Cited by 75Reading and Literacy DevelopmentNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismHearing Impairment and Communication

Phonological processing in relation to reading: an fMRI study in deaf readers

Aparicio, Mario, Gounot, Daniel, Demont, Elisabeth, Metz-Lutz, Marie-Noëlle·2007·NeuroImage

Abstract

Without special education, early deprivation of auditory speech input, hinders the development of phonological representations and may alter the neural mechanisms of reading. By using fMRI during lexical and rhyming decision tasks, we compared in hearing and pre-lingually deaf subjects the neural activity in functional regions of interest (ROIs) engaged in reading. The results show in deaf readers significantly higher activation in the ROIs relevant to the grapho-phonological route, but also in the posterior medial frontal cortex (pMFC) and the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). These adjustments may be interpreted within the dual route model of reading as an alternative strategy, which gives priority to rule-based letter-to-sound conversion. Activation in the right IFG would account for compensation mechanisms based on phonological recoding and inner speech while activation in the posterior medial frontal cortex (pMFC) may relate to the cognitive effort called for by the alternative strategy. Our data suggest that the neural mechanisms of reading are shaped by the auditory experience of speech.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.12.046

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aparicio, M., Gounot, D., Demont, E., & Metz-Lutz, M.-N.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-04
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
1303-1316
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066228684
Cited by
75
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Conseil Régional d'Alsace
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
Keywords
phonological processing, reading, deaf readers, prelingual deafness, posterior medial frontal cortex, right inferior frontal gyrus, phonological recoding, inner speech, auditory deprivation, lexical decision, rhyme, compensatory neural mechanisms
MeSH terms
Adult, Articulation Disorders, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Deafness, Discrimination, Psychological, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Phonetics, Reading, Speech

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review