Cited by 11Healthcare Education and Workforce IssuesNursing education and managementMedical Education and Admissions

Registered nurses’ experiences of passing the NCLEX-RN after more than one attempt

Open access
Kasprovich, Tammy, VandeVusse, Leona·2018·Journal of Nursing Education

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the past decade, little research has been conducted regarding individuals' stories about not initially being successful on the National Council Licensure Examination for Registered Nurses. An unsuccessful licensure examination attempt may affect the individual personally and profoundly in ways that could influence their future success. METHOD: Individual in-depth interviews were conducted once with 15 RNs who were initially unsuccessful on the licensure examination and subsequently passed. Data analyses were conducted using both manual and electronic coding through thematic identification. Rigor was ensured by meeting quality criteria for qualitative research. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: (a) Pressures all Around, (b) the Stigma of Being Unsuccessful, (c) Correcting the Problems, and (d) Ultimate Triumph in Discovery. CONCLUSION: Following their initial unsuccessful National Council Licen-sure Examination for Registered Nurses results, participants were deeply affected, but after accepting help from family, friends, nursing instructors, and managers, they were able to move forward, change their approaches, and become RNs. [J Nurs Educ. 2018;57(10):590-597.].

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3928/01484834-20180921-04

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Eddy L.L., Epeneter B.J. (2002). The NCLEX-RN experience: Qualitative interviews with graduates ofabaccalaureate nursing program. Journal of Nursing Education, 41, 273-278.
  2. McFarquhar C.V. (2006). Registered nurses' perception of factors leading to success on multiple attempts on the National Council Licensure Examination-Registered Nurse(NCLEX-RN) (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Walden University, MN.
  3. Silva C.L. (2014). The lived experience of graduate nurses with multiple NCLEX-RN failure (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://knowledge.library.iup.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1121&context=etd

Authors
Kasprovich, T., & VandeVusse, L.
Venue
Journal of Nursing Education
Publisher
SLACK, Inc.
Published
2018-10
Volume
57
Issue
10
Pages
590-597
ISSN
  • 0148-4834 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-2421
OpenAlex
W2894810682
Cited by
11
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Nursing Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • e-Publications@Marquette (Marquette University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
Keywords
NCLEX-RN, nursing licensure examination, registered nurses, nursing students, stigma of failure, social support, family and friends, nursing faculty, nurse managers, resilience, personal narrative
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adult, Educational Measurement, Female, Humans, Licensure, Nursing, Life Change Events, Male, Stress, Psychological, Students, Nursing, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review