CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 533D Printing in Biomedical ResearchTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Recent advances in 3D bioprinted cartilage-mimicking constructs for applications in tissue engineering

Open access
Zhou, Jian, Li, Qi, Tian, Zhuang, Yao, Qi, Zhang, Mingzhu·2023·Materials Today Bio
DOI 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100870PMC PMC10765242
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Human cartilage tissue can be categorized into three types: hyaline cartilage, elastic cartilage and fibrocartilage. Each type of cartilage tissue possesses unique properties and functions, which presents a significant challenge for the regeneration and repair of damaged tissue. Bionics is a discipline in which humans study and imitate nature. A bionic strategy based on comprehensive knowledge of the anatomy and histology of human cartilage is expected to contribute to fundamental study of core elements of tissue repair. Moreover, as a novel tissue-engineered technology, 3D bioprinting has the distinctive advantage of the rapid and precise construction of targeted models. Thus, by selecting suitable materials, cells and cytokines, and by leveraging advanced printing technology and bionic concepts, it becomes possible to simultaneously realize multiple beneficial properties and achieve improved tissue repair. This article provides an overview of key elements involved in the combination of 3D bioprinting and bionic strategies, with a particular focus on recent advances in mimicking different types of cartilage tissue.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100870

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 200

  1. Wang, 2021, Ear reconstruction with the combination of expanded skin flap and medpor framework: 20 Years of experience in a single center, Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 148, 850, 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008325 · DOI
  2. Nakamura, 2009, In situ tissue engineering for tracheal reconstruction using a luminar remodeling type of artificial trachea, J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 138, 811, 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.07.072 · DOI
  3. Li, 2023, Exploring the mechanism of microfracture in the treatment of porcine full-thickness cartilage defect, Am. J. Sports Med., 51, 1033, 10.1177/03635465231153630 · DOI
  4. Dang, 2023, Effect of bone morphogenetic protein-2 combined with microfracture for osteochondral defect of the talus in a rabbit model, Am. J. Sports Med., 10.1177/03635465231162316 · DOI
  5. Snow, 2023, A randomized trial of autologous chondrocyte implantation versus alternative forms of surgical cartilage management in patients with a failed primary treatment for chondral or osteochondral defects in the knee, Am. J. Sports Med., 51, 367, 10.1177/03635465221141907 · DOI
  6. Pareek, 2016, Osteochondral autograft transfer versus microfracture in the knee: a meta-analysis of prospective comparative studies at midterm, Arthroscopy, 32, 2118, 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.05.038 · DOI
  7. Ma, 2023, Magnetic microcarriers with accurate localization and proliferation of mesenchymal stem cell for cartilage defects repairing, ACS Nano., 17, 6373, 10.1021/acsnano.2c10995 · DOI
  8. Daou, 2021, Current advances in the regeneration of degenerated articular cartilage: a literature review on tissue engineering and its recent clinical translation, Materials, 15, 31, 10.3390/ma15010031 · DOI
  9. Samie, 2023, Drug/bioactive eluting chitosan composite foams for osteochondral tissue engineering, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 229, 561, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.12.293 · DOI
  10. Guastaferro, 2021, Production of porous agarose-based structures: freeze-drying vs. Supercritical CO2 drying, Gels, 7, 198, 10.3390/gels7040198 · DOI
  11. Klimek, 2022, Freeze-dried curdlan/whey protein isolate-based biomaterial as promising scaffold for matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation-A pilot in-vitro study, Cells, 11, 282, 10.3390/cells11020282 · DOI
  12. Han, 2022, Multifunctional nanofibrous scaffolds with angle-ply microstructure and Co-delivery capacity promote partial repair and total replacement of intervertebral disc, Adv. Healthcare Mater., 11
  13. Han, 2022, Multifunctional nanofibrous scaffolds with angle-ply microstructure and Co-delivery capacity promote partial repair and total replacement of intervertebral disc, Adv. Healthcare Mater., 11
  14. Ghadirian, 2023, Evaluation of the effects of halloysite nanotube on polyhydroxybutyrate - chitosan electrospun scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering applications, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 233, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123651 · DOI
  15. Li, 2023, Living and injectable porous hydrogel microsphere with paracrine activity for cartilage regeneration, Small
  16. Yao, 2023, Visualizable and lubricating hydrogel microspheres via NanoPOSS for cartilage regeneration, Adv. Sci., 10.1002/advs.202207438 · DOI
  17. Qu, 2023, Photocrosslinkable, injectable locust bean gum hydrogel induces chondrogenic differentiation of stem cells for cartilage regeneration, Adv. Healthcare Mater., 10.1002/adhm.202203079 · DOI
