Plasma interleukin-6 and executive function in crack cocaine-dependent women.
Abstract
Aim The aim of this study was to investigate the association between plasma interleukin 6 (IL-6) levels and executive function (EF) in crack cocaine-dependent women. Methods 42 crack cocaine-dependent women (CRACK) and 52 healthy women (CONTROL) were evaluated with respect to EF using the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). Plasma IL-6 levels were quantitatively determined using the multiplexed cytometric bead assay. Results The CRACK group had poor performance on WSCT scores (Non-perseverative Errors and Percent Conceptual Level Responses) and higher plasma IL-6 levels when compared with the CONTROL group. Furthermore, IL-6 was correlated with worsening of several WCST sub-scores and a linear regression model showed that IL-6 levels predicted worse cognitive flexibility within the CRACK group independently of intelligence quotient and education. Conclusions The results of this study indicated that low performances in EF task are associated with higher IL-6 levels in crack cocaine-dependent women. These data bolster previous works that link the cognitive decline observed in drug addicts with mechanisms of inflammation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cocaine is associated with increased immune reactivity and inflammation in humans and neuroinflammation in animal models.
“Cocaine is a highly potent and addictive brain stimulant that is associated with increased immune reactivity and inflammation in humans (Fox et al., 2012; Ersche et al., 2014; Levandowski et al., 2016; Moreira et al., 2016; Pianca et al., 2017) and neuroinflammation in animal models (Guo et al., 2015; Periyasamy et al., 2017).”
From Engineered Extracellular Vesicles Loaded With miR-124 Attenuate Cocaine-Mediated Activation of Microglia (2020) · cites this paper as Levandowski et al., 2016
Cites
From inflammation to sickness and depression: when the immune system subjugates the brain
Dantzer, R., O'Connor, J. C., Freund, G. G., Johnson, R. W., & Kelley, K. W. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2297 · Cited by 7,395 · see citing works
Cytokine-Associated Emotional and Cognitive Disturbances in Humans
Reichenberg, A., Yirmiya, R., Schuld, A., Kraus, T., Haack, M., Morag, A., & Pollmächer, T. (2001) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.58.5.445 · Cited by 1,365 · see citing works
Monchi, O., Petrides, M., Petre, V., Worsley, K., & Dagher, A. (2001) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.21-19-07733.2001 · Cited by 961 · see citing works
Cytokines and the Brain: Implications for Clinical Psychiatry
Kronfol, Z., & Remick, D. G. (2000) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.157.5.683 · Cited by 784 · see citing works
Systemic markers of inflammation and cognitive decline in old age
Schram, M. T., Euser, S. M., De Craen, A. J. M., Witteman, J. C., Frölich, M., Hofman, A., Jolles, J., Breteler, M. M. B., & Westendorp, R. G. J. (2007) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01159.x · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Characterizing the cognitive effects of cocaine: a comprehensive review.
Spronk, D. B., van Wel, J. H. P., Ramaekers, J. G., & Verkes, R. J. (2013) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.07.003 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chivero, E. T., Liao, K., Niu, F., Tripathi, A., Tian, C., Buch, S., & Hu, G. (2020) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2020.00573 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
- Authors
- Levandowski, M. L., Hess, A. R. B., Grassi-Oliveira, R., & de Almeida, R. M. M.
- Venue
- Neuroscience Letters
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 628
- Pages
- 85-90
- ISSN
- 0304-3940
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 6
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review