Cited by 105Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsAutophagy in Disease and TherapyAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Microglial mitophagy mitigates neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease

Open access
Lautrup, Sofie, Lou, Guofeng, Aman, Yahyah, Nilsen, Hilde, Tao, Jun, Fang, Evandro F.·2019·Neurochemistry International

Abstract

In neurons, defective mitophagy results in accumulation of damaged mitochondria, and finally leading to various neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, how mitophagy is defective in AD as well as how defective mitophagy contributes to AD is not fully understood. We give commentary on recent progress of this topic, highlighting the importance of mitophagy not only in neurons, but also in microglia, in forestalling pathology and cognitive decline in different animal models of AD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuint.2019.104469

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The molecular mechanism by which NAD+ suppresses neuroinflammation involves elimination of damaged pro-inflammatory mitochondria and inhibition of the NLRP3 inflammasome.

    “The underlying molecular mechanism by which NAD+ suppresses neuroinflammation involves the elimination of damaged pro-inflammatory mitochondria and inhibition of the major inflammasome NLRP3 (Fang et al., 2019; Lautrup et al., 2019).”

    From NAD+ in Brain Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders (2019) · cites this paper as Lautrup et al., 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lautrup, S., Lou, G., Aman, Y., Nilsen, H., Tao, J., & Fang, E. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Tao, Jun
  • Fang, Evandro F.
Venue
Neurochemistry International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
129
Pages
104469
ISSN
0197-0186 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2945917308
Cited by
105
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurochemistry International (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Norges Forskningsråd
  • Helse Sør-Øst RHF
  • Akershus Universitetssykehus
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
mitophagy, microglia, neuroinflammation, Alzheimer's disease, mitochondrial dysfunction, neurodegeneration, cognitive decline, animal models of Alzheimer's disease
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Autophagy, Humans, Inflammation, Mitochondria, Neurons, Microglia, Mitophagy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review