  18. Wang, 2022, Intraarticularly injectable silk hydrogel microspheres with enhanced mechanical and structural stability to attenuate osteoarthritis, Biomaterials, 286, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121611 · DOI
  19. Chen, 2023, Injectable nanofiber microspheres modified with metal phenolic networks for effective osteoarthritis treatment, Acta Biomater., 157, 593, 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.11.040 · DOI
  20. Xu, 2019, Biomaterials for stem cell engineering and biomanufacturing, Bioact. Mater., 4, 366
  21. Eyre, 1995, Collagen structure and cartilage matrix integrity, J. Rheumatol. Suppl., 43, 82
  22. Mameri, 2022, Review of meniscus anatomy and biomechanics, Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med, 15, 323, 10.1007/s12178-022-09768-1 · DOI
  23. Brindle, 2001, The meniscus: review of basic principles with application to surgery and rehabilitation, J. Athl. Train., 36, 160
  24. Martyniak, 2022, Biomaterial composition and stiffness as decisive properties of 3D bioprinted constructs for type II collagen stimulation, Acta Biomater., 152, 221, 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.08.058 · DOI
  25. Chen, 2019, PCL-MECM-Based hydrogel hybrid scaffolds and meniscal fibrochondrocytes promote whole meniscus regeneration in a rabbit meniscectomy model, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 11, 41626, 10.1021/acsami.9b13611 · DOI
  26. Vahdati, 2013, Implant size and mechanical properties influence the failure of the adhesive bond between cartilage implants and native tissue in a finite element analysis, J. Biomech., 46, 1554, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.03.019 · DOI
  27. Stocco, 2022, Meniscus regeneration by 3D printing technologies: current advances and future perspectives, J. Tissue Eng., 13, 10.1177/20417314211065860 · DOI
  28. Tan, 2011, Interactions of meniscal cells with extracellular matrix molecules: towards the generation of tissue engineered menisci, Cell Adhes. Migrat., 5, 220, 10.4161/cam.5.3.14463 · DOI
  29. Krupkova, 2018, The pathobiology of the meniscus: a comparison between the human and dog, Front. Vet. Sci., 5, 73, 10.3389/fvets.2018.00073 · DOI
  30. Bahcecioglu, 2019, Anatomical meniscus construct with zone specific biochemical composition and structural organization, Biomaterials, 218, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119361 · DOI
  31. Guo, 2021, 3D-printed cell-free PCL-MECM scaffold with biomimetic micro-structure and micro-environment to enhance in situ meniscus regeneration, Bioact. Mater., 6, 3620
  32. Lee, 2019, Resolution and shape in bioprinting: strategizing towards complex tissue and organ printing, Appl. Phys. Rev., 6, 10.1063/1.5053909 · DOI
  33. Lee, 2016, Design and printing strategies in 3D bioprinting of cell-hydrogels: a review, Adv. Healthcare Mater., 5, 2856, 10.1002/adhm.201600435 · DOI
  34. Makris, 2011, The knee meniscus: structure-function, pathophysiology, current repair techniques, and prospects for regeneration, Biomaterials, 32, 7411, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.037 · DOI
  35. Kurosawa, 1980, Load-bearing mode of the knee joint: physical behavior of the knee joint with or without menisci, Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 149, 283, 10.1097/00003086-198006000-00039 · DOI
  36. Athanasiou, 1994, Comparative study of the intrinsic mechanical properties of the human acetabular and femoral head cartilage, J. Orthop. Res., 12, 340, 10.1002/jor.1100120306 · DOI
  37. Taheri, 2023, Progress in biomechanical stimuli on the cell-encapsulated hydrogels for cartilage tissue regeneration, Biomater. Res., 27, 22, 10.1186/s40824-023-00358-x · DOI
  38. Stager, 2022, Polyelectrolyte complex hydrogels with controlled mechanics affect mesenchymal stem cell differentiation relevant to growth plate injuries, Macromol. Biosci., 22, 10.1002/mabi.202200126 · DOI
  39. Chen, 2023, 3D-biofabricated chondrocyte-laden decellularized extracellular matrix-contained gelatin methacrylate auxetic scaffolds under cyclic tensile stimulation for cartilage regeneration, Biofabrication, 15, 10.1088/1758-5090/ace5e1 · DOI
  40. Zhou, 2019, 3D Printed scaffolds with hierarchical biomimetic structure for osteochondral regeneration, Nanomedicine, 19, 58, 10.1016/j.nano.2019.04.002 · DOI
  41. Park, 2021, 3D bioprinting of a trachea-mimetic cellular construct of a clinically relevant size, Biomaterials, 279, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121246 · DOI
  42. Zhang, 2009, The role of tissue engineering in articular cartilage repair and regeneration, Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 37, 1, 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v37.i1-2.10 · DOI
  43. Machino, 2019, Replacement of rat tracheas by layered, trachea-like, scaffold-free structures of human cells using a bio-3D printing system, Adv. Healthcare Mater., 8, 10.1002/adhm.201800983 · DOI
  44. Zhang, 2020, Cell-free biomimetic scaffold with cartilage extracellular matrix-like architectures for in situ inductive regeneration of osteochondral defects, ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng., 6, 6917, 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01276 · DOI
  45. Haghiashtiani, 2020, 3D printed patient-specific aortic root models with internal sensors for minimally invasive applications, Sci. Adv., 6, 10.1126/sciadv.abb4641 · DOI
