The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impulse inhibition in people with Internet addiction disorder: Electrophysiological evidence from a Go/NoGo study
Abstract
We investigated response inhibition in people with Internet addiction disorder (IAD) by recording event-related brain potentials during a Go/NoGo task. Twelve IAD-afflicted and 12 normal university students participated in the study. Results show that the IAD group exhibited lower NoGo-N2 amplitude, higher NoGo-P3 amplitude, and longer NoGo-P3 peak latency than the normal group. The results also suggest that the IAD students had lower activation in the conflict detection stage than the normal group; thus, they had to engage in more cognitive endeavors to complete the inhibition task in the late stage. In addition, the IAD students showed less efficiency in information processing and lower impulse control than their normal peers.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“En contraste, en algunos estudios no se da tal alteración (Dong et al., 2010; Dong et al., 2014; Dong et al., 2015; Sun et al 2009; Wang et al., 2017d; Zhang et al., 2016)”
From Adicciones a internet y funciones ejecutivas en estudiantes universitarios: una revisión sistemática (2020) · cites this paper as Dong et al., 2010
Citations
Cites
A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use
Davis, R. A. (2001) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0747-5632(00)00041-8 · Cited by 3,010
Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: A review
Folstein, J. R., & Van Petten, C. (2008) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00602.x · Cited by 2,567
Donchin, E. (1981) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb01815.x · Cited by 1,938
The Relationship Between Depression and Internet Addiction
YOUNG, K. S., & ROGERS, R. C. (1998) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.1998.1.25 · Cited by 1,233
ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition
Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., & Hohnsbein, J. (1999) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/s0001-6918(99)00008-6 · Cited by 1,149
Modification in the Proposed Diagnostic Criteria for Internet Addiction
Beard, K. W., & Wolf, E. (2001) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/109493101300210286 · Cited by 1,019
Neuropsychology and neuropharmacology of P3a and P3b
Polich, J. M., & Criado, J. R. (2006) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.12.012 · Cited by 768
The N2 in go/no-go tasks reflects conflict monitoring not response inhibition
Donkers, F. C. L., & van Boxtel, G. J. M. (2004) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2004.04.005 · Cited by 749
Movement-related potentials in the Go/NoGo task: The P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition
Smith, J. L., Johnstone, S. J., & Barry, R. J. (2008) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.11.042 · Cited by 461
The impact of impulsivity on cocaine use and retention in treatment
Moeller, F. G., Dougherty, D. M., Barratt, E. S., Schmitz, J. M., Swann, A. C., & Grabowski, J. G. (2001) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/s0740-5472(01)00202-1 · Cited by 455
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brand, M., Young, K. S., Laier, C., Wölfling, K., & Potenza, M. N. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.033 · Cited by 2,416
The Association between Pathological Internet Use and Comorbid Psychopathology: A Systematic Review
Carli, V., Durkee, T., Wasserman, D., Hadlaczky, G., Despalins, R., Kramarz, E., Wasserman, C., Sarchiapone, M., Hoven, C. W., Brunner, R., et al. (2013) · Psychopathology · doi:10.1159/000337971 · Cited by 639
Brand, M., Young, K. S., & Laier, C. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00375 · Cited by 565
Dong, G., & Potenza, M. N. (2014) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.07.005 · Cited by 559
“Reduced response-inhibition and cognitive-control tendencies or abilities have been demonstrated in subjects with IGD (as compared to those without) using go/no-go (Dong et al., 2010), Stroop (Dong et al.”
MethodSelf-citationDeficits in behavioural inhibition in substance abuse and addiction: a meta-analysis.
Smith, J. L., Mattick, R. P., Jamadar, S. D., & Iredale, J. M. (2014) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.08.009 · Cited by 546
Metadata
- Authors
- Dong, G., Lu, Q., Zhou, H., & Zhao, X.
- Affiliations
- Zhejiang Normal University (CN)
- University of Oregon (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dong, Guangheng
- Venue
- Neuroscience Letters
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 485
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 138-142
- ISSN
- 0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2045800887
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 41.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Keywords
- internet addiction, response inhibition, impulse control, event-related potentials, go/no-go task, Nogo-N2, Nogo-P3, conflict detection, processing efficiency
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Neural Inhibition, Behavior, Addictive, Internet, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
