Cited by 52EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesNumerical methods in inverse problemsDirection-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques

Multivariate source prelocalization (MSP): Use of functionally informed basis functions for better conditioning the MEG inverse problem

MATTOUT, J, PELEGRINIISSAC, M, GARNERO, L, BENALI, H·2005·NeuroImage

Abstract

Spatially characterizing and quantifying the brain electromagnetic response using MEG/EEG data still remains a critical issue since it requires solving an ill-posed inverse problem that does not admit a unique solution. To overcome this lack of uniqueness, inverse methods have to introduce prior information about the solution. Most existing approaches are directly based upon extrinsic anatomical and functional priors and usually attempt at simultaneously localizing and quantifying brain activity. By contrast, this paper deals with a preprocessing tool which aims at better conditioning the source reconstruction process, by relying only upon intrinsic knowledge (a forward model and the MEG/EEG data itself) and focusing on the key issue of localization. Based on a discrete and realistic anatomical description of the cortex, we first define functionally Informed Basis Functions (fIBF) that are subject specific. We then propose a multivariate method which exploits these fIBF to calculate a probability-like coefficient of activation associated with each dipolar source of the model. This estimated distribution of activation coefficients may then be used as an intrinsic functional prior, either by taking these quantities into account in a subsequent inverse method, or by thresholding the set of probabilities in order to reduce the dimension of the solution space. These two ways of constraining the source reconstruction process may naturally be coupled. We successively describe the proposed Multivariate Source Prelocalization (MSP) approach and illustrate its performance on both simulated and real MEG data. Finally, the better conditioning induced by the MSP process in a classical regularization scheme is extensively and quantitatively evaluated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.026

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Parcellation improves the condition of the EEG inverse problem and reduces computation time, making it attractive for real-time applications.

    “Parcellation is particularly attractive for real-time applications as it improves the condition of the EEG inverse problem and reduces computation time (48).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MATTOUT, J., PELEGRINIISSAC, M., GARNERO, L., & BENALI, H.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
MATTOUT, J
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-06
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
356-373
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062962405
Cited by
52
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Numerical methods in inverse problems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Direction-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
Keywords
MEG inverse problem, ill-posed inverse problems, source localization, regularization, dimensionality reduction
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Computer Simulation, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory, Humans, Functional Laterality, Models, Neurological, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Magnetoencephalography, Models, Statistical, Multivariate Analysis, Pyramidal Cells, Principal Component Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review