  46. Grigoryan, 2019, Multivascular networks and functional intravascular topologies within biocompatible hydrogels, Science, 364, 458, 10.1126/science.aav9750 · DOI
  47. Yang, 2023, Minimally invasive bioprinting for in situ liver regeneration, Bioact. Mater., 26, 465
  48. Lee, 2023, 3D bioprinting using a new photo-crosslinking method for muscle tissue restoration, NPJ Regen Med, 8, 18, 10.1038/s41536-023-00292-5 · DOI
  49. Yang, 2023, 3D bio-printed living nerve-like fibers refine the ecological niche for long-distance spinal cord injury regeneration, Bioact. Mater., 25, 160
  50. Xie, 2023, Application of hydrogels as three-dimensional bioprinting ink for tissue engineering, Gels, 9, 88, 10.3390/gels9020088 · DOI
  51. Johnson, 2015, 3D printed anatomical nerve regeneration pathways, Adv. Funct. Mater., 25, 6205, 10.1002/adfm.201501760 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Lee, 2019, 3D bioprinting of collagen to rebuild components of the human heart, Science, 365, 482, 10.1126/science.aav9051 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Kim, 2020, Creation of bladder assembloids mimicking tissue regeneration and cancer, Nature, 588, 664, 10.1038/s41586-020-3034-x · DOI
  54. Kim, 2020, Neural cell integration into 3D bioprinted skeletal muscle constructs accelerates restoration of muscle function, Nat. Commun., 11, 1025, 10.1038/s41467-020-14930-9 · DOI
  55. Zhang, 2020, 3D printing of Haversian bone-mimicking scaffolds for multicellular delivery in bone regeneration, Sci. Adv., 6, eaaz6725, 10.1126/sciadv.aaz6725 · DOI
  56. Qiu, 2023, 3D biomimetic calcified cartilaginous callus that induces type H vessels formation and osteoclastogenesis, Adv. Sci.
  57. Lawlor, 2021, Cellular extrusion bioprinting improves kidney organoid reproducibility and conformation, Nat. Mater., 20, 260, 10.1038/s41563-020-00853-9 · DOI
  58. Jian, 2020, 3D bioprinting of a biomimetic meniscal scaffold for application in tissue engineering, Bioact. Mater., 6, 1711
  59. Sakai, 2020, Silk fibroin nanofibers: a promising ink additive for extrusion three-dimensional bioprinting, Mater Today Bio, 8
  60. Wang, 2016, Stereolithographic (SLA) 3D printing of oral modified-release dosage forms, Int. J. Pharm., 503, 207, 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.03.016 · DOI
  61. Li, 2023, Stereolithography apparatus and digital light processing-based 3D bioprinting for tissue fabrication, iScience, 26, 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106039 · DOI
  62. Quan, 2020, Photo-curing 3D printing technique and its challenges, Bioact. Mater., 5, 110
  63. Schoonraad, 2021, Biomimetic and mechanically supportive 3D printed scaffolds for cartilage and osteochondral tissue engineering using photopolymers and digital light processing, Biofabrication, 13, 10.1088/1758-5090/ac23ab · DOI
  64. Li, 2020, Inkjet bioprinting of biomaterials, Chem. Rev., 120, 10793, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00008 · DOI
  65. Xu, 2013, Hybrid printing of mechanically and biologically improved constructs for cartilage tissue engineering applications, Biofabrication, 5, 10.1088/1758-5082/5/1/015001 · DOI
  66. Barceló, 2023, Bioprinting of structurally organized meniscal tissue within anisotropic melt electrowritten scaffolds, Acta Biomater., 158, 216, 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.12.047 · DOI
  67. Yang, 2019, 4D bioprinting: technological advances in biofabrication, Macromol. Biosci., 19, 10.1002/mabi.201800441 · DOI
  68. Boley, 2019, Shape-shifting structured lattices via multimaterial 4D printing, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 116, 20856, 10.1073/pnas.1908806116 · DOI
  69. Apsite, 2017, Porous stimuli-responsive self-folding electrospun mats for 4D biofabrication, Biomacromolecules, 18, 3178, 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b00829 · DOI
  70. Nadgorny, 2018, Functional polymers and nanocomposites for 3D printing of smart structures and devices, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 10, 17489, 10.1021/acsami.8b01786 · DOI
  71. Lui, 2019, 4D printing and stimuli-responsive materials in biomedical aspects, Acta Biomater., 92, 19, 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.005 · DOI
  72. Devillard, 2018, Bioinspired multi-activities 4D printing objects: a new approach toward complex tissue engineering, Biotechnol. J., 13, 10.1002/biot.201800098 · DOI
  73. Betsch, 2018, Incorporating 4D into bioprinting: real-time magnetically directed collagen fiber alignment for generating complex multilayered tissues, Adv. Healthcare Mater., 7, 10.1002/adhm.201800894 · DOI
  74. Huebsch, 2014, Ultrasound-triggered disruption and self-healing of reversibly cross-linked hydrogels for drug delivery and enhanced chemotherapy, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 111, 9762, 10.1073/pnas.1405469111 · DOI
  75. Luo, 2019, Cell-laden four-dimensional bioprinting using near-infrared-triggered shape-morphing alginate/polydopamine bioinks, Biofabrication, 11, 10.1088/1758-5090/ab39c5 · DOI
  76. Gugulothu, 2023, Visible light-based 4D-bioprinted tissue scaffold, ACS Macro Lett., 494, 10.1021/acsmacrolett.3c00036 · DOI
