Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 333

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experimental and theoretical comparison of intracellular import of polymeric nanoparticles and small molecules: toward models of uptake kinetics

Open access
Salvati, Anna, Åberg, Christoffer, dos Santos, Tiago, Varela, Juan, Pinto, Paulo, Lynch, Iseult, Dawson, Kenneth A.·2011·Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine

Abstract

UNLABELLED Central to understanding how nanoscale objects interact with living matter is the need for reproducible and verifiable data that can be interpreted with confidence. Likely this will be the basis of durable advances in nanomedicine and nanomedical safety. To develop these fields, there is also considerable interest in advancing the first generation of theoretical models of nanoparticle (NP) uptake into cells, and NP biodistribution in general. Here we present an uptake study comparing the outcomes for free molecular dye and NPs labeled with the same dye. A simple flux-based approach is presented to model NP uptake. We find that the intracellular NP concentration grows linearly in time, and that the uptake is essentially irreversible, with the particles accumulating in lysosomes. A wide range of practical challenges, from labile dye release to NP aggregation and the need to account for cell division, are addressed to ensure that these studies yield meaningful kinetic information. FROM THE CLINICAL EDITOR The authors present an uptake study comparing the outcomes for free molecular dye and NPs labeled with the same dye. A wide range of practical challenges are addressed including labile dye release, NP aggregation and the need to account for cell division with the goal that these studies yield meaningful kinetic information.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nano.2011.03.005

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 333

Metadata

Authors
Salvati, A., Åberg, C., dos Santos, T., Varela, J., Pinto, P., Lynch, I., & Dawson, K. A.
Venue
Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
7
Issue
6
Pages
818-826
ISSN
1549-9634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131281238
Cited by
333
References
3
FWCI
8.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental and theoretical comparison of intracellular import of polymeric nanoparticles and small molecules: toward models of uptake kinetics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.nano.2011.03.005
The paper
Salvati, A., Åberg, C., dos Santos, T., Varela, J., Pinto, P., Lynch, I., & Dawson, K. A. (2011). Experimental and theoretical comparison of intracellular import of polymeric nanoparticles and small molecules: toward models of uptake kinetics. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2011.03.005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.