The DOI matches its Crossref record; 214 of the 220 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of ‘Systems for Social Processes' in eating disorders
Open accessAbstract
Social and emotional problems have been implicated in the development and maintenance of eating disorders (ED). This paper reviews the facets of social processing in ED according to the NIMH Research and Domain Criteria (NIMH RDoC) 'Systems for Social Processes' framework. Embase, Medline, PsycInfo and Web of Science were searched for peer-reviewed articles published by March 2013. One-hundred and fifty four studies measuring constructs of: attachment, social communication, perception and understanding of self and others, and social dominance in people with ED, were identified. Eleven meta-analyses were performed, they showed evidence that people with ED had attachment insecurity (d=1.31), perceived low parental care (d=.51), appraised high parental overprotection (d=0.29), impaired facial emotion recognition (d=.44) and facial communication (d=2.10), increased facial avoidance (d=.52), reduced agency (d=.39), negative self-evaluation (d=2.27), alexithymia (d=.66), poor understanding of mental states (d=1.07) and sensitivity to social dominance (d=1.08). There is less evidence for problems with production and reception of non-facial communication, animacy and action.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Meta-analyses have found that people with eating disorders (EDs), depression, schizophrenia, and autism spectrum disorders (ASD) have similar difficulties in accurate interpretation of emotions, including recognition of basic emotions in faces and tone of voice with small effect sizes and in emotional theory of mind with medium to large effect sizes (Bora and Berk, 2016;Bora and Köse, 2016;Caglar-”
From Meta-analysis of the effects of intranasal oxytocin on interpretation and expression of emotions (2017) · cites this paper as Caglar-Nazali et al., 2014
In the citing paper
“Beyond reward difficulties in relation to food, current models also recognize the importance of social and emotional difficulties in the development, maintenance, and recovery from eating disorders (91, 92).”
From A transdiagnostic perspective on social anhedonia (2019) · cites this paper as [92]
Citations
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias
Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533446 · Cited by 16,955
Insel, T., Cuthbert, B., Garvey, M., Heinssen, R., Pine, D. S., Quinn, K., Sanislow, C., & Wang, P. (2010) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09091379 · Cited by 7,067
Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511 · Cited by 6,247
Bagby, R. M., Parker, J. D. A., & Taylor, G. J. (1994) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(94)90005-1 · Cited by 5,293
Baron‐Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00715 · Cited by 4,555
Baron‐Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S. J., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 4,313
A parental bonding instrument.
Parker, G., Tupling, H., & Brown, L. B. (1979) · British Journal of Medical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8341.1979.tb02487.x · Cited by 3,788
Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: the seven pillars of RDoC
Cuthbert, B. N., & Insel, T. R. (2013) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-11-126 · Cited by 3,053
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Cardi, 2013, Involuntary subordinate self-perception in eating disorders: an investigation of attentional bias to social rank and implicit processing of self-concept, PLoS One
- Coopersmith, 1967, vol. 23
- Deborde, 2008, The bermond-vorst Alexithymia questionnaire cutoff scores: a study in eating-disordered and control subjects, Psychopathology, 41, 43, 10.1159/000109955 · DOI · Paper page
- O’Brien, 1988, MSEI: the Multidimensional self-esteem inventory, Psychol. Assess. Resour.
- Paterson, 2011, A mediational model of self-esteem and social problem-solving in anorexia nervosa, Eur. Eat. Disord. Rev., 19, 112, 10.1002/erv.1021 · DOI
- Rosenberg, 1965, Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSE), Accept. Commit. Therapy, 61
- Waller, 2000, Cognitive content among bulimic women: the role of core beliefs, Int. J. Eat. Disord., 28, 235, 10.1002/1098-108X(200009)28:2<235::AID-EAT15>3.0.CO;2-1 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Treasure, J. L., Duarte, T. A., & Schmidt, U. H. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30059-3 · Cited by 1,110
Anorexia nervosa: aetiology, assessment, and treatment
Zipfel, S., Giel, K. E., Bulik, C. M., Hay, P., & Schmidt, U. H. (2015) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(15)00356-9 · Cited by 907
Cotter, J., Granger, K., Backx, R., Hobbs, M., Looi, C. Y., & Barnett, J. H. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.11.014 · Cited by 369
Treasure, J., Stein, D., & Maguire, S. (2015) · Early Intervention in Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/eip.12170 · Cited by 353
Micali, N., Martini, M. G., Thomas, J. J., Eddy, K. T., Kothari, R., Russell, E., Bulik, C. M., & Treasure, J. (2017) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-016-0766-4 · Cited by 245
Metadata
- Authors
- Caglar-Nazali, H. P., Corfield, F., Cardi, V., Ambwani, S., Leppanen, J., Olabintan, O., Deriziotis, S., Hadjimichalis, A., Scognamiglio, P., Eshkevari, E., Micali, N., & Treasure, J.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Dickinson College (US)
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Corfield, Freya
- ORCID
- Venue
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-05
- Volume
- 42
- Pages
- 55-92
- ISSN
- 0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017793106
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 220
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 9
- FWCI
- 2.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
- Keywords
- eating disorders, social processes, insecure attachment, parental overprotection, facial emotion recognition, facial communication, agency, self-assessment, alexithymia, theory of mind, social dominance, social communication
- MeSH terms
- Feeding and Eating Disorders, Humans, Self Concept, Social Perception, Social Skills
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