  77. Yang, 2021, A skeleton muscle model using GelMA-based cell-aligned bioink processed with an electric-field assisted 3D/4D bioprinting, Theranostics, 11, 48, 10.7150/thno.50794 · DOI
  78. Clegg, 2019, Modular fabrication of intelligent material-tissue interfaces for bioinspired and biomimetic devices, Prog. Mater. Sci., 106, 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100589 · DOI
  79. Díaz-Payno, 2023, Swelling-dependent shape-based transformation of a human mesenchymal stromal cells-laden 4D bioprinted construct for cartilage tissue engineering, Adv. Healthcare Mater., 12, 10.1002/adhm.202201891 · DOI
  80. Kim, 2020, 4D-bioprinted silk hydrogels for tissue engineering, Biomaterials, 260, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120281 · DOI
  81. Ding, 2022, Jammed micro-flake hydrogel for four-dimensional living cell bioprinting, Adv. Mater., 34
  82. Chakraborty, 2023, Development of a biomimetic arch-like 3D bioprinted construct for cartilage regeneration using gelatin methacryloyl and silk fibroin-gelatin bioinks, Biofabrication, 15, 10.1088/1758-5090/acc68f · DOI
  83. Zeng, 2022, Bacterial nanocellulose-reinforced gelatin methacryloyl hydrogel enhances biomechanical property and glycosaminoglycan content of 3D-bioprinted cartilage, Int J Bioprint, 9, 631, 10.18063/ijb.v9i1.631 · DOI
  84. Flégeau, 2022, Cartilage tissue engineering by extrusion bioprinting utilizing porous hyaluronic acid microgel bioinks, Biofabrication, 14, 10.1088/1758-5090/ac6b58 · DOI
  85. Hauptstein, 2022, Tethered TGF-β1 in a hyaluronic acid-based bioink for bioprinting cartilaginous tissues, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 23, 924, 10.3390/ijms23020924 · DOI
  86. Decarli, 2023, Bioprinting of stem cell spheroids followed by post-printing chondrogenic differentiation for cartilage tissue engineering, Adv. Healthcare Mater.
  87. Chen, 2022, Hybridizing gellan/alginate and thixotropic magnesium phosphate-based hydrogel scaffolds for enhanced osteochondral repair, Mater Today Bio, 14
  88. Decarli, 2023, Bioprinting of stem cell spheroids followed by post-printing chondrogenic differentiation for cartilage tissue engineering, Adv. Healthcare Mater.
  89. Hong, 2020, Digital light processing 3D printed silk fibroin hydrogel for cartilage tissue engineering, Biomaterials, 232, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119679 · DOI
  90. Singh, 2019, 3D bioprinting using cross-linker-free silk-gelatin bioink for cartilage tissue engineering, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 11, 33684, 10.1021/acsami.9b11644 · DOI
  91. Serrano-Aroca, 2022, Scaffolds in the microbial resistant era: fabrication, materials, properties and tissue engineering applications, Mater Today Bio, 16
  92. Zhang, 2021, Crosslinker-free silk/decellularized extracellular matrix porous bioink for 3D bioprinting-based cartilage tissue engineering, Mater. Sci. Eng., C, 118, 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111388 · DOI
  93. Huang, 2022, A naringin-derived bioink enhances the shape fidelity of 3D bioprinting and efficiency of cartilage defect repair, J. Mater. Chem. B, 10, 7030, 10.1039/D2TB01247B · DOI
  94. Kim, 2019, Three-dimensional bioprinting of cell-laden constructs using polysaccharide-based self-healing hydrogels, Biomacromolecules, 20, 1860, 10.1021/acs.biomac.8b01589 · DOI
  95. Ge, 2021, Effects of mechanical compression on chondrogenesis of human synovium-derived mesenchymal stem cells in agarose hydrogel, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 9, 10.3389/fbioe.2021.697281 · DOI
  96. Li, 2022, Application and development of 3D bioprinting in cartilage tissue engineering, Biomater. Sci., 10, 5430, 10.1039/D2BM00709F · DOI
  97. Sang, 2023, 3D bioprinting using synovium-derived MSC-laden photo-cross-linked ECM bioink for cartilage regeneration, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 15, 8895, 10.1021/acsami.2c19058 · DOI
  98. Terzopoulou, 2022, Biocompatible synthetic polymers for tissue engineering purposes, Biomacromolecules, 23, 1841, 10.1021/acs.biomac.2c00047 · DOI
  99. Zhang, 2017, 3D-Printed poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffold augmented with mesenchymal stem cells for total meniscal substitution: a 12- and 24-week animal study in a rabbit model, Am. J. Sports Med., 45, 1497, 10.1177/0363546517691513 · DOI
  100. Zhang, 2016, Role of scaffold mean pore size in meniscus regeneration, Acta Biomater., 43, 314, 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.07.050 · DOI
  101. Abpeikar, 2021, Macroporous scaffold surface modified with biological macromolecules and piroxicam-loaded gelatin nanofibers toward meniscus cartilage repair, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 183, 1327, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.04.151 · DOI
  102. Abpeikar, 2022, Development of meniscus cartilage using polycaprolactone and decellularized meniscus surface modified by gelatin, hyaluronic acid biomacromolecules: a rabbit model, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 213, 498, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.05.140 · DOI
  103. Gupta, 2020, Meniscal tissue engineering via 3D printed PLA monolith with carbohydrate based self-healing interpenetrating network hydrogel, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 162, 1358, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.238 · DOI
