3D printing of silk microparticle reinforced polycaprolactone scaffolds for tissue engineering applications.
Open accessAbstract
Polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds have been widely investigated for tissue engineering applications, however, they exhibit poor cell adhesion and mechanical properties. Subsequently, PCL composites have been produced to improve the material properties. This study utilises a natural material, Bombyx mori silk microparticles (SMP) prepared by milling silk fibre, to produce a composite to enhance the scaffolds properties. Silk is biocompatible and biodegradable with excellent mechanical properties. However, there are no studies using SMPs as a reinforcing agent in a 3D printed thermoplastic polymer scaffold. PCL/SMP (10, 20, 30 wt%) composites were prepared by melt blending. Rheological analysis showed that SMP loading increased the shear thinning and storage modulus of the material. Scaffolds were fabricated using a screw-assisted extrusion-based additive manufacturing system. Scanning electron microscopy and X-ray microtomography was used to determine scaffold morphology. The scaffolds had high interconnectivity with regular printed fibres and pore morphologies within the designed parameters. Compressive mechanical testing showed that the addition of SMP significantly improved the compressive Young's modulus of the scaffolds. The scaffolds were more hydrophobic with the inclusion of SMP which was linked to a decrease in total protein adsorption. Cell behaviour was assessed using human adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells. A cytotoxic effect was observed at higher particle loading (30 wt%) after 7 days of culture. By day 21, 10 wt% loading showed significantly higher cell metabolic activity and proliferation, high cell viability, and cell migration throughout the scaffold. Calcium mineral deposition was observed on the scaffolds during cell culture. Large calcium mineral deposits were observed at 30 wt% and smaller calcium deposits were observed at 10 wt%. This study demonstrates that SMPs incorporated into a PCL scaffold provided effective mechanical reinforcement, improved the rate of degradation, and increased cell proliferation, demonstrating potential suitability for bone tissue engineering applications.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Poor wettability of PCL has a direct influence on cell attachment and proliferation, resulting in limitations in healthcare and medical applications.
“The poor wettability also has a direct influence on the cell attachment and proliferation resulting in certain limitations in healthcare and medical applications [32][33][34]”
From A strategy to tailor the mechanical and degradation properties of PCL-PEG-PCL based copolymers for biomedical application (2023) · cites this paper as [32]
Cites
Exploring and Engineering the Cell Surface Interface
Stevens, M. M., & George, J. H. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1106587 · Cited by 2,607 · see citing works
Biomechanics of cellular solids
Gibson, L. J. (2005) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.09.027 · Cited by 961 · see citing works
Effects of surface wettability and contact time on protein adhesion to biomaterial surfaces
Xu, L.-C., & Siedlecki, C. A. (2007) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.03.032 · Cited by 715 · see citing works
Lam, C. X. F., Savalani, M. M., Teoh, S.-H., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2008) · Biomedical Materials · doi:10.1088/1748-6041/3/3/034108 · Cited by 444 · see citing works
High-strength silk protein scaffolds for bone repair
Mandal, B. B., Grinberg, A., Seok Gil, E., Panilaitis, B., & Kaplan, D. L. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1119474109 · Cited by 401 · see citing works
Huang, M.-H., Li, S., & Vert, M. (2004) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2004.10.054 · Cited by 222 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The degradation rate of pure PCL is slow (up to several years in vivo) compared to other biopolymers, which can cause issues depending on the specific tissue engineering application requirements [12,105,106].”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
3D printing to innovate biopolymer materials for demanding applications: A review
Li, N., Qiao, D., Zhao, S., Lin, Q., Zhang, B., & Xie, F. (2021) · Materials Today Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.mtchem.2021.100459 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Advances in guided bone regeneration membranes: a comprehensive review of materials and techniques
Ali, M., Mohd Noor, S. N. F., Mohamad, H., Ullah, F., Javed, F., & Abdul Hamid, Z. A. (2024) · Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express · doi:10.1088/2057-1976/ad1e75 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Liu, Y.-Y., Blázquez, J. P. F., Yin, G.-Z., Wang, D.-Y., Llorca, J., & Echeverry-Rendón, M. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.15503 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
- Authors
- Vyas, C., Zhang, J., Øvrebø, Ø., Huang, B., Roberts, I., Setty, M., Allardyce, B., Haugen, H., Rajkhowa, R., & Bartolo, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Deakin University (AU)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Vyas, Cian
- ORCID
- Venue
- Materials Science and Engineering: C
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 118
- Pages
- 111433
- ISSN
- 0928-4931 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3081298881
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 4.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Materials Science and Engineering C (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Medical Research Council
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
- Keywords
- polycaprolactone scaffolds, Bombyx mori silk, polymer composites, 3D printing, mechanical reinforcement, compressive modulus, hydrophobicity, protein adsorption, adipose-derived stem cells, cell proliferation, cell migration, bone tissue engineering, biodegradation, rheology
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Polyesters, Porosity, Tissue Engineering, Silk, Tissue Scaffolds, Printing, Three-Dimensional
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review