Cited by 6,086Gene expression and cancer classificationBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

UALCAN: A Portal for Facilitating Tumor Subgroup Gene Expression and Survival Analyses

Open access
Chandrashekar, Darshan S., Bashel, Bhuwan, Balasubramanya, Sai Akshaya Hodigere, Creighton, Chad J., Ponce-Rodriguez, Israel, Chakravarthi, Balabhadrapatruni V.S.K., Varambally, Sooryanarayana·2017·Neoplasia

Abstract

Genomics data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project has led to the comprehensive molecular characterization of multiple cancer types. The large sample numbers in TCGA offer an excellent opportunity to address questions associated with tumo heterogeneity. Exploration of the data by cancer researchers and clinicians is imperative to unearth novel therapeutic/diagnostic biomarkers. Various computational tools have been developed to aid researchers in carrying out specific TCGA data analyses; however there is need for resources to facilitate the study of gene expression variations and survival associations across tumors. Here, we report UALCAN, an easy to use, interactive web-portal to perform to in-depth analyses of TCGA gene expression data. UALCAN uses TCGA level 3 RNA-seq and clinical data from 31 cancer types. The portal's user-friendly features allow to perform: 1) analyze relative expression of a query gene(s) across tumor and normal samples, as well as in various tumor sub-groups based on individual cancer stages, tumor grade, race, body weight or other clinicopathologic features, 2) estimate the effect of gene expression level and clinicopathologic features on patient survival; and 3) identify the top over- and under-expressed (up and down-regulated) genes in individual cancer types. This resource serves as a platform for in silico validation of target genes and for identifying tumor sub-group specific candidate biomarkers. Thus, UALCAN web-portal could be extremely helpful in accelerating cancer research. UALCAN is publicly available at http://ualcan.path.uab.edu.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neo.2017.05.002

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In human HCCs, higher expression of GSTM3 was associated with shorter survival.

    “In human HCCs, higher expression of GSTM3 was associated with shorter survival (fig. S7E) (44, 45).”

