of current yield trends until 2050 will not suffice to meet the rising global food demand without further growth of cropland areas [42].”
  • Yield increases on existing croplands will be an essential component to increased food production, but by themselves will not suffice.

    “Yield increases on existing croplands will be an essential component to increased food production, but by themselves will not suffice (Godfray et al., 2010;Hubert, Rosegrant, van Boekel, & Ortiz, 2010;Ray, Mueller, West, & Foley, 2013).”

    From Mapping the world's degraded lands (2015) · cites this paper as Ray, Mueller, West, & Foley, 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]Fan S, Gulati A, Dalafi S (2007) Synthesis: Lesson and Challenges. In The Dragon and the Elephant, Agricultural and rural reforms in China and India, A. Gulati and S. Fan editors, 465–488, The Jon Hopkins University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ray, D. K., Mueller, N. D., West, P. C., & Foley, J. A.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Ray, Deepak K.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-06-19
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
e66428
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2114891756
Cited by
3,415
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 222 · 2025: 277 · 2024: 313 · 2023: 337 · 2022: 442 · 2021: 397 · 2020: 332 · 2019: 289 · 2018: 230 · 2017: 184 · 2016: 151 · 2015: 129 · 2014: 87 · 2013: 20
FWCI
137.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  • PepsiCo
  • General Mills
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Food Production Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Economics and Practices
Keywords
crop yield trends, global crop production, food demand projections, maize, rice, wheat, soybean, food security, biofuels, land use change, agricultural statistics
MeSH terms
Crop Production, Agriculture, Food Supply, Humans, Population Growth, Crops, Agricultural

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review