Cited by 62Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMind wandering and attention

Trait Mindfulness and Functional Connectivity in Cognitive and Attentional Resting State Networks

Open access
Parkinson, Tracie D., Kornelsen, Jennifer, Smith, Stephen D.·2019·Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Abstract

Mindfulness has been described as an orienting of attention to the present moment, with openness and compassion. Individuals displaying high trait mindfulness exhibit this tendency as a more permanent personality attribute. Given the numerous physical and mental health benefits associated with mindfulness, there is a great interest in understanding the neural substrates of this trait. The purpose of the current research was to examine how individual differences in trait mindfulness associated with functional connectivity in five resting-state networks related to cognition and attention: the default mode network, the salience network, the central executive network, and the dorsal and ventral attention networks. Twenty-eight undergraduate participants completed the Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), a self-report measure of trait mindfulness which also provides scores on five of its sub-categories (Observing, Describing, Acting with Awareness, Non-judging of Inner Experience, and Non-reactivity to Inner Experience). Participants then underwent a structural MRI scan and a seven-minute resting state functional MRI scan. Resting-state data were analyzed using independent-component analyses. An analysis of covariance was performed to determine the relationship between each resting state network and each FFMQ score. These analyses indicated that (1) trait mindfulness and its facets showed increased functional connectivity with neural regions related to attentional control, interoception, and executive function; and (2) trait mindfulness and its facets showed decreased functional connectivity with neural regions related to self-referential processing and mind wandering. These patterns of functional connectivity are consistent with some of the benefits of mindfulness – enhanced attention, self-regulation, and focus on present experience. This study provides support for the notion that non-judgmental attention to the present moment facilitates the integration of regions in neural networks that are related to cognition, attention, and sensation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00112

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Differences in insula-thalamus connectivity have been reported in meditators compared with nonmeditators, and after psychopharmacological administration of lysergic acid diethylamide.

    “differences in insula–thalamus connectivity have been reported in meditators compared with nonmeditators, and after psychopharmacological administration of lysergic acid diethylamide, which possesses robust anti-depressant and anxiolytic properties.46,47”

    From Distinct and shared therapeutic neural mechanisms of mindfulness-based and social support stress reduction groups in adults with autism spectrum disorder (2023) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Discussion (Facets of Trait Mindfulness; page unavailable) reports connectivity differences involving the insula and, separately, differences between meditators and controls involving the MPFC—not insula–thalamus connectivity. Searches for insula–thalamus connectivity and lysergic acid diethylamide found no passage addressing either part of the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parkinson, T. D., Kornelsen, J., & Smith, S. D.
Affiliations
University of Manitoba (CA)
Corresponding author
Smith, Stephen D.
Venue
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2019-04-12
Volume
13
Pages
112-112
ISSN
1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2937867808
Cited by
62
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
Keywords
trait mindfulness, functional connectivity, resting-state networks, default mode network, salience network, frontoparietal network, dorsal attention network, ventral attention network, Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire, mindfulness facets, interoception, self-referential processing, mind wandering, attentional control, executive function, self-regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review