Cited by 45Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

Focused transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex modulates specific domains of self-regulation

Pripfl, Jürgen, Lamm, Claus·2015·Neuroscience Research

Abstract

Recent neuroscience theories suggest that different kinds of self-regulation may share a common psychobiological mechanism. However, empirical evidence for a domain general self-regulation mechanism is scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate whether focused anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), facilitating the activity of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), acts on a domain general self-regulation mechanism and thus modulates both affective and appetitive self-regulation. Twenty smokers participated in this within-subject sham controlled study. Effects of anodal left, anodal right and sham tDCS over the dlPFC on affective picture appraisal and nicotine craving-cue appraisal were assessed. Anodal right tDCS over the dlPFC reduced negative affect in emotion appraisal, but neither modulated regulation of positive emotion appraisal nor of craving appraisal. Anodal left stimulation did not induce any significant effects. The results of our study show that domain specific self-regulation networks are at work in the prefrontal cortex. Focused tDCS modulation of this specific self-regulation network could probably be used during the first phase of nicotine abstinence, during which negative affect might easily result in relapse. These findings have implications for neuroscience models of self-regulation and are of relevance for the development of brain stimulation based treatment methods for neuropsychiatric disorders associated with self-regulation…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neures.2014.09.007

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pripfl, J., & Lamm, C.
Affiliations
University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Pripfl, Jürgen
Venue
Neuroscience Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
91
Pages
41-47
ISSN
0168-0102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010425691
Cited by
45
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • MMI-CNS research cluster
  • Oesterreichische Nationalbank
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
transcranial direct current stimulation, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, self-regulation, affective self-regulation, nicotine craving, negative affect, emotion appraisal, smoking, nicotine abstinence, domain specificity, neuromodulation
MeSH terms
Self-Control, Adult, Cues, Emotions, Humans, Photic Stimulation, Smoking, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Craving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review