Cited by 112

Re-emphasizing early Alzheimer’s disease pathology starting in select entorhinal neurons, with a special focus on mitophagy

Kobro-Flatmoen, Asgeir, Lagartos-Donate, Maria Jose, Aman, Yahyah, Edison, Paul, Witter, Menno P., Fang, Evandro F.·2021·Ageing Research Reviews

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101307

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DEGs linked to non-vulnerable subtypes were enriched for ubiquitin-ligase binding, heat-shock-family chaperones, ER protein processing and mediators of neuronal death, whereas vulnerability-associated DEGs were highly enriched only for mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation but included CRK and NEUROD2, which are associated with Reelin signalling.

    “DEGs linked to non-vulnerable subtypes were enriched for a diverse set of functions, including ubiquitin-ligase binding, heat-shock-family chaperones, ER protein processing and mediators of neuronal death, whereas vulnerability-associated DEGs were highly enriched only for mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation but included CRK and NEUROD2, which are both associated with Reelin signalling17,18”

    From Single-cell multiregion dissection of Alzheimer’s disease (2024) · cites this paper as [18]

  • Five excitatory neuron subtypes were reduced in patients with AD (vulnerable subtypes) in the early-affected EC and HC, including EC layer II (L2), RORB-positive L5 (AGBL1+GPC5+) and hippocampal CA1 subfield neurons.

    “We identified five excitatory neuron subtypes that were reduced in patients with AD (vulnerable subtypes) in the early-affected EC and HC1,17,18, including EC layer II (L2), RORB-positive L5 (AGBL1+GPC5+)19 and hippocampal CA1 subfield neurons20–23.”

    From Single-cell multiregion dissection of Alzheimer’s disease (2024) · cites this paper as [18]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Braak, H., 1980. Architectonics of the Human Telencephalic Cortex, Vol 4. Springer Science & Business Media.
  2. Cappaert, N.L.M., Van Strien, N.M., Witter, M.P., 2015. Hippocampal formation. In: Paxinos, G. (Ed.), The Rat Nervous System. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, CA, US; London, UK, pp. 511-574.
  3. Chen, Y., Durakoglugil, M.S., Xian, X., Herz, J., 2010. ApoE4 reduces glutamate receptor function and synaptic plasticity by selectively impairing ApoE receptor recycling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107, 12011-12016.
  4. Franjic, D., Choi, J., Skarica, M., Xu, C., Li, Q., Ma, S., Tebbenkamp, A.T.N., Santpere, G., Arellano, J.I., Gudelj, I., et al., 2020. Molecular diversity among adult human hippocampal and entorhinal cells. bioRxiv 2019, 2012.2031.889139.
  5. Goedert, M., Ghetti, B., Spillantini, M.G., 2012. Frontotemporal Dementia: Implications for Understanding Alzheimer Disease, vol. 2. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med a006254.
  6. Huang, Y.A., Zhou, B., Wernig, M., Sudhof, T.C., 2017. ApoE2, ApoE3, and ApoE4 differentially stimulate APP transcription and abeta secretion. Cell 168 (427-441), e421.
  7. Insausti, R., Amaral, D.G., 2012. Chapter 24 -hippocampal formation. In: Mai, K.J., Paxinos, G. (Eds.), The Human Nervous System, 3rd edition. Academic Press.
  8. Kobro-Flatmoen, A., Witter, M.P., 2019. Neuronal chemo-architecture of the entorhinal cortex: a comparative review. Eur. J. Neurosci. 50, 3627-3662.
  9. Mandelkow, E.M., Mandelkow, E., 2012. Biochemistry and Cell Biology of Tau Protein in Neurofibrillary Degeneration, vol. 2. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med a006247.
  10. Nieuwenhuys, R., Voogd, J., van Huijzen, C., 2008. The Human Central Nervous System, 4 edn. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, New York.
  11. Ritchey, M., Libby, L.A., Ranganath, C., 2015. Cortico-hippocampal systems involved in memory and cognition: the PMAT framework. Prog Brain Res. Elsevier, pp. 45-64.
  12. Witter, M.P., 2012. Hippocampus. In: Watson, C., Paxinos, G., Puelles, L. (Eds.), The Mouse Nervous System. Academic Press, pp. 112-139.
  13. Witter, M.P., Doan, T.P., Jacobsen, B., Nilssen, E.S., Ohara, S., 2017. Architecture of the entorhinal cortex a review of entorhinal anatomy in rodents with some comparative notes. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 11, 46.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kobro-Flatmoen, A., Lagartos-Donate, M. J., Aman, Y., Edison, P., Witter, M. P., & Fang, E. F.
Venue
Ageing Research Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
67
Pages
101307
ISSN
1568-1637
Cited by
112
References
45
Language
en
Funders
  • South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Research Council of Norway

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review