People are failing! something needs to be done: Canadian students' experience with the NCLEX-RN
Abstract
Background Canada's nurse regulators adopted the NCLEX as the entry-to-practice licensing exam for Canada's registered nurses effective January 2015. It is important to determine whether any issues from this change emerged for nursing students in preparing for and taking this new exam.Objectives To explore the experiences of Canadian graduate student nurses who were the first to write the NCLEX examination for entry to practice in Canada, determine whether any issues with implementation were identified and how these could be addressed.Design A qualitative study.Methods Thematic analysis of semi-structured interview data obtained through interviews with 202 graduate Canadian nursing students was the methodology employed in this study.Results The predominant theme that emerged from the interview data was policy related issues that students identified with preparing for and taking the NCLEX. Sub-themes included: a) temporary test centre concerns, b) perceptions of American context and content on the exam, c) lack of French language resources and translation issues, d) the limited number of opportunities to write the exam, e) communication and engagement with regulators, f) financial costs incurred and g) reputational costs for the Canadian nursing profession.Conclusions The experiences of study participants with NCLEX implementation in Canada were less than positive. This is of critical importance given the pass rates for first-time NCLEX writers in Canada were reported as 69.7%, substantially lower than pass rates on the previous Canadian entry-to-practice exam.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732305276687 · Cited by 44,601 · see citing works
Accessing Hidden and Hard-to-reach Populations: Snowball Research Strategies
Atkinson, R., & Flint, J. (2001) · eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) · Cited by 2,030 · see citing works
Qualitative Research Interviewing
Wengraf, T. (2001) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781849209717 · Cited by 2,025 · see citing works
Heckathorn, D. D. (2002) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.2002.49.1.11 · Cited by 1,914 · see citing works
Qualitative Research Interviewing: Biographic Narrative and Semi-Structured Methods
Wengraf, T. (2001) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,506 · see citing works
Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. V. (2006) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,096 · see citing works
Haussler, S. C., & Cloutterbuck, J. (2008) · The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing · doi:10.3928/00220124-20080101-07 · Cited by 941 · see citing works
Qualitative methods: what are they and why use them?
Sofaer, S. (1999) · PubMed · Cited by 866 · see citing works
Qualitative Researchers Don’t Count
Morse, J. M. (2007) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732306297322 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nursing regulation in Canada: Insights from a scoping review
Chiu, P., Thiessen, N. J., Idrees, S., Leslie, K., & Kung, J. Y. (2025) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0323716 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Registered nurses’ experiences of passing the NCLEX-RN after more than one attempt
Kasprovich, T., & VandeVusse, L. (2018) · Journal of Nursing Education · doi:10.3928/01484834-20180921-04 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Kwan, J. A., Wang, M., Cummings, G. G., Lemermeyer, G., Nordstrom, P., Blumer, L., Horne, N., & Giblin, C. (2019) · International Nursing Review · doi:10.1111/inr.12518 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Almotairy, M. M., Innab, A., Alqahtani, N., Nahari, A., Alghamdi, R., Moafa, H., & Alshael, D. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074469 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- McGillis Hall, L., Lalonde, M., & Kashin, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- ORCID
- Lalonde, Michelle
- Venue
- Nurse Education Today
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-11
- Volume
- 46
- Pages
- 43-49
- ISSN
- 0260-6917 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2517279607
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 17.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nurse Education Today (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Council of State Boards of Nursing
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
- Keywords
- NCLEX-RN, nursing licensure examination, nursing students' experiences, nursing regulation, French language resources, exam pass rates
- MeSH terms
- Canada, Clinical Competence, Communication, Costs and Cost Analysis, Educational Measurement, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Licensure, Nursing, Students, Nursing, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review