The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generation of Targeted Point Mutations in Rice by a Modified CRISPR/Cas9 System
Open accessAbstract
CRISPR/Cas9 (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/CRISPR-associated Cas9 endonuclease)-mediated genome editing has revolutionized biological research and crop improvement because of its specificity, simplicity, and versatility (reviewed in Komor et al., 2016a). Editing a gene by CRISPR/Cas9 only has three requirements: (1) expression of the nuclear localized Cas9 protein; (2) production of a guide RNA (gRNA) molecule, whose first 20 nucleotides are complementary to the target gene; (3) the NGG PAM site that is located immediately adjacent to the 3′ end of the target sequence (Figure 1A).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage
Komor, A. C., Kim, Y. B., Packer, M. S., Zuris, J. A., & Liu, D. R. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17946 · Cited by 5,437
Cited by
Genome editing with CRISPR–Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors
Anzalone, A. V., Koblan, L. W., & Liu, D. R. (2020) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0561-9 · Cited by 2,237
Targeted base editing in rice and tomato using a CRISPR-Cas9 cytidine deaminase fusion
Shimatani, Z., Kashojiya, S., Takayama, M., Terada, R., Arazoe, T., Ishii, H., Teramura, H., Yamamoto, T., Komatsu, H., Miura, K., et al. (2017) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3833 · Cited by 812
Kim, Y. B., Komor, A. C., Levy, J. M., Packer, M. S., Zhao, K. T., & Liu, D. R. (2017) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3803 · Cited by 758
CRISPR for Crop Improvement: An Update Review
Jaganathan, D., Ramasamy, K., Sellamuthu, G., Jayabalan, S., & Venkataraman, G. (2018) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00985 · Cited by 619
EditR: A Method to Quantify Base Editing from Sanger Sequencing
Kluesner, M. G., Nedveck, D. A., Lahr, W. S., Garbe, J. R., Abrahante, J. E., Webber, B. R., & Moriarity, B. S. (2018) · The CRISPR Journal · doi:10.1089/crispr.2018.0014 · Cited by 565
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, J., Sun, Y., Du, J., Zhao, Y., & Xia, L.
- Venue
- Molecular Plant
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 526-529
- ISSN
- 1674-2052 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2560407750
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generation of Targeted Point Mutations in Rice by a Modified CRISPR/Cas9 System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.molp.2016.12.001
- The paper
- Li, J., Sun, Y., Du, J., Zhao, Y., & Xia, L. (2017). Generation of Targeted Point Mutations in Rice by a Modified CRISPR/Cas9 System. Molecular Plant. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2016.12.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
