Cited by 50Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animalsHeavy Metal Exposure and ToxicityTrace Elements in Health

Gut: An underestimated target organ for Aluminum

Vignal, C., Desreumaux, P., Body-Malapel, M.·2016·Morphologie

Abstract

Since World War II, several factors such as an impressive industrial growth, an enhanced environmental bioavailability and intensified food consumption have contributed to a significant amplification of human exposure to aluminum. Aluminum is particularly present in food, beverages, some drugs and airbone dust. In our food, aluminum is superimposed via additives and cooking utensils. Therefore, the tolerable intake of aluminum is exceeded for a significant part of the world population, especially in children who are more vulnerable to toxic effects of pollutants than adults. Faced with this oral aluminum influx, intestinal tract is an essential barrier, especially as 38% of ingested aluminum accumulates at the intestinal mucosa. Although still poorly documented to date, the impact of oral exposure to aluminum in conditions relevant to real human exposure appears to be deleterious for gut homeostasis. Aluminum ingestion affects the regulation of the permeability, the microflora and the immune function of intestine. Nowadays, several arguments are consistent with an involvement of aluminum as an environmental risk factor for inflammatory bowel diseases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.morpho.2016.01.003

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Oral intake of Al may affect the intestinal microbiota, permeability and immune response, which influence local inflammatory conditions.

    “Oral intake of Al may affect the intestinal microbiota, permeability and immune response which influence the local inflammatory conditions (Vignal et al., 2016).”

    From Aluminium toxicosis: a review of toxic actions and effects (2019) · cites this paper as Vignal et al., 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vignal, C., Desreumaux, P., & Body-Malapel, M.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Vignal, C.
Venue
Morphologie
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
100
Issue
329
Pages
75-84
ISSN
  • 0376-6160 (ISSN-L)
  • 1286-0115
OpenAlex
W2296123019
Cited by
50
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Morphologie (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • LillOA (Université de Lille (University Of Lille)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animals
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Trace Elements in Health
Keywords
aluminum, intestine, intestinal mucosa, intestinal permeability, gut microbiota, intestinal immunity, inflammatory bowel disease, aluminum additive, tolerable intake, children, intestinal homeostasis, environmental exposure, food contamination, cooking utensils, airborne dust, air pollution, industrial pollution, intestinal inflammation
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Adult, Animals, Beverages, Biological Availability, Child, Cooking and Eating Utensils, Crohn Disease, Dust, Eating, Environmental Exposure, Environmental Pollutants, Food, Homeostasis, Horses, Humans, Intestinal Mucosa, Risk Factors, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Incidence, Aluminum Compounds, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review