  104. Lan, 2023, 3D bioprinting of hyaline cartilage using nasal chondrocytes, Ann. Biomed. Eng.
  105. Ren, 2016, Engineering zonal cartilage through bioprinting collagen type II hydrogel constructs with biomimetic chondrocyte density gradient, BMC Muscoskel. Disord., 17, 301, 10.1186/s12891-016-1130-8 · DOI
  106. Rhee, 2016, 3D bioprinting of spatially heterogeneous collagen constructs for cartilage tissue engineering, ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng., 2, 1800, 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00288 · DOI
  107. Luo, 2019, 3D bioprinting of hydrogel-based biomimetic microenvironments, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater., 107, 1695, 10.1002/jbm.b.34262 · DOI
  108. Lan, 2021, TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofiber-alginate hydrogel as a bioink for human meniscus tissue engineering, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 9, 10.3389/fbioe.2021.766399 · DOI
  109. Dong, 2021, Three-dimensional-printed external scaffolds mitigate loss of volume and topography in engineered elastic cartilage constructs, Cartilage, 13, 1780S, 10.1177/19476035211049556 · DOI
  110. Xie, 2022, Microtissue-based bioink as a chondrocyte microshelter for DLP bioprinting, Adv. Healthcare Mater., 11
  111. Zheng, 2023, A comparative study on various cell sources for constructing tissue-engineered meniscus, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 11, 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1128762 · DOI
  112. Zhang, 2023, Cartilage 3D bioprinting for rhinoplasty using adipose-derived stem cells as seed cells: review and recent advances, Cell Prolif., 56, 10.1111/cpr.13417 · DOI
  113. Liu, 2021, 3D-bioprinted BMSC-laden biomimetic multiphasic scaffolds for efficient repair of osteochondral defects in an osteoarthritic rat model, Biomaterials, 279, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121216 · DOI
  114. von der Mark, 1977, Relationship between cell shape and type of collagen synthesised as chondrocytes lose their cartilage phenotype in culture, Nature, 267, 531, 10.1038/267531a0 · DOI
  115. Cournil-Henrionnet, 2008, Phenotypic analysis of cell surface markers and gene expression of human mesenchymal stem cells and chondrocytes during monolayer expansion, Biorheology, 45, 513
  116. Friedenstein, 1970, The development of fibroblast colonies in monolayer cultures of Guinea-pig bone marrow and spleen cells, Cell Tissue Kinet., 3, 393
  117. De Bari, 2001, Multipotent mesenchymal stem cells from adult human synovial membrane, Arthritis Rheum., 44, 1928, 10.1002/1529-0131(200108)44:8<1928::AID-ART331>3.0.CO;2-P · DOI
  118. Jones, 2004, Enumeration and phenotypic characterization of synovial fluid multipotential mesenchymal progenitor cells in inflammatory and degenerative arthritis, Arthritis Rheum., 50, 817, 10.1002/art.20203 · DOI
  119. Gronthos, 2000, Postnatal human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) in vitro and in vivo, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 97, 13625, 10.1073/pnas.240309797 · DOI
  120. Erices, 2000, Mesenchymal progenitor cells in human umbilical cord blood, Br. J. Haematol., 109, 235, 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2000.01986.x · DOI
  121. Pelttari, 2006, Premature induction of hypertrophy during in vitro chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells correlates with calcification and vascular invasion after ectopic transplantation in SCID mice, Arthritis Rheum., 54, 3254, 10.1002/art.22136 · DOI
  122. Zhang, 2020, Optimization of mechanical stiffness and cell density of 3D bioprinted cell-laden scaffolds improves extracellular matrix mineralization and cellular organization for bone tissue engineering, Acta Biomater., 114, 307, 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.07.016 · DOI
  123. Messaoudi, 2020, Stem cells and extrusion 3D printing for hyaline cartilage engineering, Cells, 10, 2, 10.3390/cells10010002 · DOI
  124. Basal, 2022, Effect of polycaprolactone scaffolds containing different weights of graphene on healing in large osteochondral defect model, J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed., 33, 1123, 10.1080/09205063.2022.2042035 · DOI
  125. Kilian, 2022, Core-shell bioprinting as a strategy to apply differentiation factors in a spatially defined manner inside osteochondral tissue substitutes, Biofabrication, 14
  126. Yang, 2022, Microenvironmentally optimized 3D-printed TGFβ-functionalized scaffolds facilitate endogenous cartilage regeneration in sheep, Acta Biomater., 150, 181, 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.07.029 · DOI
  127. Wang, 2021, Affinity-bound growth factor within sulfated interpenetrating network bioinks for bioprinting cartilaginous tissues, Acta Biomater., 128, 130, 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.04.016 · DOI
