Cited by 4Nanoplatforms for cancer theranosticsCancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismRadiation Therapy and Dosimetry

Dual metabolic targeting liposomes potentiate triple-negative breast cancer radiosensitivity via glucose and glutathione starvation

Zhang, Henan, Liu, Yanbin, Gao, Xuezhi, Ji, Guoli, Zheng, Yanzhen, Luo, Fei, Qi, Xing, Zhao, Shasha +3 more·2025·Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) frequently develops resistance to radiotherapy, while its metabolic reliance on glucose and glutamine presents new therapeutic targets for radiotherapy sensitization. This study developed a targeted nanoliposome (G/B-Lip-R) co-delivering glucose oxidase (GOD) and buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) to enhance radiotherapy through dual metabolic intervention. GOD catalyzes glucose oxidation to generate hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2) while depleting tumor energy supplies, whereas BSO inhibits glutathione (GSH) synthesis to disrupt redox homeostasis. Their synergistic action significantly elevates intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, thereby potentiating radiosensitivity. Both in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrated that G/B-Lip-R effectively targets tumors and significantly improves radiotherapy outcomes. This work innovatively combines nanocarriers with dual metabolic pathway modulation, offering a novel strategy to overcome TNBC radioresistance with important clinical translation potential.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nano.2025.102870

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Additional strategies included depletion of intracellular glutathione and modulation of redox balance, as well as metabolic interventions targeting glycolysis or cellular energetics.

    “Additional strategies included depletion of intracellular glutathione (GSH) and modulation of redox balance [17,19,45,47,68], as well as metabolic interventions targeting glycolysis or cellular energetics [49,69,75,76].”
  • The most consistent antitumor effects were observed with integrated nanoplatforms combining high-atomic-number-mediated dose amplification with catalytic ROS generation, redox modulation, hypoxia targeting, drug delivery, or immune-modulating strategies.

    “While many studies demonstrated increased ROS generation and DNA damage following nanoparticle-assisted irradiation, the most consistent antitumor effects were observed with integrated nanoplatforms combining high-atomic-number–mediated dose amplification with catalytic ROS generation, redox modulation, hypoxia targeting, drug delivery, or immune-modulating strategies [17,21,23,39,40,45,52,68,76,7”
  • Major differences in nanoparticle composition, particle size, surface functionalization, therapeutic payloads, irradiation protocols, experimental models, and outcome assessment methods substantially complicate direct cross-study comparison and limit quantitative synthesis.

    “Major differences in nanoparticle composition, particle size, surface functionalization, therapeutic payloads, irradiation protocols, experimental models, and outcome assessment methods [15,20,24,33,37,45,52,68,76,81] substantially complicate direct cross-study comparison and limit quantitative synthesis.”
  • The translational feasibility of complex integrated nanoplatforms remains uncertain because biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, long-term toxicity, immunogenicity, manufacturing scalability, and regulatory reproducibility were infrequently evaluated.

    “While these systems often demonstrated strong preclinical efficacy [17,21,23,39,40,45,52,68,76,77], their translational feasibility remains uncertain because biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, long-term toxicity, immunogenicity, manufacturing scalability, and regulatory reproducibility were infrequently evaluated [10,11,13,16,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,102].”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, H., Liu, Y., Gao, X., Ji, G., Zheng, Y., Luo, F., Qi, X., Zhao, S., Guan, S., Wang, C., & Lu, M.
Affiliations
  • Shandong University (CN)
  • Tongji University (CN)
Corresponding author
Lu, Ming
Venue
Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-11
Volume
70
Pages
102870
ISSN
1549-9634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4415339688
Cited by
3
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nanomedicine Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (82403788)
  • Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation (ZR2025MS1194)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Keywords
triple-negative breast cancer, radiosensitization, radioresistance (biology), glucose oxidase, buthionine sulfoximine, liposomes, glucose deprivation, glutathione synthesis inhibition, reactive oxygen species, hydrogen peroxide, metabolic targeting, glutamine metabolism, redox homeostasis
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Glucose, Glucose Oxidase, Glutathione, Humans, Liposomes, Radiation Tolerance, Reactive Oxygen Species, Buthionine Sulfoximine, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review