Cited by 3,788Attachment and Relationship DynamicsFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

A parental bonding instrument.

Parker, Gordon, Tupling, Hilary, Brown, L. B.·1979·British Journal of Medical Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1979.tb02487.x

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parker, G., Tupling, H., & Brown, L. B.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Parker, Gordon
  • Tupling, Hilary
Venue
British Journal of Medical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1979-03
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
1-10
ISSN
0007-1129 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965170571
Cited by
3,788
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 85 · 2025: 126 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 134 · 2022: 136 · 2021: 137 · 2020: 136 · 2019: 138 · 2018: 113 · 2017: 121 · 2016: 135 · 2015: 140 · 2014: 152 · 2013: 157 · 2012: 121
FWCI
14.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
British Journal of Medical Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
parental bonding, parent-child relationship, psychometric scale, questionnaire development, child development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review