  128. Jose, 2020, Fabrication and functionalization of 3D-printed soft and hard scaffolds with growth factors for enhanced bioactivity, RSC Adv., 10, 37928, 10.1039/D0RA08295C · DOI
  129. Gurkan, 2014, Engineering anisotropic biomimetic fibrocartilage microenvironment by bioprinting mesenchymal stem cells in nanoliter gel droplets, Mol. Pharm., 11, 2151, 10.1021/mp400573g · DOI
  130. Daly, 2018, 3D printed microchannel networks to direct vascularisation during endochondral bone repair, Biomaterials, 162, 34, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.01.057 · DOI
  131. Mayoral, 2022, Tissue engineered in-vitro vascular patch fabrication using hybrid 3D printing and electrospinning, Mater Today Bio, 14
  132. Wei, 2020, IGF-1-releasing PLGA nanoparticles modified 3D printed PCL scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering, Drug Deliv., 27, 1106, 10.1080/10717544.2020.1797239 · DOI
  133. Beudert, 2022, Merging bioresponsive release of insulin-like growth factor I with 3D printable thermogelling hydrogels, J. Contr. Release, 347, 115, 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.04.028 · DOI
  134. Endo, 2023, Aerobic exercise and scaffolds with hierarchical porosity synergistically promote functional recovery post volumetric muscle loss, Biomaterials, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.122058 · DOI
  135. Mameri, 2022, Review of meniscus anatomy and biomechanics, Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med, 15, 323, 10.1007/s12178-022-09768-1 · DOI
  136. Amiri, 2022, Fabrication and assessment of a novel hybrid scaffold consisted of polyurethane-gellan gum-hyaluronic acid-glucosamine for meniscus tissue engineering, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 203, 610, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.01.091 · DOI
  137. Costa, 2020, 3D bioprinted highly elastic hybrid constructs for advanced fibrocartilaginous tissue regeneration, Chem. Mater., 32, 8733, 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c03556 · DOI
  138. Lu, 2022, The design and characterization of a strong bio-ink for meniscus regeneration, Int J Bioprint, 8, 600, 10.18063/ijb.v8i4.600 · DOI
  139. Chen, 2019, PCL-MECM-Based hydrogel hybrid scaffolds and meniscal fibrochondrocytes promote whole meniscus regeneration in a rabbit meniscectomy model, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 11, 41626, 10.1021/acsami.9b13611 · DOI
  140. Li, 2020, Biomechanically, structurally and functionally meticulously tailored polycaprolactone/silk fibroin scaffold for meniscus regeneration, Theranostics, 10, 5090, 10.7150/thno.44270 · DOI
  141. Li, 2021, 3D printed poly(ε-caprolactone)/meniscus extracellular matrix composite scaffold functionalized with kartogenin-releasing PLGA microspheres for meniscus tissue engineering, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 9
  142. Hao, 2021, Biofabrication of cell-free dual drug-releasing biomimetic scaffolds for meniscal regeneration, Biofabrication, 14
  143. Xu, 2022, Protein-spatiotemporal partition releasing gradient porous scaffolds and anti-inflammatory and antioxidant regulation remodel tissue engineered anisotropic meniscus, Bioact. Mater., 20, 194
  144. Sun, 2021, 3D-bioprinting ready-to-implant anisotropic menisci recapitulate healthy meniscus phenotype and prevent secondary joint degeneration, Theranostics, 11, 5160, 10.7150/thno.54864 · DOI
  145. Chae, 2021, 3D cell-printing of biocompatible and functional meniscus constructs using meniscus-derived bioink, Biomaterials, 267, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120466 · DOI
  146. Cengiz, 2020, Entrapped in cage (EiC) scaffolds of 3D-printed polycaprolactone and porous silk fibroin for meniscus tissue engineering, Biofabrication, 12, 10.1088/1758-5090/ab779f · DOI
  147. Hunziker, 2002, Quantitative structural organization of normal adult human articular cartilage, Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 10, 564, 10.1053/joca.2002.0814 · DOI
  148. Ding, 2022, Microcarriers in application for cartilage tissue engineering: recent progress and challenges, Bioact. Mater., 17, 81
  149. Yang, 2018, Collagen-alginate as bioink for three-dimensional (3D) cell printing based cartilage tissue engineering, Mater. Sci. Eng., C, 83, 195, 10.1016/j.msec.2017.09.002 · DOI
  150. Li, 2021, Chitosan hydrogel/3D-printed poly(ε-caprolactone) hybrid scaffold containing synovial mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage regeneration based on tetrahedral framework nucleic acid recruitment, Biomaterials, 278, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121131 · DOI
  151. Li, 2021, 3D printed silk-gelatin hydrogel scaffold with different porous structure and cell seeding strategy for cartilage regeneration, Bioact. Mater., 6, 3396
