Cited by 88Neural dynamics and brain functionFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Dynamic causal models and physiological inference: a validation study using isoflurane anaesthesia in rodents

Open access
Moran, Rosalyn J., Jung, Fabienne, Kumagai, Tetsuya, Endepols, Heike, Graf, Rudolf, Dolan, Raymond J., Friston, Karl J., Stephan, Klaas E. +1 more·2011·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Generative models of neuroimaging and electrophysiological data present new opportunities for accessing hidden or latent brain states. Dynamic causal modeling (DCM) uses Bayesian model inversion and selection to infer the synaptic mechanisms underlying empirically observed brain responses. DCM for electrophysiological data, in particular, aims to estimate the relative strength of synaptic transmission at different cell types and via specific neurotransmitters. Here, we report a DCM validation study concerning inference on excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission, using different doses of a volatile anaesthetic agent (isoflurane) to parametrically modify excitatory and inhibitory synaptic processing while recording local field potentials (LFPs) from primary auditory cortex (A1) and the posterior auditory field (PAF) in the auditory belt region in rodents. We test whether DCM can infer, from the LFP measurements, the expected drug-induced changes in synaptic transmission mediated via fast ionotropic receptors; i.e., excitatory (glutamatergic) AMPA and inhibitory GABA(A) receptors. Cross- and auto-spectra from the two regions were used to optimise three DCMs based on biologically plausible neural mass models and specific network architectures. Consistent with known extrinsic connectivity patterns in sensory hierarchies, we found that a model comprising forward connections from A1 to PAF and backward connections from PAF to A1 outperformed a model with forward connections from PAF to A1 and backward connections from A1 to PAF and a model with reciprocal lateral connections. The parameter estimates from the most plausible model indicated that the amplitude of fast glutamatergic excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) and inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) behaved as predicted by previous neurophysiological studies. Specifically, with increasing levels of anaesthesia, glutamatergic EPSPs decreased linearly, whereas fast GABAergic IPSPs displayed a nonlinear (saturating) increase. The consistency of our model-based in vivo results with experimental in vitro results lends further validity to the capacity of DCM to infer on synaptic processes using macroscopic neurophysiological data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0022790

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Validation studies in humans and animals show that DCM for EEG can capture short-term changes in synaptic efficacy, such as neuromodulation of glutamatergic receptor conductances, and distinguish different types of synaptic plasticity in cortical microcircuits.

    “Validation studies in humans and animals have shown that DCM for EEG is capable of capturing short-term changes in synaptic efficacy, such as neuromodulation of glutamatergic receptor conductances, and distinguish different types of synaptic plasticity in cortical microcircuits (66, 132, 138–140)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14]Jansen B Rit V 1995 Electroencephalogram and visual evoked potential generation in a mathematical model of coupled cortical columns. Biological Cybernetics 73 357 366 7578475

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moran, R. J., Jung, F., Kumagai, T., Endepols, H., Graf, R., Dolan, R. J., Friston, K. J., Stephan, K. E., & Tittgemeyer, M.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
  • Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Moran, Rosalyn J.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2011-08-02
Volume
6
Issue
8
Pages
e22790
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105927641
Cited by
88
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
  • VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (088130)
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  • SystemsX.ch
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
dynamic causal modeling, isoflurane anesthesia, synaptic transmission, excitatory postsynaptic potentials, inhibitory postsynaptic potentials, AMPA receptors, GABAA receptor, local field potentials, primary auditory cortex, neural mass model, reciprocal connections, model validation
MeSH terms
Animals, Bayes Theorem, Isoflurane, Models, Theoretical, Synaptic Transmission, Anesthetics, Inhalation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review