Cited by 149

Impaired long-term spatial and recognition memory and enhanced CA1 hippocampal LTP in the dystrophin-deficient Dmdmdx mouse

Vaillend, Cyrille, Billard, Jean-Marie, Laroche, Serge·2004·Neurobiology of Disease

Abstract

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is associated with cognitive deficits that may result from dystrophin deficiency in neurons. However, in the dystrophin-deficient Dmd(mdx) mouse model of DMD, the nature of the memory impairment is not well characterised and its biological substrate is uncertain. Here, we demonstrate that dystrophin deficiency in Dmd(mdx) mice impairs long-term, but not short-term, object recognition memory and impairs long-term spatial memory, but not acquisition, following massed training in the water maze. Furthermore, we show that the abnormal enhancement of CA1 hippocampal LTP in Dmd(mdx) mice is not restricted to short-lasting mechanisms, but also affects the maintenance phase of LTP of both synaptic efficacy and neuronal excitability. We conclude that dystrophin loss alters memory consolidation in both spatial and nonspatial learning tasks, at least in part due to altered synaptic plasticity mechanisms, and suggest that the severity of the deficits may depend on the nature of the training procedure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nbd.2004.05.004

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vaillend, C., Billard, J.-M., & Laroche, S.
Venue
Neurobiology of Disease
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-10
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
10-20
ISSN
0969-9961
Cited by
149
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review