Cited by 639Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyGambling Behavior and Treatments

The Association between Pathological Internet Use and Comorbid Psychopathology: A Systematic Review

Open access
Carli, V., Durkee, T., Wasserman, D., Hadlaczky, G., Despalins, R., Kramarz, E., Wasserman, C., Sarchiapone, M. +3 more·2013·Psychopathology

Abstract

Background: Pathological Internet use (PIU) has been conceptualized as an impulse-control disorder that shares characteristics with behavioral addiction. Research has indicated a potential link between PIU and psychopathology; however, the significance of the correlation remains ambiguous. The primary objective of this systematic review was to identify and evaluate studies performed on the correlation between PIU and comorbid psychopathology; the secondary aims were to map the geographical distribution of studies, present a current synthesis of the evidence, and assess the quality of available research. Sampling and Methods: An electronic literature search was conducted using the following databases: MEDLINE, PsycARTICLES, PsychINFO, Global Health, and Web of Science. PIU and known synonyms were included in the search. Data were extracted based on PIU and psychopathology, including depression, anxiety, symptoms of attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), obsessive-compulsive symptoms, social phobia and hostility/aggression. Effect sizes for the correlations observed were identified from either the respective publication or calculated using Cohen’s d or R2. The potential effect of publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot model and evaluated by Egger’s test based on a linear regression. Results: The majority of research was conducted in Asia and comprised cross-sectional designs. Only one prospective study was identified. Twenty articles met the preset inclusion and exclusion criteria; 75% reported significant correlations of PIU with depression, 57% with anxiety, 100% with symptoms of ADHD, 60% with obsessive-compulsive symptoms, and 66% with hostility/aggression. No study reported associations between PIU and social phobia. The majority of studies reported a higher rate of PIU among males than females. The relative risks ranged from an OR of 1.02 to an OR of 11.66. The strongest correlations were observed between PIU and depression; the weakest was hostility/aggression. Conclusions: Depression and symptoms of ADHD appeared to have the most significant and consistent correlation with PIU. Associations were reported to be higher among males in all age groups. Limitations included heterogeneity in the definition and diagnosis of PIU. More studies with prospective designs in Western countries are critically needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000337971

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 91 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 6 Greenfield DN: Psychological characteris- tics of compulsive Internet use: a prelimi- nary analysis. Cyberpsychol Behav 1999; 2: 403-412.
  2. Wolfling K, Buhler M, Lemenager T, Morsen C, Mann K: Gambling and Internet addic- tion: review and research agenda (in Ger- man). Nervenarzt 2009; 80: 1030-1039.
  3. Fasolo CB: Internet addiction and porno- philia. Sex Disabil 2004; 22: 295.
  4. Ng BD, Wiemer-Hastings P, Hastings W: Ad- diction to massively multiplayer online role- playing games. Cyberpsychol Behav 2004; 7: 298-299.
  5. de Abreug CN, Karam RR, Goes DS, Spritzer DT: Internet and videogame addiction: a re- view (in Portuguese). Rev Bras Psiquiatr 2008; 30: 156-167.
  6. Wanajak K, Rudd C, Wilkinson A: Defini- tion and diagnostic criteria of Internet ad- diction. Int J Mental Health Nurs 2008; 17:A32-A33.
  7. Cao F, Su L: Internet addiction among Chi- nese adolescents: prevalence and psycholog- ical features. Child Care Health Dev 2007; 33: 275-281.
  8. Leung L: Net-generation attributes and se- ductive properties of the Internet as predic- tors of online activities and Internet addic- tion. Cyberpsychol Behav 2004; 7: 333-348.
  9. Wildt BTT, Putzig I, Zedler M, Ohlmeier MD: Internet dependency as a symptom of depressive mood disorders (in German). Psychiatr Prax 2007; 34:S318-S322.
  10. Chen SH, Yang JF: Internet addiction, social anxiety, and preference attribution of the virtual world. Int J Psychol 2004; 39: 512-512.
  11. CEBM: Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine -Levels of Evidence. Oxford, Uni- versity of Oxford, 2010.
  12. Lam LT, Peng ZW, Mai JC, Jing J: Factors as- sociated with Internet addiction among ado- lescents. Cyberpsychol Behav 2009; 12: 551- 555.
  13. Jang KS, Hwang SY, Choi JY: Internet addic- tion and psychiatric symptoms among Ko- rean adolescents. J Sch Health 2008; 78: 165- 171.
  14. Yoo HJ, Cho SC, Ha JY, Yune SK, Kim SJ, Hwang J, Chung A, Sung YH, Lyoo IK: At- tention deficit hyperactivity symptoms and Internet addiction. Psychiatry Clin Neuro- sci 2004; 58: 487-494.
  15. Eden GF, Vaidya CJ: ADHD and develop- mental dyslexia: two pathways leading to impaired learning. Ann NY Acad Sci 2008; 1145: 316-327.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carli, V., Durkee, T., Wasserman, D., Hadlaczky, G., Despalins, R., Kramarz, E., Wasserman, C., Sarchiapone, M., Hoven, C. W., Brunner, R., & Kaess, M.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • University of Molise (IT)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
Venue
Psychopathology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2012-07-31
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
1-13
ISSN
  • 0254-4962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-033X
OpenAlex
W2036230720
Cited by
639
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 96 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 14
FWCI
13.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi del Molise (submittedVersion)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • European Commission (223091)
  • Universität Heidelberg
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Universidad de Oviedo
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Keywords
internet addiction, comorbid psychopathology, depression, anxiety, ADHD symptoms, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, social anxiety disorder, behavioral addiction, impulse control disorders, sex differences
MeSH terms
Aggression, Anxiety Disorders, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Female, Hostility, Humans, Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders, Male, Comorbidity, Behavior, Addictive, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review