Cited by 54Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsComplex Network Analysis Techniques

Reduced efficiency of functional brain network underlying intellectual decline in patients with low-grade glioma

Xu, Huazhong, Ding, Shangwen, Hu, Xinhua, Yang, Kun, Xiao, Chaoyong, Zou, Yuanjie, Chen, Yijun, Tao, Ling +2 more·2013·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

Low-grade glioma (LGG) patients are typically accompanied by varying degrees of intellectual impairments. However, the neural mechanisms underlying intellectual decline have not yet been well understood. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between possibly altered functional brain network properties and intellectual decline in LGG patients. Chinese revised Wechsler adult intelligence scale (WAIS-RC) was used to assess the intelligence of 21 LGG patients and 20 healthy controls, matched in age, gender and education. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was performed for all the subjects to analyze functional network characteristics with graph theory. The LGG patients showed significantly poor performance on intelligence test than controls (P<0.05). Compared with controls, the patients displayed disturbed small-world manner (increased characteristic path length L and normalized characteristic path length λ) and decreased global efficiency Eglob. Specially, we found that Eglob was positively correlated with intelligence quotient (IQ) test scores in LGG group. Furthermore, network hubs, which could significantly affect the network efficiency, were in the right insula and right posterior cingulate cortex in controls, while in the right thalamus and right posterior cingulate cortex in the patients. From the perspective of brain network, our results provided evidence of reduced global efficiency for poorer intellectual performance in LGG patients, which contributed to understanding the basis of intellectual impairments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.02.062

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, H., Ding, S., Hu, X., Yang, K., Xiao, C., Zou, Y., Chen, Y., Tao, L., Liu, H., & Qian, Z.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing Brain Hospital (CN)
  • Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Liu, Hongyi
  • Qian, Zhiyu
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-05
Volume
543
Pages
27-31
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123155935
Cited by
54
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Clinical Science and Technology of Jiangsu Province (BL2012041)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
low-grade glioma, intellectual decline, global efficiency, small-world network properties, functional brain networks, network hubs, posterior cingulate cortex, thalamus, insula, intelligence quotient
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Brain Neoplasms, Female, Glioma, Humans, Intelligence Tests, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review