Cited by 170Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation

Melt electrospinning of poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds: Phenomenological observations associated with collection and direct writing

Brown, Toby D., Edin, Fredrik, Detta, Nicola, Skelton, Anthony D., Hutmacher, Dietmar W., Dalton, Paul D.·2014·Materials Science and Engineering: C

Abstract

Melt electrospinning and its additive manufacturing analogue, melt electrospinning writing (MEW), are two processes which can produce porous materials for applications where solvent toxicity and accumulation in solution electrospinning are problematic. This study explores the melt electrospinning of poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) scaffolds, specifically for applications in tissue engineering. The research described here aims to inform researchers interested in melt electrospinning about technical aspects of the process. This includes rapid fiber characterization using glass microscope slides, allowing influential processing parameters on fiber morphology to be assessed, as well as observed fiber collection phenomena on different collector substrates. The distribution and alignment of melt electrospun PCL fibers can be controlled to a certain degree using patterned collectors to create large numbers of scaffolds with shaped macroporous architectures. However, the buildup of residual charge in the collected fibers limits the achievable thickness of the porous template through such scaffolds. One challenge identified for MEW is the ability to control charge buildup so that fibers can be placed accurately in close proximity, and in many centimeter heights. The scale and size of scaffolds produced using MEW, however, indicate that this emerging process will fill a technological niche in biofabrication.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.msec.2014.07.034

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, T. D., Edin, F., Detta, N., Skelton, A. D., Hutmacher, D. W., & Dalton, P. D.
Affiliations
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
  • Hutmacher, Dietmar W.
  • Dalton, Paul D.
Venue
Materials Science and Engineering: C
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
45
Pages
698-708
ISSN
0928-4931 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116489560
Cited by
170
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Materials Science and Engineering C (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
Keywords
melt electrospinning, polycaprolactone, fiber scaffolds, tissue engineering scaffolds, fiber alignment, fiber morphology, biofabrication
MeSH terms
Biocompatible Materials, Humans, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Polyesters, Writing, Tissue Engineering, Tissue Scaffolds, Hydrodynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review