Cited by 25Nursing Education, Practice, and LeadershipNursing education and managementOccupational and Professional Licensing Regulation

People are failing! something needs to be done: Canadian students' experience with the NCLEX-RN

McGillis Hall, Linda, Lalonde, Michelle, Kashin, Jordana·2016·Nurse Education Today

Abstract

Background Canada's nurse regulators adopted the NCLEX as the entry-to-practice licensing exam for Canada's registered nurses effective January 2015. It is important to determine whether any issues from this change emerged for nursing students in preparing for and taking this new exam.Objectives To explore the experiences of Canadian graduate student nurses who were the first to write the NCLEX examination for entry to practice in Canada, determine whether any issues with implementation were identified and how these could be addressed.Design A qualitative study.Methods Thematic analysis of semi-structured interview data obtained through interviews with 202 graduate Canadian nursing students was the methodology employed in this study.Results The predominant theme that emerged from the interview data was policy related issues that students identified with preparing for and taking the NCLEX. Sub-themes included: a) temporary test centre concerns, b) perceptions of American context and content on the exam, c) lack of French language resources and translation issues, d) the limited number of opportunities to write the exam, e) communication and engagement with regulators, f) financial costs incurred and g) reputational costs for the Canadian nursing profession.Conclusions The experiences of study participants with NCLEX implementation in Canada were less than positive. This is of critical importance given the pass rates for first-time NCLEX writers in Canada were reported as 69.7%, substantially lower than pass rates on the previous Canadian entry-to-practice exam.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.08.022

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McGillis Hall, L., Lalonde, M., & Kashin, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Nurse Education Today
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
46
Pages
43-49
ISSN
0260-6917 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2517279607
Cited by
25
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4
FWCI
17.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nurse Education Today (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Council of State Boards of Nursing
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
Keywords
NCLEX-RN, nursing licensure examination, nursing students' experiences, nursing regulation, French language resources, exam pass rates
MeSH terms
Canada, Clinical Competence, Communication, Costs and Cost Analysis, Educational Measurement, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Licensure, Nursing, Students, Nursing, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review