Cited by 59Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research

An evaluation of the use of passive shimming to improve frontal sensitivity in fMRI

Cusack, Rhodri, Russell, Benedict, Cox, Sylvia M.L., De Panfilis, Claudia, Schwarzbauer, Christian, Ansorge, Richard·2005·NeuroImage

Abstract

The presence of the head in an MRI scanner leads to inhomogeneities in the magnetic field. These cause the 'susceptibility artifacts' of image distortion and signal dropout. In this paper, we evaluate a technique called passive shimming, which has the potential to reduce field inhomogeneities and the resultant artifacts. A piece of a magnetically active material (pyrolytic graphite) is held on the roof of the participant's mouth by a plastic mouth mould. We evaluate the effects in several different ways. We show that the presence of a shim reduces field inhomogeneity across much of the brain. From field maps, we generate simulations of EPI image intensity and BOLD sensitivity. Both of these are mainly improved by the presence of shim, although there were small reductions in some regions. Measured EPI image intensity also mostly increased. Finally, we ran a reward-punishment task in our subjects, and found that the presence of a shim increased functional sensitivity in the orbitofrontal cortex. Using the BOLD sensitivity measure, we provide estimates of the improvement to be expected in functional studies for a range of neural structures. Passive shims are quick to make and reasonably comfortable to wear, and have substantial potential for researchers investigating inferior frontal brain regions using MRI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.08.029

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The medial orbital prefrontal cortex/gyrus rectus is badly affected by magnetic susceptibility artifact in fMRI studies, and to a lesser extent in DTI studies, due to the sensitivity of the echo planar imaging sequence to magnetic field gradients that occur adjacent to the paranasal sinuses.

    “Importantly, the medial orbital prefrontal cortex/gyrus rectus is badly affected by magnetic susceptibility artifact in fMRI studies, and to a lesser extent in DTI studies, due to the sensitivity of the echo planar imaging sequence to magnetic field gradients that occur adjacent to the paranasal sinuses.”

    From Widespread reductions in gray matter volume in depression (2013) · cites this paper as Cusack et al., 2005

  • These gradients reduce the contrast-to-noise of the Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent response and also cause geometric distortion.

    “These gradients reduce the contrast-to-noise of the Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent response and also cause geometric distortion (Cusack et al., 2005; Grieve, 2000).”

    From Widespread reductions in gray matter volume in depression (2013) · cites this paper as Cusack et al., 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cusack, R., Russell, B., Cox, S. M. L., De Panfilis, C., Schwarzbauer, C., & Ansorge, R.
Affiliations
  • MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Cusack, Rhodri
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-01
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
82-91
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078240820
Cited by
59
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Keywords
passive shimming, magnetic field inhomogeneity, susceptibility artifacts, pyrolytic graphite, BOLD sensitivity, orbitofrontal cortex, inferior frontal cortex, functional MRI, field maps
MeSH terms
Carbon, Frontal Lobe, Graphite, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Mouth Protectors, Oxygen, Palate, Paranasal Sinuses, Sensitivity and Specificity, Artifacts, Echo-Planar Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review