Cited by 4Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Assessment of complementary white matter microstructural changes and grey matter atrophy in a preclinical model of Alzheimer’s disease

Bergamino, Maurizio, Nelson, Megan R., Numani, Asfia, Scarpelli, Matthew, Healey, Deborah, Fuentes, Alberto, Turner, Gregory, Stokes, Ashley M.·2023·Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been associated with amyloid and tau pathology, as well as neurodegeneration. Beyond these hallmark features, white matter microstructural abnormalities have been observed using MRI. The objective of this study was to assess grey matter atrophy and white matter microstructural changes in a preclinical mouse model of AD (3xTg-AD) using voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and free-water (FW) diffusion tensor imaging (FW-DTI). Compared to controls, lower grey matter density was observed in the 3xTg-AD model, corresponding to the small clusters in the caudate-putamen, hypothalamus, and cortex. DTI-based fractional anisotropy (FA) was decreased in the 3xTg model, while the FW index was increased. Notably, the largest clusters for both FW-FA and FW index were in the fimbria, with other regions including the anterior commissure, corpus callosum, forebrain septum, and internal capsule. Additionally, the presence of amyloid and tau in the 3xTg model was confirmed with histopathology, with significantly higher levels observed across many regions of the brain. Taken together, these results are consistent with subtle neurodegenerative and white matter microstructural changes in the 3xTg-AD model that manifest as increased FW, decreased FW-FA, and decreased grey matter density.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mri.2023.03.024

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bergamino, M., Nelson, M. R., Numani, A., Scarpelli, M., Healey, D., Fuentes, A., Turner, G., & Stokes, A. M.
Affiliations
Barrow Neurological Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Stokes, Ashley M.
Venue
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-09
Volume
101
Pages
57-66
ISSN
0730-725X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4362672585
Cited by
4
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Arizona Alzheimer’s Consortium
  • Barrow Neurological Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, 3xTg-AD mice, white matter microstructure, gray matter atrophy, fractional anisotropy, amyloid pathology, tau pathology, neurodegeneration, fimbria, caudate-putamen, hypothalamus, voxel-based morphometry
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Atrophy, Brain, Mice, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, White Matter, Gray Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review