Cited by 68Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Neocortical synaptic bouton number is maintained despite robust amyloid deposition in APP23 transgenic mice

Boncristiano, Sonia, Calhoun, Michael E., Howard, Victor, Bondolfi, Luca, Kaeser, Stephan A., Wiederhold, Karl-Heinz, Staufenbiel, Matthias, Jucker, Mathias·2005·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

Major pathological findings in Alzheimer's disease (AD) brain include the deposition of amyloid-beta and synapse loss. Synaptic loss has been shown to correlate with the cognitive decline in AD patients, but the relationship between cerebral amyloidosis and synapse loss is complicated by the presence of neurofibrillary tangles and other lesions in AD brain. With the use of the APP23 transgenic mouse model that overexpresses human amyloid precursor protein (APP) with the Swedish double mutation, we investigated whether the development of cortical amyloid deposition was accompanied by synaptic bouton loss. With stereological methods, we show that despite robust age-related cortical amyloid deposition with associated synaptic degeneration, the total number of cortical synaptophysin-positive presynaptic terminals is not changed in 24-month-old animals compared with 3-, 8-, and 15-month-old APP23 mice. Wild-type mice also do not show an age-related loss of presynaptic boutons in the neocortex and are not significantly different from APP23 mice. Synaptophysin Western blotting revealed no significant difference between APP23 mice and wild-type controls at 3 and 25 months of age. Our results suggest that cerebral amyloidosis is not sufficient to account for the global synapse loss in AD. Alternatively, a putative trophic effect of APP may prevent, compensate, or delay a loss of synapses in this mouse model.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.06.010

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boncristiano, S., Calhoun, M. E., Howard, V., Bondolfi, L., Kaeser, S. A., Wiederhold, K.-H., Staufenbiel, M., & Jucker, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
Corresponding author
Jucker, Mathias
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-05
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
607-613
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058813140
Cited by
68
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health
  • Universität Basel
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-beta deposition, cerebral amyloidosis, synaptic loss, synaptophysin, presynaptic terminals, synaptic boutons, APP23 transgenic mice, amyloid precursor protein, neocortex, synapse maintenance
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Alzheimer Disease, Amyloid, Amyloidosis, Animals, Cell Count, Disease Models, Animal, Immunohistochemistry, Mice, Transgenic, Synapses, Blotting, Western, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Synaptophysin, Presynaptic Terminals, Neocortex, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review