Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 184 of the 184 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social, self, (situational), and affective processes in medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC): Causal, multivariate, and reverse inference evidence

Lieberman, Matthew D., Straccia, Mark A., Meyer, Meghan L., Du, Meng, Tan, Kevin M.·2019·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

HighlightsWe consider four methods that have reverse inference or causal inference value to assessing the function of the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC).Significant clusters within MPFC were each associated more strongly with social cognition, self, value, or emotional experience processes. A ventral MPFC cluster for social cognition was unexpected.We identified a relatively non‐selective region of ventral MPFC that may support situational processing, a process key to each domain, but also independent of each. &NA; The medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) has been posited to serve a variety of social, affective, and cognitive functions. These conclusions have largely been driven by forward inference analyses (e.g. GLM fMRI studies and meta‐analyses) that indicate where domain‐specific tasks tend to produce activity but tell us little about what those regions do. Here, we take a multi‐method, multi‐domain approach to the functionality of MPFC subdivisions within Brodmann areas 9‐11. We consider four methods that each have reverse inference or causal inference value: lesion work, transcranial magnetic stimulation, multivariate pattern analysis, and Neurosynth analyses. The Neurosynth analyses include multi‐term reverse inference analyses that compare several domains of interest to one another at once. We examine the evidence supporting structure‐function links in five domains: social cognition, self, value, emotional experience, and mental time travel. The evidence is considered for each of three MPFC subdivisions: dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC), anteromedial prefrontal cortex (AMPFC), and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC). Although there is evidentiary variability across methods, the results suggest that social processes are functionally linked to DMPFC (and somewhat surprisingly in VMPFC), self processes are linked to AMPFC, and affective processes are linked to AMPFC and VMPFC. There is also a relatively non‐selective region of VMPFC that may support situational processing, a process key to each domain, but also independent of each.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.021

Cites

184 of 184 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 184 references

Cited by

See all 268

Metadata

Authors
Lieberman, M. D., Straccia, M. A., Meyer, M. L., Du, M., & Tan, K. M.
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
99
Pages
311-328
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2907341743
Cited by
268
References
184
FWCI
16.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social, self, (situational), and affective processes in medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC): Causal, multivariate, and reverse inference evidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.021
The paper
Lieberman, M. D., Straccia, M. A., Meyer, M. L., Du, M., & Tan, K. M. (2019). Social, self, (situational), and affective processes in medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC): Causal, multivariate, and reverse inference evidence. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.021

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.