    From The origin of hepatocellular carcinoma depends on metabolic zonation (2026) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Methods (Data Analyses; page unavailable) describe survival analyses by gene expression, and the Results (Usage of UALCAN; page unavailable) discuss liver hepatocellular carcinoma. Neither reports a GSTM3 survival result or says whether higher GSTM3 expression is associated with shorter survival. Searches for GSTM3 and its full gene name found no such passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. [1]Sheehan KM Calvert VS Kay EW Lu Y Fishman D Espina V Aquino J Speer R Araujo R Mills GB Use of reverse phase protein microarrays and reference standard development for molecular network analysis of metastatic ovarian carcinoma Mol Cell Proteomics 4 4 2005 346 355 15671044
  2. [2]Trevino V Falciani F Barrera-Saldana HA DNA microarrays: a powerful genomic tool for biomedical and clinical research Mol Med 13 9–10 2007 527 541 17660860 PMC1933257
  3. [3]Reuter JA Spacek DV Snyder MP High-throughput sequencing technologies Mol Cell 58 4 2015 586 597 26000844 PMC4494749
  4. [4]Tomczak K Czerwinska P Wiznerowicz M The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA): an immeasurable source of knowledge Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 19 1A 2015 A68 A77 25691825 PMC4322527
  5. [5]Cancer Genome Atlas Research N Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways Nature 455 7216 2008 1061 1068 18772890 PMC2671642
  6. [7]Cancer Genome Atlas N Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours Nature 490 7418 2012 61 70 23000897 PMC3465532
  7. [9]Cancer Genome Atlas Research N Genomic and epigenomic landscapes of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia N Engl J Med 368 22 2013 2059 2074 23634996 PMC3767041
  8. [10]Cancer Genome Atlas Research N Kandoth C Schultz N Cherniack AD Akbani R Liu Y Shen H Robertson AG Pashtan I Shen R Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma Nature 497 7447 2013 67 73 23636398 PMC3704730
  9. [11]Cancer Genome Atlas Research N Comprehensive molecular characterization of urothelial bladder carcinoma Nature 507 7492 2014 315 322 24476821 PMC3962515
  10. [14]Cancer Genome Atlas Research N Integrated genomic characterization of papillary thyroid carcinoma Cell 159 3 2014 676 690 25417114 PMC4243044
  11. [15]Cancer Genome Atlas N Comprehensive genomic characterization of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas Nature 517 7536 2015 576 582 25631445 PMC4311405
  12. [16]Cancer Genome Atlas N Genomic Classification of Cutaneous Melanoma Cell 161 7 2015 1681 1696 26091043 PMC4580370
  13. [17]Cancer Genome Atlas Research N The Molecular Taxonomy of Primary Prostate Cancer Cell 163 4 2015 1011 1025 26544944 PMC4695400
  14. [18]Ciriello G Gatza ML Beck AH Wilkerson MD Rhie SK Pastore A Zhang H McLellan M Yau C Kandoth C Comprehensive Molecular Portraits of Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer Cell 163 2 2015 506 519 26451490 PMC4603750
  15. [20]Ceccarelli M Barthel FP Malta TM Sabedot TS Salama SR Murray BA Morozova O Newton Y Radenbaugh A Pagnotta SM Molecular Profiling Reveals Biologically Discrete Subsets and Pathways of Progression in Diffuse Glioma Cell 164 3 2016 550 563 26824661 PMC4754110
  16. [21]Zheng S Cherniack AD Dewal N Moffitt RA Danilova L Murray BA Lerario AM Else T Knijnenburg TA Ciriello G Comprehensive Pan-Genomic Characterization of Adrenocortical Carcinoma Cancer Cell 29 5 2016 723 736 27165744 PMC4864952
  17. [22]Cancer Genome Atlas Research N Integrated genomic and molecular characterization of cervical cancer Nature 543 7645 2017 378 384 28112728 PMC5354998
  18. [23]Cancer Genome Atlas Research N Analysis Working Group: Asan U Agency BCC Brigham, Women's H Broad I Brown U Case Western Reserve U Dana-Farber Cancer I Duke U Greater Poland Cancer C Integrated genomic characterization of oesophageal carcinoma Nature 541 7636 2017 169 175 28052061 PMC5651175
  19. [24]Fishbein L Leshchiner I Walter V Danilova L Robertson AG Johnson AR Lichtenberg TM Murray BA Ghayee HK Else T Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma Cancer Cell 31 2 2017 181 193 28162975 PMC5643159
  20. [26]Gao J Aksoy BA Dogrusoz U Dresdner G Gross B Sumer SO Sun Y Jacobsen A Sinha R Larsson E Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal Sci Signal 6 269 2013 pl1 23550210 PMC4160307
  21. [27]Zhu Y Qiu P Ji Y TCGA-assembler: open-source software for retrieving and processing TCGA data Nat Methods 11 6 2014 599 600 24874569 PMC4387197
  22. [28]Samur MK RTCGAToolbox: a new tool for exporting TCGA Firehose data PLoS One 9 9 2014 e106397 25181531 PMC4152273
  23. [29]Cho S Jang I Jun Y Yoon S Ko M Kwon Y Choi I Chang H Ryu D Lee B MiRGator v3.0: a microRNA portal for deep sequencing, expression profiling and mRNA targeting Nucleic Acids Res 41 Database issue 2013 D252 D257 23193297 PMC3531224
  24. [30]Li J Han L Roebuck P Diao L Liu L Yuan Y Weinstein JN Liang H TANRIC: An Interactive Open Platform to Explore the Function of lncRNAs in Cancer Cancer Res 75 18 2015 3728 3737 26208906 PMC4573884
