The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Developmental neurotoxicity testing in vitro: Models for assessing chemical effects on neurite outgrowth
Abstract
In vitro models may be useful for the rapid toxicological screening of large numbers of chemicals for their potential to produce toxicity. Such screening could facilitate prioritization of resources needed for in vivo toxicity testing towards those chemicals most likely to result in adverse health effects. Cell cultures derived from nervous system tissue have proven to be powerful tools for elucidating cellular and molecular mechanisms of nervous system development and function, and have been used to understand the mechanism of action of neurotoxic chemicals. Recently, it has been suggested that in vitro models could be used to screen for chemical effects on critical cellular events of neurodevelopment, including differentiation and neurite growth. This review examines the use of neuronal cell cultures as an in vitro model of neurite outgrowth. Examples of the cell culture systems that are commonly used to examine the effects of chemicals on neurite outgrowth are provided, along with a description of the methods used to quantify this neurodevelopmental process in vitro. Issues relating to the relevance of the methods and models currently used to assess neurite outgrowth are discussed in the context of hazard identification and chemical screening. To demonstrate the utility of in vitro models of neurite outgrowth for the evaluation of large numbers of chemicals, efforts should be made to: (1) develop a set of reference chemicals that can be used as positive and negative controls for comparing neurite outgrowth between model systems, (2) focus on cell cultures of human origin, with emphasis on the emerging area of neural progenitor cells, and (3) use high-throughput methods to quantify endpoints of neurite outgrowth.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rice, D., & Barone, S. (2000) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.00108s3511 · Cited by 2,944
The establishment of polarity by hippocampal neurons in culture.
Dotti, C., Sullivan, C., & Banker, G. (1988) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.08-04-01454.1988 · Cited by 1,862
Rat hippocampal neurons in dispersed cell culture.
Banker, G. A., & Cowan, W. M. (1977) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(77)90594-7 · Cited by 1,110
Axelrad, J. C., Howard, C. V., & McLean, W. G. (2002) · Toxicology · doi:10.1016/s0300-483x(02)00036-7 · Cited by 75
Cited by
Microelectrode arrays: A physiologically based neurotoxicity testing platform for the 21st century
Johnstone, A. F. M., Gross, G. W., Weiss, D. G., Schroeder, O. H.-U., Gramowski, A., & Shafer, T. J. (2010) · NeuroToxicology · doi:10.1016/j.neuro.2010.04.001 · Cited by 375
Harrill, J. A., Freudenrich, T., Wallace, K., Ball, K., Shafer, T. J., & Mundy, W. R. (2018) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.taap.2018.04.001 · Cited by 86
Self-citationHarrill, J. A., Freudenrich, T. M., Robinette, B. L., & Mundy, W. R. (2011) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.taap.2011.02.013 · Cited by 85
Self-citationDrug-mediated toxicity: illuminating the ‘bad’ in the test tube by means of cellular assays?
Tralau, T., & Luch, A. (2012) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2012.03.015 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Radio, N. M., & Mundy, W. R.
- Venue
- NeuroToxicology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 361-376
- ISSN
- 0161-813X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067924915
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 23.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Developmental neurotoxicity testing in vitro: Models for assessing chemical effects on neurite outgrowth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neuro.2008.02.011
- The paper
- Radio, N. M., & Mundy, W. R. (2008). Developmental neurotoxicity testing in vitro: Models for assessing chemical effects on neurite outgrowth. NeuroToxicology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2008.02.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.