  152. Chen, 2020, Hierarchical macro-microporous WPU-ECM scaffolds combined with microfracture promote in situ articular cartilage regeneration in rabbits, Bioact. Mater., 6, 1932
  153. Shi, 2017, Structurally and functionally optimized silk-fibroin-gelatin scaffold using 3D printing to repair cartilage injury in vitro and in vivo, Adv. Mater., 29, 10.1002/adma.201701089 · DOI
  154. Martínez-Moreno, 2022, Chondro-inductive b-TPUe-based functionalized scaffolds for application in cartilage tissue engineering, Adv. Healthcare Mater., 11
  155. Antich, 2020, Bio-inspired hydrogel composed of hyaluronic acid and alginate as a potential bioink for 3D bioprinting of articular cartilage engineering constructs, Acta Biomater., 106, 114, 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.01.046 · DOI
  156. Gong, 2020, An interleukin-4-loaded bi-layer 3D printed scaffold promotes osteochondral regeneration, Acta Biomater., 117, 246, 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.09.039 · DOI
  157. Gao, 2021, Cell-free bilayered porous scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration fabricated by continuous 3D-printing using nascent physical hydrogel as ink, Adv. Healthcare Mater., 10, 10.1002/adhm.202001404 · DOI
  158. Idaszek, 2019, 3D bioprinting of hydrogel constructs with cell and material gradients for the regeneration of full-thickness chondral defect using a microfluidic printing head, Biofabrication, 11, 10.1088/1758-5090/ab2622 · DOI
  159. Han, 2020, Preparation of high precision multilayer scaffolds based on Melt Electro-Writing to repair cartilage injury, Theranostics, 10, 10214, 10.7150/thno.47909 · DOI
  160. Han, 2020, Preparation of high precision multilayer scaffolds based on Melt Electro-Writing to repair cartilage injury, Theranostics, 10, 10214, 10.7150/thno.47909 · DOI
  161. Gelber, 2000, Joint injury in young adults and risk for subsequent knee and hip osteoarthritis, Ann. Intern. Med., 133, 321, 10.7326/0003-4819-133-5-200009050-00007 · DOI
  162. Li, 2023, 3D printing of microenvironment-specific bioinspired and exosome-reinforced hydrogel scaffolds for efficient cartilage and subchondral bone regeneration, Adv. Sci., 10, 10.1002/advs.202303650 · DOI
  163. Guo, 2018, 3D printed biofunctionalized scaffolds for microfracture repair of cartilage defects, Biomaterials, 185, 219, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.022 · DOI
  164. Jung, 2019, Ideal scaffold design for total ear reconstruction using a three-dimensional printing technique, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater., 107, 1295, 10.1002/jbm.b.34222 · DOI
  165. Liu, 2022, 3D printing of self-standing and vascular supportive multimaterial hydrogel structures for organ engineering, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 119, 118, 10.1002/bit.27954 · DOI
  166. Gao, 2019, 3D printing of complex GelMA-based scaffolds with nanoclay, Biofabrication, 11, 10.1088/1758-5090/ab0cf6 · DOI
  167. Bhamare, 2021, 3D printing of human ear pinna using cartilage specific ink, Biomed. Mater., 16
  168. Yuan, 2022, 3D printing of all-regenerated cellulose material with truly 3D configuration: the critical role of cellulose microfiber, Carbohydr. Polym., 294, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119784 · DOI
  169. Singh, 2019, 3D bioprinting using cross-linker-free silk-gelatin bioink for cartilage tissue engineering, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 11, 33684, 10.1021/acsami.9b11644 · DOI
  170. Visscher, 2021, A photo-crosslinkable cartilage-derived extracellular matrix bioink for auricular cartilage tissue engineering, Acta Biomater., 121, 193, 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.11.029 · DOI
  171. Chen, 2020, Noninvasive in vivo 3D bioprinting, Sci. Adv., 6, 10.1126/sciadv.aba7406 · DOI
  172. Zhang, 2021, 3D direct printing of mechanical and biocompatible hydrogel meta-structures, Bioact. Mater., 10, 48
  173. Tang, 2021, Chondrocyte-laden GelMA hydrogel combined with 3D printed PLA scaffolds for auricle regeneration, Mater. Sci. Eng., C, 130, 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112423 · DOI
  174. Kang, 2016, A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity, Nat. Biotechnol., 34, 312, 10.1038/nbt.3413 · DOI · Paper page
  175. Jia, 2022, Bioprinting and regeneration of auricular cartilage using a bioactive bioink based on microporous photocrosslinkable acellular cartilage matrix, Bioact. Mater., 16, 66
  176. Lee, 2014, 3D printing of composite tissue with complex shape applied to ear regeneration, Biofabrication, 6, 10.1088/1758-5082/6/2/024103 · DOI
  177. Brand-Saberi, 2014, Trachea: anatomy and physiology, Thorac. Surg. Clin., 24, 1, 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2013.09.004 · DOI
  178. Hyde, 2009, Anatomy, pathology, and physiology of the tracheobronchial tree: emphasis on the distal airways, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 124, S72, 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.08.048 · DOI
