Cited by 170Reading and Literacy DevelopmentNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Word and non-word reading: What role for the Visual Word Form Area?

Vigneau, M., Jobard, G., Mazoyer, B., Tzourio-Mazoyer, N.·2005·NeuroImage

Abstract

The putative role of the so-called Visual Word Form Area (VWFA) during reading remains under debate. For some authors, this region is specifically involved in a pre-lexical processing of words and pseudowords, whereas such specificity is challenged by others given the VWFA involvement during both non-word reading and word listening. Here, we further investigated this issue, measuring BOLD variations and their lateralization with fMRI during word and non-word reading, in order to evaluate the lexicality effect, and during reading and listening of words, in order to evaluate the impact of stimulus delivery modality on word processing networks. Region of interest (ROI) analysis was first performed in three target areas: 1-VWFA as defined by a meta-analysis of the word reading literature, 2-a middle temporal area (T2) found co-activated by both word reading and listening, 3-an inferior occipital area (OI) belonging to the unimodal visual cortex of the inferior occipital gyrus. VWFA activity was found not different between word and non-word reading but was more leftward lateralized during word reading due to a reduction of activity in the VWFA right counterpart. A similar larger leftward lateralization during word reading was also uncovered in the T2 ROI but was related to a larger left side activity. Such a lexicality effect was not observed in the OI ROI. By contrast, BOLD increases during listening were restricted to the left VWFA and T2 ROIs. Voxel-based analysis (SPM99) showed that semantic areas were more active during word than non-word reading and co-activated by both reading and listening, exhibiting a left lateralized activity in all tasks. These results indicate that the left VWFA would be the place where visual and verbal representations bind under the control of left semantic areas.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.038

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vigneau, M., Jobard, G., Mazoyer, B., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-09
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
694-705
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009895480
Cited by
169
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 19
FWCI
14.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Région Normandie
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
visual word form area, nonword reading, pseudowords, lexicality effect, reading versus listening, hemispheric lateralization, middle temporal area, inferior occipital gyrus, semantic processing
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Auditory Perception, Brain Mapping, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Oxygen, Reading, Speech, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review