Cited by 316Hemispheric Asymmetry in NeuroscienceAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Fiber density asymmetry of the arcuate fasciculus in relation to functional hemispheric language lateralization in both right- and left-handed healthy subjects: a combined fMRI and DTI study

Vernooij, M.W., Smits, M., Wielopolski, P.A., Houston, G.C., Krestin, G.P., van der Lugt, A.·2007·NeuroImage

Abstract

Previously reported leftward asymmetry in language-related gray and white matter areas of the brain has been proposed as a structural correlate of left-sided functional hemispheric language lateralization. However, structural asymmetry in non-left-sided functional language lateralization has as yet not been studied. Furthermore, the neuroanatomical basis of the reported volumetric white matter asymmetry is not fully understood. In 20 healthy volunteers, including 13 left-handers, we performed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). We studied the relative fiber density (RFD) of the arcuate fasciculus (AF), using DT-tractography, in relation to functional hemispheric language lateralization. Hemispheric language lateralization was right-sided in five left-handed individuals. We demonstrated an overall significant leftward asymmetry in RFD of the AF, irrespective of handedness or functional language lateralization. Furthermore, in right-handers, the degree of structural asymmetry was found to be correlated with the degree of functional lateralization. We conclude that structural asymmetry in the AF does not seem to reflect functional hemispheric language lateralization, as has been proposed previously. Our findings suggest that the previously reported white matter asymmetry may be explained by a structural asymmetry in the arcuate fasciculus. These findings have important implications for the understanding of the functional and structura…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.12.041

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vernooij, M. W., Smits, M., Wielopolski, P. A., Houston, G. C., Krestin, G. P., & van der Lugt, A.
Affiliations
Erasmus MC (NL)
Corresponding author
Vernooij, M.W.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-04
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
1064-1076
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149479555
Cited by
316
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 12
FWCI
8.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
arcuate fasciculus, handedness, tractography, right-handedness, left-handedness, language functions
MeSH terms
Adult, Arcuate Nucleus of Hypothalamus, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Language, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Fibers, Myelinated, Neural Pathways, Speech

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review