  179. Adams, 2000, Immunosuppressive therapies for the prevention and treatment of obliterative airway disease in heterotopic rat trachea allografts, Transplantation, 69, 2260, 10.1097/00007890-200006150-00007 · DOI
  180. Gao, 2019, Long-segmental tracheal reconstruction in rabbits with pedicled Tissue-engineered trachea based on a 3D-printed scaffold, Acta Biomater., 97, 177, 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.043 · DOI
  181. Tao, 2022, Nanoparticle-stabilized emulsion bioink for digital light processing based 3D bioprinting of porous tissue constructs, Adv. Healthcare Mater., 11
  182. Hong, 2020, Digital light processing 3D printed silk fibroin hydrogel for cartilage tissue engineering, Biomaterials, 232, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119679 · DOI
  183. Kim, 2021, 3D bioprinted silk fibroin hydrogels for tissue engineering, Nat. Protoc., 16, 5484, 10.1038/s41596-021-00622-1 · DOI · Paper page
  184. Park, 2018, A rational tissue engineering strategy based on three-dimensional (3D) printing for extensive circumferential tracheal reconstruction, Biomaterials, 185, 276, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.031 · DOI
  185. Huo, 2022, Functional trachea reconstruction using 3D-bioprinted native-like tissue architecture based on designable tissue-specific bioinks, Adv. Sci., 9
  186. De Santis, 2021, Extracellular-matrix-Reinforced bioinks for 3D bioprinting human tissue, Adv. Mater., 33, 10.1002/adma.202005476 · DOI
  187. Di Gesù, 2020, 3D printing for tissue engineering in otolaryngology, Connect. Tissue Res., 61, 117, 10.1080/03008207.2019.1663837 · DOI
  188. Makris, 2015, Repair and tissue engineering techniques for articular cartilage, Nat. Rev. Rheumatol., 11, 21, 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.157 · DOI
  189. Menger, 2010, Irradiated homologous rib grafts in nasal reconstruction, Arch. Facial Plast. Surg., 12, 114, 10.1001/archfaci.2010.6 · DOI
  190. Yi, 2019, Three-dimensional printing of a patient-specific engineered nasal cartilage for augmentative rhinoplasty, J. Tissue Eng., 10, 10.1177/2041731418824797 · DOI
  191. Lan, 2022, In vitro maturation and in vivo stability of bioprinted human nasal cartilage, J. Tissue Eng., 13, 10.1177/20417314221086368 · DOI
  192. Roberts, 2006, Histology and pathology of the human intervertebral disc, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 88, 10
  193. Heo, 2021, Clinical results and complications of endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis, World Neurosurg, 145, 396, 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.10.033 · DOI
  194. Liu, 2022, High-resolution 3D printing of angle-ply annulus fibrosus scaffolds for intervertebral disc regeneration, Biofabrication, 15, 10.1088/1758-5090/aca71f · DOI
  195. Sun, 2020, A 3D-Bioprinted dual growth factor-releasing intervertebral disc scaffold induces nucleus pulposus and annulus fibrosus reconstruction, Bioact. Mater., 6, 179
  196. Ding, 2023, Cartilage lacuna-inspired microcarriers drive hyaline neocartilage regeneration, Adv. Mater., 10.1002/adma.202370216 · DOI
  197. Kong, 2020, Surgical treatment of intra-articular distal radius fractures with the assistance of three-dimensional printing technique, Medicine (Baltim.), 99
  198. Maydanshahi, 2021, 3D printing-assisted fabrication of a patient-specific antibacterial radial head prosthesis with high periprosthetic bone preservation, Biomed. Mater., 16
  199. Zhou, 2018, In Vitro regeneration of patient-specific ear-shaped cartilage and its first clinical application for auricular reconstruction, EBioMedicine, 28, 287, 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.01.011 · DOI
  200. Goddard, 2020, Ethics and policy for bioprinting, Methods Mol. Biol., 2140, 43, 10.1007/978-1-0716-0520-2_4 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 53

Metadata

Authors
Zhou, J., Li, Q., Tian, Z., Yao, Q., & Zhang, M.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Tongren Hospital (CN)
  • Capital Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Yao, Qi
  • Zhang, Mingzhu
ORCID
Venue
Materials Today Bio
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-12
Volume
23
Pages
100870
ISSN
2590-0064 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100870
PMC
PMC10765242
OpenAlex
W4388766057
Cited by
53
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 11
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Materials Today Bio (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (82202687, 82272473)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
Keywords
3D bioprinting, cartilage tissue engineering, cartilage regeneration, bionic design, hyaline cartilage, elastic cartilage, fibrocartilage, biomaterials, cytokines, tissue repair

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review