Cited by 741Statistical Methods and InferenceProbability and Statistical ResearchStatistical Distribution Estimation and Applications

Survival analysis part II: multivariate data analysis – an introduction to concepts and methods

Open access
Bradburn, M J, Clark, T G, Love, S B, Altman, D G·2003·British Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Survival analysis involves the consideration of the time between a fixed starting point (e.g. diagnosis of cancer) and a terminating event (e.g. death). The key feature that distinguishes such data from other types is that the event will not necessarily have occurred in all individuals by the time the study ends, and for these patients, their full survival times are unknown. For instance, in studies that measure the length of survival after diagnosis of cancer, it is common for a proportion of individuals to remain alive and disease-free at the end of the follow-up period, and for these patients, we know only a lower limit on their actual time to event. Thus, special methods are required for these type of data. The explanation and demonstration of some of the methods proposed to analyse such data are the basis of this series.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601119

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The proportional hazards assumption was assessed using the log(−log(survival)) plot.

    “The proportional hazards assumption was assessed using the log(−log(survival)) plot, and those that failed the assumption or that were deemed to be time dependent were entered as continuous time-dependent covariates (Bradburn et al, 2003).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 16 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bradburn, M. J., Clark, T. G., Love, S. B., & Altman, D. G.
Affiliations
Cancer Research UK (GB)
Corresponding author
Bradburn, M J
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2003-07-29
Volume
89
Issue
3
Pages
431-436
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W2107482271
Cited by
741
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 24
FWCI
7.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Cancer Research UK
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Keywords
survival analysis, multivariate survival data, censored data, time to event, cancer survival, censoring
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Neoplasms, Models, Statistical, Multivariate Analysis, Survival Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review