  25. [31]Yang IS Son H Kim S Kim S ISOexpresso: a web-based platform for isoform-level expression analysis in human cancer BMC Genomics 17 1 2016 631 27519173 PMC4983006
  26. [32]Spainhour JC Lim J Qiu P GDISC: a web portal for integrative analysis of gene-drug interaction for survival in cancer Bioinformatics 33 9 2017 1426 1428 28453687 PMC5859986
  27. [33]Lee H Palm J Grimes SM Ji HP The Cancer Genome Atlas Clinical Explorer: a web and mobile interface for identifying clinical-genomic driver associations Genome Med 7 2015 112 26507825 PMC4624593
  28. [34]Goswami CP Nakshatri H PROGgeneV2: enhancements on the existing database BMC Cancer 14 2014 970 25518851 PMC4300843
  29. [35]Rhodes DR Yu J Shanker K Deshpande N Varambally R Ghosh D Barrette T Pandey A Chinnaiyan AM ONCOMINE: a cancer microarray database and integrated data-mining platform Neoplasia 6 1 2004 1 6 15068665 PMC1635162
  30. [36]Rhodes DR Kalyana-Sundaram S Mahavisno V Varambally R Yu J Briggs BB Barrett TR Anstet MJ Kincead-Beal C Kulkarni P Oncomine 3.0: genes, pathways, and networks in a collection of 18,000 cancer gene expression profiles Neoplasia 9 2 2007 166 180 17356713 PMC1813932
  31. [37]Allison KH Sledge GW Heterogeneity and cancer Oncology (Williston Park) 28 9 2014 772 778 25224475
  32. [38]Agarwal V Bell GW Nam JW Bartel DP Predicting effective microRNA target sites in mammalian mRNAs Elife 4 2015 e05005 PMC4532895 26267216
  33. [39]Uhlen M Fagerberg L Hallstrom BM Lindskog C Oksvold P Mardinoglu A Sivertsson Å Kampf C Sjöstedt E Asplund A Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome Science 347 6220 2015 1260419 25613900
  34. [40]Li B Dewey CN RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome BMC Bioinform 12 2011 323 PMC3163565 21816040
  35. [41]Li B Ruotti V Stewart RM Thomson JA Dewey CN RNA-Seq gene expression estimation with read mapping uncertainty Bioinformatics 26 4 2010 493 500 20022975 PMC2820677
  36. [42]Chen X Li J Gray WH Lehmann BD Bauer JA Shyr Y Pietenpol JA TNBCtype: A Subtyping Tool for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cancer Informat 11 2012 147 156 PMC3412597 22872785
  37. [43]Lehmann BD Bauer JA Chen X Sanders ME Chakravarthy AB Shyr Y Pietenpol JA Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies J Clin Invest 121 7 2011 2750 2767 21633166 PMC3127435
  38. [48]Blows FM Driver KE Schmidt MK Broeks A van Leeuwen FE Wesseling J Cheang MC Gelmon K Nielsen TO Blomqvist C Subtyping of breast cancer by immunohistochemistry to investigate a relationship between subtype and short and long term survival: a collaborative analysis of data for 10,159 cases from 12 studies PLoS Med 7 5 2010 e1000279 20520800 PMC2876119
  39. [49]Ricketts CJ Hill VK Linehan WM Tumor-specific hypermethylation of epigenetic biomarkers, including SFRP1, predicts for poorer survival in patients from the TCGA Kidney Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma (KIRC) project PLoS One 9 1 2014 e85621 24454902 PMC3893219
  40. [50]Zhang W TCGA divides gastric cancer into four molecular subtypes: implications for individualized therapeutics Chin J Cancer 33 10 2014 469 470 25223913 PMC4198748
  41. [51]Brodie SA Li G Brandes JC Molecular characteristics of non-small cell lung cancer with reduced CHFR expression in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project Respir Med 109 1 2015 131 136 25477232 PMC4277914
  42. [52]Peters I Tezval H Kramer MW Wolters M Grunwald V Kuczyk MA Serth J Implications of TCGA Network Data on 2nd Generation Immunotherapy Concepts Based on PD-L1 and PD-1 Target Structures Aktuelle Urol 46 6 2015 481 485 26560846

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chandrashekar, D. S., Bashel, B., Balasubramanya, S. A. H., Creighton, C. J., Ponce-Rodriguez, I., Chakravarthi, B. V. S. K., & Varambally, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Varambally, Sooryanarayana
Venue
Neoplasia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
19
Issue
8
Pages
649-658
ISSN
1476-5586 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2736730167
Cited by
6,086
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 271 · 2025: 534 · 2024: 676 · 2023: 938 · 2022: 1326 · 2021: 1192 · 2020: 769 · 2019: 282 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
127.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neoplasia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  • University of Alabama
  • National Institutes of Health (CA125123)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA154980, CA125123, R01CA157845, P30CA125123)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Keywords
web portal, TCGA, tumor heterogeneity, tumor subtypes, gene expression, survival analysis, RNA-seq, biomarker discovery, tumor stage, tumor grade, clinicopathological features, up- and down-regulated genes, in silico validation
MeSH terms
Humans, Neoplasms, Prognosis, Software, User-Computer Interface, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Survival Analysis, Computational Biology, Gene Expression Profiling, Databases, Genetic, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Web Browser

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review