Cited by 144Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

A randomized placebo-controlled trial of targeted prefrontal cortex modulation with bilateral tDCS in patients with crack-cocaine dependence

Open access
Batista, Edson Kruger, Klauss, Jaisa, Fregni, Felipe, Nitsche, Michael A., Nakamura-Palacios, Ester Miyuki·2015·International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex has been shown to be clinically useful in the treatment of drug addiction. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind randomized clinical trial aiming to assess the effects of bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation (left cathodal/right anodal) on crack-cocaine addiction. We defined craving as the primary outcome, and other clinical measurements, including depressive and anxiety symptoms, and quality of life, as secondary outcomes. Seventeen male crack-cocaine users (mean age 30.4 ± 9.8 SD) were randomized to receive 5 sessions of active transcranial direct current stimulation (2 mA, 35 cm(2), for 20 minutes), every other day, and 19 males (mean age 30.3 ± 8.4 SD) to receive sham-transcranial direct current stimulation (placebo) as control group. RESULTS: Craving scores were significantly reduced in the transcranial direct current stimulation group after treatment when compared with sham-transcranial direct current stimulation (P = .028) and baseline values (P = .003), and decreased linearly over 4 weeks (before, during, and after treatment) in the transcranial direct current stimulation group only (P = .047). Changes of anxiety scores towards increase in the sham-transcranial direct current stimulation and decrease in the transcranial direct current stimulation group (P = .03), and of the overall perception of quality of life (P = .031) and of health (P = .048) towards decrease in the sham-transcranial direct current stimulation group and increase in the transcranial direct current stimulation group differed significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Repetitive bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex reduced craving for crack-cocaine use, decreased anxiety, and improved quality of life. We hypothesize that transcranial direct current stimulation effects may be associated with increased prefrontal processing and regulation of craving behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ijnp/pyv066

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Vorspan F Bellais L Romo L Bloch V Neira R Lepine JP (2012) The Obsessive-Compulsive Cocaine Scale (OCCS): a pilot study of a new questionnaire for assessing cocaine craving. Am J Addict 21: 313– 319. 22691009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Batista, E. K., Klauss, J., Fregni, F., Nitsche, M. A., & Nakamura-Palacios, E. M.
Affiliations
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Nakamura-Palacios, Ester Miyuki
Venue
International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2015-06-10
Volume
18
Issue
12
Pages
pyv066
ISSN
  • 1461-1457 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5111
OpenAlex
W2260524443
Cited by
144
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 1
FWCI
8.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • GRO (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
transcranial direct current stimulation, crack cocaine dependence, drug craving, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, non-invasive brain stimulation, anxiety, quality of life, addiction treatment
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Depression, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Severity of Illness Index, Crack Cocaine, Treatment Outcome, Prefrontal Cortex, Cocaine-Related Disorders, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Craving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review